Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
85 lines (73 loc) · 3.67 KB

2023-02-21-episode-64.md

File metadata and controls

85 lines (73 loc) · 3.67 KB
posted guid title subtitle description start-time itunes-explicit itunes-episode itunes-episodeType youtube-full discussion timeline enclosure-url enclosure-length enclosure-type itunes-duration participants
true
98B34BA2-4B52-44F9-BCDB-B5897018C419
Community validator
Tokens for tracking participation
In this episode, we focus on the structure of community applications with event ticketing and promises. We dive into validating participation and scoring the fulfillment of these promises in a Web3 way, discussing potential issues such as griefing attacks and vote delegation. We also chat about using ChatGPT for admin work and announce the second part of our "Zero Day Live" mini-series.
2023-05-09T18:00:00-04:00
false
64
full
seconds title
0
Intro
seconds title
37
The new homepage
seconds title
81
Perks and promises
seconds title
215
Verified review
seconds title
333
Who reviews the reviewers?
seconds title
544
Can rules-based systems ever be fair?
seconds title
648
Using ChatGPT for admin work
20524874
audio/x-m4a
977
fulldecent
dtedesco1
exstalis
037
vjdeliria
rito_rhymes
cryptonerdylady

NOTES

  • (Elif) community account, perks (free drinks, social events, airdrops), promises (commitment to the community)
  • If someone violated something in the community (i.e. promised to teach something, but didn’t do it)
  • Tickets (gets right to review, organizer cannot see, only ticketholders can see)
  • Attack scenario: community A, community B, community B member gets ticket for community A event?
  • A community includes individuals and community accounts (multi-sig), both of who can be organizer and create an event.
  • The event is a meetup and is ticketed.
  • A community member can make a promise ("tag", commitment) to do something. The promise is upvoted/downvoted by other eligible community members (based on voting power from event attendance, score from earned tags).
  • Question: how to validate who attended the event? give them a drip.
  • Question: how to use neural programming ("AI") to classify text as positive or negative sentiment?
  • Possible solutions for trust
    • Scaffolding – trusted validators
    • Anyone can validate – but it’s public

TWITTER THREAD

  • Thank you for joining episode #64!

    First, looking at a common #community-building Web3 problem…

  • @elif describes a community application focused around event ticketing and promises to participate in these events… how can validate participation and score/attest to fulfillment of these promises? Can we do it in a #Web3 way?

  • Does upvoting/downvoting lead to griefing attacks? And who gets votes?

  • Hands-on review using #ChatGPT to do mechanical (but also cognitive) knowledge work.

  • Part 2 of the 3-part mini series "Zero Day Live" just dropped https://twitter.com/fulldecent/status/1627497192888889346 #zeroday