You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
CO2 slowly builds up in the atmosphere. The current (fixed) scaling highlights seasonal variations in recent years, but does a poor job visualizing data going back further. The example below shows CO2 from 2015. The data is off the scale. (see NASA-IMPACT/covid-api#143 for more examples)
Adjusting scale
The science teams have requested to use yearly min/max values to make the seasonal cycles more apparent. Questions we need to address:
This comes with its own set of usability challenges. How do we communicate changes in scale to the user? A user comparing data from 2015 with 2021, may see the same picture, but with different underlying values. Is this a problem if they are just interested in distribution and seasonal cycles, as opposed to growth over time?
is it useful to show two different takes on the product? One that highlights seasonal cycles, versus one that highlights the steady growth over time?
are there more products that have the same use case?
CO2 slowly builds up in the atmosphere. The current (fixed) scaling highlights seasonal variations in recent years, but does a poor job visualizing data going back further. The example below shows CO2 from 2015. The data is off the scale. (see NASA-IMPACT/covid-api#143 for more examples)
Adjusting scale
The science teams have requested to use yearly min/max values to make the seasonal cycles more apparent. Questions we need to address:
cc @leothomas @ricardoduplos
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: