You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is another notation for feet, ' (ASCII apostrophe), that is 40 times more common on length-related keys in general (including common keys such as height=*). The “Units” page on the wiki encourages the ##'##" notation and strongly discourages ft or in.
On the other hand, the ele=* documentation currently discourages unit specifications altogether. Despite this longstanding guideline, several major data consumers support both ft and ' for specifying elevations in feet. This proposal would codify that option for mappers. It doesn’t prefer one notation over the other, but perhaps you might consider adding support for ' for completeness.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
checkele()
currently recognizesft
as the notation for feet withinele=*
, converting it to meters:OpenTopoMap/mapnik/tools/isolation.c
Line 65 in e4467cf
OpenTopoMap/mapnik/tools/isolation.c
Line 78 in e4467cf
There is another notation for feet,
'
(ASCII apostrophe), that is 40 times more common on length-related keys in general (including common keys such asheight=*
). The “Units” page on the wiki encourages the##'##"
notation and strongly discouragesft
orin
.On the other hand, the
ele=*
documentation currently discourages unit specifications altogether. Despite this longstanding guideline, several major data consumers support bothft
and'
for specifying elevations in feet. This proposal would codify that option for mappers. It doesn’t prefer one notation over the other, but perhaps you might consider adding support for'
for completeness.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: