Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do we need a pattern for general service/page feedback? #13

Open
khawkins98 opened this issue Oct 17, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Do we need a pattern for general service/page feedback? #13

khawkins98 opened this issue Oct 17, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@khawkins98
Copy link
Contributor

khawkins98 commented Oct 17, 2016

Moved on behalf of @gabsie from ebiwd/EBI-Framework#6

This has been raised as a ticket before from different services (ENA/Expression Atlas), and a functionality for quick contextual feedback can be developed as a pattern and applied throughout the services pages..

Like on www.gov.uk - at the bottom of every page - there is a
"Is there anything wrong with this page" link, which opens up a very specific form to help users report issues.

Let's discuss!

screen shot 2016-06-02 at 16 53 35

Another example for contextual feedback opportunity: mixcloud

screen shot 2016-06-03 at 10 08 49

@khawkins98
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is a long-standing itch and I've been giving it some thought.

Two large areas of comment:

  1. An implementation idea
    image
    A pattern that could work well both functionally and within the framework would be a slide-under ribbon that appears similar to the cookie bar. This could be invoke on a portion of visits (say 5% of users) and at various points on the page (top/middle/bottom, or time 5 seconds, 10 sec, etc)

The user feedback could be Happy/OK/Sad with emoji faces.

And result+metadata logged to Google Analytics

  1. Will it float?
    Wikimedia(pedia) has recently dropped a similar user-feedback method (MoodBar) after several years of not seeing much good data from it. I think this is part due to the audience (passive readers vs engaged editors) and a dated implantation largely unchanged from 2011.

Our pattern could be more contemporary and our users more suitable.

Irregardless, Wikimedia's effort is valuable insight and offers a wealth of data and UX design:
Research

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant