-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bibtex citation not working for some IOP DOIs #89
Comments
Stack trace:
|
This might need its own issue, but somewhat related example. In the IOP examples, with multiple forward slashes, if I use Actions > Cite on CRMDS, all citation formats are blank. In this case, for 10.1002/cphy.c150015 only BibTex is blank. The rest of the citation formats work correctly. The user gave an example of their query and its results.
|
IOP curious if we have a timetable or a workaround for this issue? I am not aware of either @ppolischuk or @gbilder. I have communicated our decision to keep the freeze in place to IOP. When we have a timetable or a workaround, we'll provide updates here and within Zendesk (ticket 131006 for reference). |
Afraid this is something we just have to say "we don't have time for it now, and we don't take that lightly". Could be weeks at least. |
Looks like we have another example of this problem from this DOI - https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01137. Zendesk ticket 134241 for internal reference. |
IOP is having some more concerns about DOIs related to that hugely hyped black hole picture that was all over the place recently. The BibTeX citation formatting isn’t working for them.
10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7
10.3847/2041-8213/ab0c96
10.3847/2041-8213/ab0c57
10.3847/2041-8213/ab0e85
10.3847/2041-8213/ab0f43
10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141
I can also confirm this by using search.crossref.org and trying Actions>Cite for the above DOIs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: