You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am interested in getting the overall contribution of each environment source to a sink. For this reason I tried out your demo data with the following R script, by running it 100 times and then parsing the results per sink.
Knowing that FEAST is not a deterministic method, and that there is some expected variability in the results, I wanted to ask you why the results for certain samples vary so much (ex: ERR525698_Env_1). I've attached the results for two of the iterations I calculated (demo90_source_contributions_matrix.txt demo0_source_contributions_matrix.txt).
As you see I always used the same parameters and input data. However, the contribution of Env_2 for the sink mentioned (ERR525698_Env_1) is 0.008 in one iteration and in the other one is 0.798. And this occurs with several other samples.
Is this an expected behaviour?
FEAST version: FEAST_0.1.0
Thank you 👍🏾
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have just tried out with the demo dataset and am getting the same issue in plotting step as @Yixiangzhang1996 . Any updates on this? or suggestions on other code / tutorial datasets to look at to get familiar with using this tool? Thanks ;)
Hi!
I am interested in getting the overall contribution of each environment source to a sink. For this reason I tried out your demo data with the following R script, by running it 100 times and then parsing the results per sink.
Knowing that FEAST is not a deterministic method, and that there is some expected variability in the results, I wanted to ask you why the results for certain samples vary so much (ex: ERR525698_Env_1). I've attached the results for two of the iterations I calculated (demo90_source_contributions_matrix.txt
demo0_source_contributions_matrix.txt).
As you see I always used the same parameters and input data. However, the contribution of Env_2 for the sink mentioned (ERR525698_Env_1) is 0.008 in one iteration and in the other one is 0.798. And this occurs with several other samples.
Is this an expected behaviour?
FEAST version: FEAST_0.1.0
Thank you 👍🏾
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: