Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IMPROVEMENT: replace References with IsSupplementedBy for auxilliary semantics #208

Open
agy-why opened this issue Aug 25, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@agy-why
Copy link
Member

agy-why commented Aug 25, 2023

The #auxilliary semantics from IVOA datalink (https://www.ivoa.net/rdf/datalink/core/2022-01-27/datalink.html) refers to the References relationType from datacite 4.4 (https://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.4/doc/DataCite-MetadataKernel_v4.4.pdf).

From the definition of References: Indicates that B is a source of information for A it does fit. However from the usage it seems it fits better for citation of articles, not for data publication.

However another relationType: IsSupplementedBy defined as: Indicate that B is a supplement to A (recommanded for discovery) seems to better fit, since we use the datalink semantic #auxilliary for discovery purposes.

So I suggest to change our implementation and replace the relationType of the OAI entries referred as #auxilliary to IsSupplementedBy instead of References.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant