Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

multi-process support: dpdk app as primary / capsule as secondary #34

Closed
zeeshanlakhani opened this issue Nov 25, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@zeeshanlakhani
Copy link
Member

zeeshanlakhani commented Nov 25, 2019

Background

As per discussion with @capsule-rs/maintainers, we'd like to have a good example leveraging DPDK's multi-process support, with a Capsule app being a secondary process.

One idea would involve a non-capsule primary DPDK application (e.g maybe testpmd, or something else?) that generates packets and forwards those packets to a secondary Capsule-written NF. Though, an issue here is be aware that both processes need to share the same DPDK versions.

The main use case we've seen usually revolves around Open vSwitch being the primary process with other secondary process in something like Capsule, etc...

@zeeshanlakhani zeeshanlakhani added the example Additional example to add/contribute label Nov 25, 2019
@zeeshanlakhani zeeshanlakhani changed the title Add example showcasing multi-proc (i.e. secondary) support Add example showcasing multi-process (i.e. secondary) support Apr 8, 2020
@zeeshanlakhani zeeshanlakhani added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 8, 2020
@zeeshanlakhani zeeshanlakhani removed the example Additional example to add/contribute label Apr 29, 2020
@zeeshanlakhani zeeshanlakhani changed the title Add example showcasing multi-process (i.e. secondary) support multi-process, capsule as secondary, support Apr 29, 2020
@zeeshanlakhani zeeshanlakhani changed the title multi-process, capsule as secondary, support multi-process support: dpdk app as primary / capsule as secondary Apr 29, 2020
@zeeshanlakhani
Copy link
Member Author

closing in favor #74.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant