You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you very much, it has solved the problem. Can you explain shortly what this function does. I have seen that it doesnt remove rows from the tax_table. From what I have read it replaces NA with " ", is that correct? And I guess it does that at any taxonomic level?
Should I run this always at the begining when I do the data filtering?
Yes. This function can replace all the so-called useless thing (NA, unknown, unclassified, ......) with "" and add the prefix (e.g. p__) for each taxonomic level. The reason we create this function is the taxonomic table we often got is chotic. I have seen many wired things in that. So unifying the table generally is necessary. So add it into your pipeline (before creating microtable), just once. It is enough.
Hello,
when I do a graph on the relative abundance for the genus of my data, NA appears on the x axis.
Is there a function to eliminate the NA from the graph? Or do I have to filter my data differently?
Thank you in advance :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: