You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The issue is most for my own documentation of the process.
Short description of the problem: The qt/serviceHelper.py does have 3 licenses and it is not clear which lines belong to which license.
I have feedback from a Debian Developer that this make things harder for them.
MIT
About the MIT license part related to dbus-python (python-dbus-docs). These are code snippets from the docu which is licensed as MIT. It is unclear if the code snippets themself are covered by this license. I hope to get a clear statement from that project that we can use that snippets and re-license them as GPL-2.0-or-later.
Introduction
The issue is most for my own documentation of the process.
Short description of the problem: The
qt/serviceHelper.py
does have 3 licenses and it is not clear which lines belong to which license.I have feedback from a Debian Developer that this make things harder for them.
MIT
About the MIT license part related to
dbus-python
(python-dbus-docs
). These are code snippets from the docu which is licensed as MIT. It is unclear if the code snippets themself are covered by this license. I hope to get a clear statement from that project that we can use that snippets and re-license them as GPL-2.0-or-later.CC0 / Public domain
To my understanding it is no problem to re-license public domain code even if we are not the authors.
Summary
If we could get rid of the MIT license, we can re-license the whole file as GPL-2.0-or-later and thats it.
Header of
serviceHelper.py
backintime/qt/serviceHelper.py
Lines 1 to 57 in 7f96e5e
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: