Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hi. Thanks! To temporarily do this, we can use a way like this:
The results show that most of OTUs (from 13628 to 10 remained) have a low abundance (< 0.0001) in at least one sample. Chi |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello,
I have a question about the
filter_taxa
function. The idea is to remove low-frequency ASVs to mitigate the effect of index jumping in Illumina metabarcoding dfata. For example,microeco_object$filter_taxa(rel_abund = 0.0001)
would filter out ASVs that are <0.01% in the entire dataset. But wouldn’t it be more accurate to remove those that are <0.01% in each sample? If so, is this possible with microeco? I ask because, in large datasets with different sample types, filtering across all samples could eliminate ASVs that represent real and important diversity in certain samples.Does this make sense to you? thanks! Not really sure about the best approach, I have seen both in articles
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions