You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have already raised an issue and expressed that there are serious image and text inconsistencies in data_engine data. The author's reply is that cambrian only provides method reference.
But my concern is that the seriousness of the inconsistency between the pictures and texts in the data_engine part is not just whether the details of the text and pictures correspond, but that the text and pictures are not the same topic at all. I think such data cannot prove that cambrian has proposed a valuable data production tool.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Or is it that the corresponding relationship between annotation and image was recorded incorrectly when the data was uploaded? I hope the author can pay attention to this issue and double check the data quality.
I have already raised an issue and expressed that there are serious image and text inconsistencies in data_engine data. The author's reply is that cambrian only provides method reference.
But my concern is that the seriousness of the inconsistency between the pictures and texts in the data_engine part is not just whether the details of the text and pictures correspond, but that the text and pictures are not the same topic at all. I think such data cannot prove that cambrian has proposed a valuable data production tool.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: