You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Like @3xp0rt mentioned in #855 , we should be tool/framework agnostic and provide the data so that the downstream tools can parse or ignore as their capabilities allow.
My thought is to add a single element protection to the schema. It would have several values like:
cloudflare = Meaning the site is behind CloudFlare's protections
userauth = Meaning that a tool may need to authenticate to the site as a valid user to check this entry.
captcha = Meaning the site employs some kind of CAPTCHA that may prevent some automated tools from being successful
multiple = The site may use multiple defensive measures.
other = Anything else
Tool makers could ignore this field and just try to check the site or, if they use certain evasion/checking techniques, could change tool behavior to be more successful in checking the site.
I would be interested in people's thoughts here. And thanks for thinking about this @3xp0rt.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Like @3xp0rt mentioned in #855 , we should be tool/framework agnostic and provide the data so that the downstream tools can parse or ignore as their capabilities allow.
My thought is to add a single element
protection
to the schema. It would have several values like:cloudflare
= Meaning the site is behind CloudFlare's protectionsuserauth
= Meaning that a tool may need to authenticate to the site as a valid user to check this entry.captcha
= Meaning the site employs some kind of CAPTCHA that may prevent some automated tools from being successfulmultiple
= The site may use multiple defensive measures.other
= Anything elseTool makers could ignore this field and just try to check the site or, if they use certain evasion/checking techniques, could change tool behavior to be more successful in checking the site.
I would be interested in people's thoughts here. And thanks for thinking about this @3xp0rt.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: