[Question] Would it be possible to make ulid::Generator::new() const?

[emkw]

Would it be possible to make ulid::Generator::new() const?

That could be used to statically initialize it, so it wouldn't require lazy initialization.

[dylanhart]

Looks like that would be an easy change. Feel free to send a patch

…

On Thu, Oct 24, 2024, 10:48 AM emkw ***@***.***> wrote: Would it be possible to make ulid::Generator::new() const? That could be used to statically initialize it, so it wouldn't require lazy initialization. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#83>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAOAOYZRPRGL3NUTPOCX5BDZ5EXIJAVCNFSM6AAAAABQRTXWCKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGYYTEMRSGY2DCNQ> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[emkw]

Just to make sure - aren't there any future assumptions about generator initialization that const could make problematic?

[dylanhart]

I doubt. The only thing that would be non-const would the RNG but that's being passed to generate with the current API.