You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@GusRiva and I were chatting about ways of properly documenting that an issue has been (or is in the process of being) discussed by council (during a F2F or in regular meetings) -- while we do often summarize results of a discussion, those comments do not replicate the full scope of the discussion, which is detailed much more expansively in the minutes. However, it's not always clear which issues have been mentioned in the minutes.
Now that the minutes are all going to be in Markdown, we think that there could be a way to automate a kind of notification system that a ticket was indeed discussed; maybe a GitHub action that runs on a new document and writes a comment on each issue? Or does it create an issue (in what repo?) that simply lists it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@joeytakeda@GusRiva Do you think the current manner of linking from minutes direct to issues will work for this automation? I am wondering if the GitHub Action needs to be on the Guidelines repo to read the minutes... Also, eager to try this out as it will make our ticket triaging a lot easier!
I think so long as the link is in the form: https://github.com/ORG/REPO/issue/NUMBER, then we should be able to extract it fairly easily. The automation can be on any repo and will cross-reference properly, so I think it makes most sense for it to be on this repository since that will probably be easiest/most straightforward.
@GusRiva and I were chatting about ways of properly documenting that an issue has been (or is in the process of being) discussed by council (during a F2F or in regular meetings) -- while we do often summarize results of a discussion, those comments do not replicate the full scope of the discussion, which is detailed much more expansively in the minutes. However, it's not always clear which issues have been mentioned in the minutes.
Now that the minutes are all going to be in Markdown, we think that there could be a way to automate a kind of notification system that a ticket was indeed discussed; maybe a GitHub action that runs on a new document and writes a comment on each issue? Or does it create an issue (in what repo?) that simply lists it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: