Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add way of linking issues in minutes #14

Open
joeytakeda opened this issue Oct 8, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Add way of linking issues in minutes #14

joeytakeda opened this issue Oct 8, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@joeytakeda
Copy link
Contributor

@GusRiva and I were chatting about ways of properly documenting that an issue has been (or is in the process of being) discussed by council (during a F2F or in regular meetings) -- while we do often summarize results of a discussion, those comments do not replicate the full scope of the discussion, which is detailed much more expansively in the minutes. However, it's not always clear which issues have been mentioned in the minutes.

Now that the minutes are all going to be in Markdown, we think that there could be a way to automate a kind of notification system that a ticket was indeed discussed; maybe a GitHub action that runs on a new document and writes a comment on each issue? Or does it create an issue (in what repo?) that simply lists it?

@ebeshero
Copy link
Member

ebeshero commented Nov 3, 2024

@joeytakeda @GusRiva Do you think the current manner of linking from minutes direct to issues will work for this automation? I am wondering if the GitHub Action needs to be on the Guidelines repo to read the minutes... Also, eager to try this out as it will make our ticket triaging a lot easier!

@joeytakeda
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think so long as the link is in the form: https://github.com/ORG/REPO/issue/NUMBER, then we should be able to extract it fairly easily. The automation can be on any repo and will cross-reference properly, so I think it makes most sense for it to be on this repository since that will probably be easiest/most straightforward.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants