Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve harmonization template #79

Open
cristinamullin opened this issue May 6, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Improve harmonization template #79

cristinamullin opened this issue May 6, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@cristinamullin
Copy link
Collaborator

cristinamullin commented May 6, 2022

Review the following to improve the harmonization template:

Review the attached document and Excel workbook to help standardize how we might harmonize nutrient data. This work was done for NSTEPS projects for OW/OST/HECD and is led by Jacques Oliver and Galen Kaufman in HECD. Reach out to them with any additional questions. The excel workbook has that master crosswalk table in it. See the TEMPLATE tab.

Nutrient and Response Variable Data Processing - (11-3-2015).docx
Nutrient_Response_Lookup_Tables - (10-19-2015).xlsx

@cristinamullin cristinamullin changed the title update harmonization template Improve harmonization template Oct 2, 2023
@cristinamullin cristinamullin added the Good First Issue Good issue for first time contributors label Nov 13, 2023
@cristinamullin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Datastream Metals Guidance Draft 20231106.docx

Review metals guidance documents from Datastream (attached, see Fig 1 in particualr) and WQX : https://www.epa.gov/waterdata/wqx-metals-best-practices-guide

  • Unfiltered (dissolved + suspended/particulate)
  • Filtered (dissolved, pot. dissolved)
  • Particulate (suspended)

Consider changing TADA harmonization file defaults to best align with guidance and best practices.

@cristinamullin cristinamullin removed the Good First Issue Good issue for first time contributors label Oct 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant