You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
GitHub issues are specifically for issues with the GTDB-Tk, please join us on the GTDB forum:
GTDB forum: https://forum.gtdb.ecogenomic.org/
How to understand the results in the classification column of bin.bac120.summary.tsv, where some phylum names like bacillota have suffixes such as A, B, C, D? Can I group them as one category, bacillota? I would like to know why suffixes like ABCD are given at the phylum level. What is the difference between bacillota_A and bacillota?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
"Taxon names above the rank of genus appended with an alphabetic suffix indicate groups that are under the following category: i) groups that are not monophyletic in the GTDB reference tree, but for which there exists alternative evidence that they are monophyletic groups; ii) groups whose placement is unstable between releases.
A best effort is made to retain the same alphabetical suffix for a taxon between GTDB releases, but this is not guaranteed."
GitHub issues are specifically for issues with the GTDB-Tk, please join us on the GTDB forum:
GTDB forum:
https://forum.gtdb.ecogenomic.org/
How to understand the results in the classification column of bin.bac120.summary.tsv, where some phylum names like bacillota have suffixes such as A, B, C, D? Can I group them as one category, bacillota? I would like to know why suffixes like ABCD are given at the phylum level. What is the difference between bacillota_A and bacillota?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: