Mortgages, student and auto loans, and debt consolidation are just a few examples of credit and loans that people seek online. Peer-to-peer lending services such as Loans Canada and Mogo let investors loan people money without using a bank. However, because investors always want to mitigate risk, a client has asked that you help them predict credit risk with machine learning techniques.
In this assignment you will build and evaluate several machine learning models to predict credit risk using data you'd typically see from peer-to-peer lending services. Credit risk is an inherently imbalanced classification problem (the number of good loans is much larger than the number of at-risk loans), so you will need to employ different techniques for training and evaluating models with imbalanced classes. You will use the imbalanced-learn and Scikit-learn libraries to build and evaluate models using the two following techniques:
Use the imbalanced learn library to resample the LendingClub data and build and evaluate logistic regression classifiers using the resampled data.
To begin:
-
Read the CSV into a DataFrame.
-
Split the data into Training and Testing sets.
-
Scale the training and testing data using the
StandardScaler
fromsklearn.preprocessing
. -
Use the provided code to run a Simple Logistic Regression:
- Fit the
logistic regression classifier
. - Calculate the
balanced accuracy score
. - Display the
confusion matrix
. - Print the
imbalanced classification report
.
- Fit the
Next you will:
-
Oversample the data using the
Naive Random Oversampler
andSMOTE
algorithms. -
Undersample the data using the
Cluster Centroids
algorithm. -
Over- and undersample using a combination
SMOTEENN
algorithm.
For each of the above, you will need to:
-
Train a
logistic regression classifier
fromsklearn.linear_model
using the resampled data. -
Calculate the
balanced accuracy score
fromsklearn.metrics
. -
Display the
confusion matrix
fromsklearn.metrics
. -
Print the
imbalanced classification report
fromimblearn.metrics
.
Use the above to answer the following questions:
- Which model had the best balanced accuracy score?
- Which model had the best recall score?
- Which model had the best geometric mean score?
In this section, you will train and compare two different ensemble classifiers to predict loan risk and evaluate each model. You will use the Balanced Random Forest Classifier and the Easy Ensemble Classifier. Refer to the documentation for each of these to read about the models and see examples of the code.
To begin:
-
Read the data into a DataFrame using the provided starter code.
-
Split the data into training and testing sets.
-
Scale the training and testing data using the
StandardScaler
fromsklearn.preprocessing
.
Then, complete the following steps for each model:
-
Train the model using the quarterly data from LendingClub provided in the
Resource
folder. -
Calculate the balanced accuracy score from
sklearn.metrics
. -
Display the confusion matrix from
sklearn.metrics
. -
Generate a classification report using the
imbalanced_classification_report
from imbalanced learn. -
For the balanced random forest classifier only, print the feature importance sorted in descending order (most important feature to least important) along with the feature score.
Use the above to answer the following questions:
-
Which model had the best balanced accuracy score?
-
Which model had the best recall score?
-
Which model had the best geometric mean score?
-
What are the top three features?
Use the quarterly data from the LendingClub data provided in the Resources
folder. Keep the file in the zipped format and use the starter code to read the file.
Refer to the imbalanced-learn and scikit-learn official documentation for help with training the models. Remember that these models all use the model->fit->predict API.
For the ensemble learners, use 100 estimators for both models.
-
Create Jupyter notebooks for the homework and host the notebooks on GitHub.
-
Include a markdown that summarizes your homework and include this report in your GitHub repository.
-
Submit the link to your GitHub project to Bootcamp Spot.
- Oversample the data using the Naive Random Oversampler and SMOTE algorithms. (5 points)
- Undersample the data using the Cluster Centroids algorithm. (5 points)
- Oversample and undersample the data using the SMOTEENN algorithim. (5 points)
- Generate the Balance Accuracy Score, Confusion Matrix and Classification Report for all of the above methods. (5 points)
- Determine which resampling model has the Best Balanced Accuracy Score. (5 points)
- Determine which resampling model has the Best Recall Score Model. (5 points)
- Determine which resampling model has the Best Geometric Mean Score. (5 points)
- Train the Balanced Random Forest and Easy ensemble Classifiers using the Quarterly Data. (4 points)
- Calculate the Balance Accuracy Score using sklearn.metrics. (4 points)
- Print the Confusion Matrix using sklearn.metrics. (4 points)
- Generate the Classification Report using the
imbalanced_classification_report
from imbalanced learn. (4 points) - Print the Feature Importance with the Feature Score, sorted in descending order, for the Balanced Random Forest Classifier. (4 points)
- Determine which ensemble model has the Best Balanced Accuracy Score. (4 points)
- Determine which ensemble model has the Best Recall Score. (4 points)
- Determine which ensemble model has the Best Geometric Mean Score. (4 points)
- Determine the Top Three Features. (3 points)
- Place imports at the beginning of the file, just after any module comments and docstrings and before module globals and constants. (3 points)
- Name functions and variables with lowercase characters and with words separated by underscores. (2 points)
- Follow Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principles by creating maintainable and reusable code. (3 points)
- Use concise logic and creative engineering where possible. (2 points)
- Submit a link to a GitHub repository that’s cloned to your local machine and contains your files. (5 points)
- Include appropriate commit messages in your files. (5 points)
- Be well commented with concise, relevant notes that other developers can understand. (10 points)
© 2021 Trilogy Education Services, a 2U, Inc. brand. All Rights Reserved.