📊 Improving Analysis Code

[dpshelio]

Open the repository for this exercise. You will find a brief description of each example in its README.md file.

1. Discuss the code with your group. What problems do you see with it? Why?
2. Write below your comments mentioning your group number. For now, focus on the
   problems, and don't make any changes yet!

[slmo85]

Group 9
the code is repetitive (open data1, open data2), the variable names are ambiguous/unhelpful, there's a section of code commented out in workflow2 that doesnt have any comments explaining why, if it will be used again, if it works/doesnt.
they also import everything from math and then dont use it

[SarahLittlejohn]

Group 8

• Variable names especially the 1 character ones.
• Repetition in code - e.g. the read in function for files shouldn't be repeated (could e make into one function).
• The two files are really similar - instead of commenting out the part of the code that is different you could use an if statement instead.
• File names also not great.
• Not enough comments.