Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Global Energy Monitor: Location versus Unit/Phase ID #215

Open
leostimpfle opened this issue Jan 13, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Global Energy Monitor: Location versus Unit/Phase ID #215

leostimpfle opened this issue Jan 13, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@leostimpfle
Copy link

How does powerplantmatching decide if the pojectID refers to a plant's GEM location ID or GEM unit/phase ID?

For example, for the Staudinger power plant there are two units: The coal-fired unit has a list of GEM unit/phase IDs ('G100000109620', 'G100000109621', 'G100000109623', 'G100000109622') while the gas-fired unit is linked to the plant's GEM location ID ('L100000101908'). What is the underlying methodology for this matching?

import powerplantmatching as pm
df = pm.powerplants(from_url=True)

plant_name = 'Staudinger'
df.loc[df['Name']==plant_name, 'projectID']
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant