Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Cannot Verify SDK #67

Closed
mclark-tascet opened this issue Apr 3, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Cannot Verify SDK #67

mclark-tascet opened this issue Apr 3, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
@mclark-tascet
Labels
invalid This doesn't seem right

Comments

@mclark-tascet
Copy link

I cannot add a new SDK (in this case SBCL). I receive an error during verification, and cannot proceed.

  • Windows 10
  • PyCharm 2023.1 (professional edition)
  • Using v 0.5.0 of the plugin.
PS C:\Users\macke> sbcl --version
SBCL 2.3.2

Installed with Chocolatey. Downloaded quicklisp file from the website. .

image
@Enerccio
Copy link
Owner

Enerccio commented Apr 3, 2023

I'll check it out.

@Enerccio Enerccio added the bug Something isn't working label Apr 3, 2023
@Enerccio Enerccio self-assigned this Apr 3, 2023
@Enerccio
Copy link
Owner

Enerccio commented Apr 3, 2023

Wait, I think I know what the issue can be. Quicklisp, if you are installing it manually, needs to be installed. You do not just download and use the file. Check https://github.com/Enerccio/SLT/wiki/User-Guide#manual-installation

@Enerccio Enerccio added the invalid This doesn't seem right label Apr 3, 2023
@Enerccio Enerccio assigned mclark-tascet and unassigned Enerccio Apr 3, 2023
@Enerccio Enerccio removed the bug Something isn't working label Apr 3, 2023
@mclark-tascet
Copy link
Author

Thanks! I installed quicklisp following the instructions and it works.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mclark-tascet mclark-tascet

Labels
invalid This doesn't seem right
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Enerccio @mclark-tascet