You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The documentation at NCPI FHIR IG Module: Phenotype Condition states that "is used to represent a condition or phenotype linked to a patient in a study. This means that the patient must have an assertion (status) for the given diagnosis." However, it does not mention other important measurements, such as the FEV1/FVC z-score used in the ICAC study.
Please see an example Dataset below. We see some issues of representing the following data in NCPI Condition. For example, NCPI Condition requries "assertion". For many of the dbGaP variable, those will all be "unknown". In fact, majority of dbGaP phenotype dataset data will not have "assertion" and will all be "unknown" for this field. Seemed less than idea to be represented this way. Currently, we are using Observation to represent the data.
The NCPI Condition needs to accommodate datasets similar to the one from the ICAC study (available at NCBI):
Variable Accession
Variable Name
Variable Description
phv00508492.v1.p1
SUBJECT_ID
Subject ID
phv00508493.v1.p1
STUDY
Name of study
phv00508494.v1.p1
ASTHMA
Asthma status
phv00508495.v1.p1
SEX
Sex
phv00508496.v1.p1
RACE
Race by parent report
phv00508497.v1.p1
SITE
Site
phv00508498.v1.p1
FEV1_PRED_SCR
FEV1 % predicted
phv00508499.v1.p1
INT_RESID_FEV1_PRED_SCR
FEV1 % predicted (adjusted, normalized)
phv00508500.v1.p1
AGE_FEV1_PRED_SCR
Age when FEV1 % predicted collected
phv00508501.v1.p1
FEVFVC_Z
FEV1/FVC z-score
phv00508502.v1.p1
INT_RESID_FEVFVC_Z
FEV1/FVC (adjusted, normalized)
phv00508503.v1.p1
AGE_FEVFVC_Z
Age when FEV1/FVC collected
phv00508504.v1.p1
NICALERT_RESULT_SCR
Nicalert test result of cotinine equivalents (urine)
phv00508505.v1.p1
AGE_NICALERT_RESULT_SCR
Age when Nicalert test collected
phv00508506.v1.p1
PC1
PC1
phv00508507.v1.p1
PC2
PC2
phv00508508.v1.p1
PC3
PC3
phv00508509.v1.p1
PC4
PC4
phv00508510.v1.p1
PC5
PC5
phv00508511.v1.p1
PC6
PC6
Is this feedback implementation-blocking?
Yes, this issue will block implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Link to Profile
https://nih-ncpi.github.io/ncpi-fhir-ig-2/StructureDefinition-ncpi-condition.html
Feedback Submission
The documentation at NCPI FHIR IG Module: Phenotype Condition states that "is used to represent a condition or phenotype linked to a patient in a study. This means that the patient must have an assertion (status) for the given diagnosis." However, it does not mention other important measurements, such as the FEV1/FVC z-score used in the ICAC study.
Please see an example Dataset below. We see some issues of representing the following data in NCPI Condition. For example, NCPI Condition requries "assertion". For many of the dbGaP variable, those will all be "unknown". In fact, majority of dbGaP phenotype dataset data will not have "assertion" and will all be "unknown" for this field. Seemed less than idea to be represented this way. Currently, we are using Observation to represent the data.
The NCPI Condition needs to accommodate datasets similar to the one from the ICAC study (available at NCBI):
Is this feedback implementation-blocking?
Yes, this issue will block implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: