Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

BGE profile: compare the list of properties/metadata to existing types/properties in Bioschemas and COPO #95

Open
Tracked by #94
elichad opened this issue Dec 17, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Tracked by #94

BGE profile: compare the list of properties/metadata to existing types/properties in Bioschemas and COPO #95

elichad opened this issue Dec 17, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@nsjuty @elichad

Comments

@elichad
Copy link

elichad commented Dec 17, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Compare the list of properties/metadata required/recommended for BGE to existing types/properties in Bioschemas (Sample, Biosample, LabProcess, LabProtocol, ComputationalWorkflow) and COPO (~ Feb 2025)

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1w2Gp0UNfE-CsDeNb-UX3RCr0rGXztcToahcU2F0UHZ0/edit?tab=t.0
@elichad elichad mentioned this issue Dec 17, 2024
Open
7 tasks
@elichad elichad changed the title Compare the list of properties/metadata required/recommended for BGE to existing types/properties in Bioschemas (Sample, Biosample, LabProcess, LabProtocol, ComputationalWorkflow) and COPO (~ Feb 2025) BGE profile: compare the list of properties/metadata existing types/properties in Bioschemas and COPO Dec 17, 2024
@elichad elichad changed the title BGE profile: compare the list of properties/metadata existing types/properties in Bioschemas and COPO BGE profile: compare the list of properties/metadata to existing types/properties in Bioschemas and COPO Dec 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@nsjuty nsjuty

@elichad elichad

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@nsjuty @elichad