Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[QUESTION] Parallax bump mapping for Shadow of Chernobyl? #495

Open
Sol1vaN opened this issue Nov 24, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

[QUESTION] Parallax bump mapping for Shadow of Chernobyl? #495

Sol1vaN opened this issue Nov 24, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@Sol1vaN
Copy link

Sol1vaN commented Nov 24, 2024

I've noticed that on DX9 vanilla 1.0006 with global illumination and all setting at max, the textures looks awesome.
But with DX11 seems the parallax is not present.

There's a way to enable this on OGSR?

Comparatives:

SOC DX9 1.0006
ss_raider_11-24-24_15-46-18_(l01_escape)
ss_raider_11-24-24_15-46-05_(l01_escape)

SOC OGSR DX11 6 nov 2024 release
ss_raider_11-24-24_18-14-31_(l01_escape)
ss_raider_11-24-24_19-15-39_(l01_escape)

Cheers.

@PRXPHET
Copy link
Contributor

PRXPHET commented Nov 25, 2024

Afaik terrain parallax is not available in this version of the engine. Planned to change it to terrain parallax from Screen Space Shaders v20.2.

@solbjorn
Copy link

Check

r_terrain_parallax_enable on

in your user.ltx. It's disabled by default to avoid artifacts on vanilla textures.
And make sure that the textures you want to be parallaxed has parallax[yes] attribute in textures.ltx.

BTW vanilla SoC doesn't have real parallax, it's just distorted bump mapping (with too much gloss as on your screenshots).

@Sol1vaN
Copy link
Author

Sol1vaN commented Nov 28, 2024

thanks, but there's no r_terrain_parallax_enable cvar on user.ltx
user.ltx.txt

in game the r_terrain_parallax_enable is not recognized.
seems the only way is to wait the next v20.2 release

@joye-ramone
Copy link
Member

r_terrain_parallax_enable was removed in last release
so yes - just wait for next release

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants