-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
capacity_factor too high for offwind #15
Comments
Transferring from PyPSA/pypsa-ariadne#188 : In the latest 3H run (Elec scenario) we get the following trajectory for the CF:
That's still on the high side. I wonder why we see the jump between 2020 and 2025. Relatedly, there is still #15. It has been mostly adressed by PyPSA/pypsa-ariadne#171 but the scaling for the wake effects remains active and leads to an underestimation of the required grid capacity. So:
|
Tom said we can live with being on the high side of CFs with 0.51. The jump from 2020 to 2025 is still strange, but probably a minor issue |
We were seeing too high capacity_factors for Offwind with weather year 2013 (still testing for 2019). That's probably due to too high wind speeds from atlite. They should be corrected by a scaling factor.
We already implemented a scaling for wake effects in wind parks. As a consequence the maximum power output of windfarms is reduced to 88.5% of their nominal capacity. This way we will probably see less grid expansion.
Adding another sacling of the capacity to account for overestimated wind speeds would lead to even less maximum output and even less grid expansion.
Therefore we should scale the windspeeds directly in atlite.
This has been discussed in PyPSA/pypsa-eur#153 as well
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: