Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestions for landing page for OpenACR section of Section508.gov #336

Open
mgifford opened this issue Feb 22, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Suggestions for landing page for OpenACR section of Section508.gov #336

mgifford opened this issue Feb 22, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@mgifford
Copy link
Collaborator

mgifford commented Feb 22, 2022

Coming from #271 (comment)

OpenACR will need to be managed from within Section508.gov. There needs to be a landing page to explain this ACR, link to the editor and help provide folks manage the transition.

@dmundra dmundra added this to the Option 2 - Sprint 3 milestone Feb 22, 2022
@danid123
Copy link

From a design and usability perspective I think these are some important points for the landing page:

  • Many of the interior pages of Section508.gov don't have photos, but I think it's important to show the impact that OpenACR can have on federal employees with disabilities being able to conduct their job duties with minimal friction.
  • Use of icons with text labels to add visual emphasis and interest and reduce cognitive load
  • A glossary to explain unfamiliar terms and to demystify acronyms
  • Role-based content so that vendors, procurement, and accessibility SMEs and advocates can understand how the new format will affect them

@melindaburgess
Copy link

We developed content for the OpenACR site which was designed to help folks understand why it is important, regardless of their level of knowledge about accessibility and procurement.

Perhaps some of this content can be adopted into the new OpenACR landing page, or linked to from the landing page:

@mgifford
Copy link
Collaborator Author

See changes in GSA/Section508.gov#229

Formatting did not align with that when it was a subsite.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants