You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At the moment, there is dsm.var.prop and dsm.var.gam to estimate variance of abundance estimates. This is confusing, it would be better to include uncertainty from the detection function by default when possible and inform the user which is happening. (There's also a lot of code duplication.)
Also need to implement parametric bootstrap method as suggested in Wood (2006).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Probably best to do this as a UI change to wrap the two existing functions, that will break minimal stuff.
Eventually one could merge them completely, as there is a lot of overlapping code.
For posterior sampling, I'd think a function like dsm_posterior_samples(varprop_result, n_samples=1000, newdata=predgrid) would give you what you want? (It's just a wrapper around rmvn and then some matrix multiplication/application of the inverse link function.)
At the moment, there is
dsm.var.prop
anddsm.var.gam
to estimate variance of abundance estimates. This is confusing, it would be better to include uncertainty from the detection function by default when possible and inform the user which is happening. (There's also a lot of code duplication.)Also need to implement parametric bootstrap method as suggested in Wood (2006).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: