You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I find a "*1000" in the last formula of paprika tutorial 1.
Could you please explain the "*1000" here? Because I find in the original paper, it is said that concentration is already adjusted to 1 M so that we can compare simulation values to experimental ones. What is the unit of "280" here? Should it be M^-1 or anything else? If so, why should we "*1000"?
Thanks in advance for your clarification!
Best regards,
Bowen
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @bowensha-tudelft, I believe the experimental value is reported in micro Molar (uM), so it becomes 280 x 10^-3 M. But this is the Ka (association), and the Gibbs free energy equation is dG = -RT ln (Kd) = -RT ln (1/Ka). Then Kd = 1/(280 x 10^-3 M) = 280 x 10^3 M.
The reference to 1 M in the paper includes this in the APR calculation when we estimate the work of releasing the restraints in bulk water. Check out Equation (9) in the 2015 paper. The 1 M is the C^0 symbol, which is ~1661 in units of Angstrom^3.
Hi, I find a "*1000" in the last formula of paprika tutorial 1.
Could you please explain the "*1000" here? Because I find in the original paper, it is said that concentration is already adjusted to 1 M so that we can compare simulation values to experimental ones. What is the unit of "280" here? Should it be M^-1 or anything else? If so, why should we "*1000"?
Thanks in advance for your clarification!
Best regards,
Bowen
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: