Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Website] Better naming of specs and linking #42

Open
cconcolato opened this issue Aug 23, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #51
Open

[Website] Better naming of specs and linking #42

cconcolato opened this issue Aug 23, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #51
Labels
enhancement New feature or request inconsistent data Inconsistency between specification data and the data in this repository

Comments

@cconcolato
Copy link
Contributor

The current list of specs (in the main page or in the coverage page) is:

ISO/IEC 14496-12 (ISOBMFF): ver7
ISO/IEC 23008-12 (HEIF): ver-1
ISO/IEC 14496-15 (NALu): ver5
ISO/IEC 14496-30 (Timed Text): ver-1
ISO/IEC 14496-14 (MP4): ver-1

Instead of "ver7", make it explicit "7th Edition".
Also, "ver-1" is not clear if this means "1st Edition" or no version (-1).
It would be good to add the date of the spec. For example 14496-12 7th edition is the 2022 edition (see https://www.iso.org/standard/83102.html).
It would be good to link the specs to this page https://github.com/MPEGGroup/FileFormat/blob/master/DocumentStatus.md so that people have direct links to download them (either from MPEG document management system if they are member, or from ISO's portal otherwise).

@podborski podborski added enhancement New feature or request inconsistent data Inconsistency between specification data and the data in this repository labels Aug 30, 2023
@DenizUgur
Copy link
Collaborator

Also, "ver-1" is not clear if this means "1st Edition" or no version (-1).

Right now, -1 means missing data. If there are cases where version or date may not be available then we would have to construct the text displayed on the component conditionally.

@podborski
Copy link
Member

I will re-open this one since we still need to fill out the metadata to avoid all the -1s on the page.

@podborski podborski reopened this Aug 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request inconsistent data Inconsistency between specification data and the data in this repository
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants