You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Following up on discussions in the office, we should test the perturbation effect of a vector of random noise in the model. Specifically, we should look at feature importance and the stability of estimates.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@dfsnow We are also probably going to have a decent number of comparisons / test etc. Do we want to have some set parameters or a baseline to test these things against throughout the modeling season?
@dfsnow do we want this in something like the equivalent of an EI-issue? Where should it be stored? The same question for #273
For something like this issue, I think it's sufficient to just post findings in the issue comments (including any supporting tables and plots). No need for separate analyses.
@dfsnow We are also probably going to have a decent number of comparisons / test etc. Do we want to have some set parameters or a baseline to test these things against throughout the modeling season?
We'll run a baseline model as soon as #263 is merged. We can use that for comparison for now (until we have 2024 data).
Following up on discussions in the office, we should test the perturbation effect of a vector of random noise in the model. Specifically, we should look at feature importance and the stability of estimates.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: