You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Does anyone has opinions (and arguments) for or against using as native unit
radians
strain
micro-strain
nano-strain
...
As geophysicist I prefer physical units. Using radians also requires the introduction of another header value for the scaling.
units other than strain [m/m] may allow going for lower-precission formats of the data matrix
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
One bit of info that might be necessary is the original unit for data collection. Some instruments output phase and others provide phase rate. We've been exploring how phase v phase rate impacts channel fading. So, it seems like important info to include in metadata.
Thanks gloverha
The latest iteration of the format actually incorporates that idea. a new required header field describes the unit of the data on disk.
An additional scale factor is also provided, with a new unit-string after conversion
Does anyone has opinions (and arguments) for or against using as native unit
As geophysicist I prefer physical units. Using radians also requires the introduction of another header value for the scaling.
units other than strain [m/m] may allow going for lower-precission formats of the data matrix
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: