-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Infinium MethylationEPIC v2.0 Kit #46
Comments
Hi, I'm implementing EPIC v2 compatibility for RnBeads. The package will soon be officially updated. |
Many thanks! |
The current release cannot generate correct QC report and get wrong filter on type II probes (""unreliable measurements") on EPIC v2.0 data. Hope the new release can fix those. BTW, when will the new release with v2.0 support be available? Thanks. |
Hi @haiqingli , you can expect EPIC v2 support in RnBeads sometime next month. We will also publish an updated annotation package. |
Dear @jozsefkun and @haiqingli, You can use the links below for a preview version of RnBeads with EPICv2 compatibility. You need to install the updated RnBeads.hg38 package and the RnBeads package. We would greatly appreciate your feedback after you've tried this version of RnBeads! EPICv2 compatible RnBeads: Please keep in mind that this version of RnBeads is intended only to test EPICv2 data and is not tested with the previous Illumina platforms. Implementation for full compatibility is in progress. |
@bariskalem Thank you for letting us know. Will give it a try in the coming weeks. |
issue#1: I have no problem running "rnb.run.preprocessing". But if I break it down to "rnb.execute.normalization", it generated error "Error in rnb.get.annotation("controlsEPICv2") :unsupported annotation type" and the filtering step before "rnb.execute.greedycut" generated an empty file. |
issue#5: plotting issue running "rnb.plot.locus.profile(rnb,chrom,start,end,grps=sample.grouping)" |
Hi everyone, we now have an updated annotation package that can be downloaded by this link: RnBeads also received an update so it supports the annotation package, make sure to update RnBeads as well: https://github.com/epigen/RnBeads/tree/feature/EPICv2 |
Hi @VivianBailey , Thank you for informing us about these issues! 1st issue:Should be addressed by this new update. 2nd issue:The 3rd issue:Make sure the SNP probe ID you are giving is a IlmnID. Example: "rs213028_BC11”.
4th issue:I was not able to reproduce this issue. My guess is that your script is trying to create a directory that already exists. If you provide more information regarding your analysis script we could try once again to solve your problem. 5th issue:I suspect this issue to be one that is unrelated to the EPICv2 compatibility update. I hope these suggestions help. |
3rd issue: here is my code |
4th issue: "rnb.run.qc" works in CNV estimation using "rnb.run.qc(rnb.set.unfiltered,dir.reports=report.dir)" but the Sex prediction plot wasn't created. I tried the following two options. |
6th question: how to get and RnBset object after rnb.execute.greedycut? The example uses rnb.execute.greedycut(rnb.set.filtered)$dataset,but I only saw info, statistics, iteration, sites and samples. |
7th issue: Error in log10(lolaRes[["qValue"]]) : non-numeric argument to mathematical function when running lolaBarPlot |
Hello, rnb.options(filtering.sex.chromosomes.removal = TRUE, identifiers.column = "barcode", import.idat.platform = "auto") The rnb.set only contains 866895 CpGs like the rnbset created with 850k data. So the 935k probe was not detected correctly. What should I change? I can't find any other other suiting options than "auto". Any suggestions? Thank you! |
Hi Marcel, |
Hi @bariskalem, |
Hi @mhack02, |
Hi everyone, thanks for addressing this discussion as I'm also having difficulties with the EPIC V2 analysis. I'm also unable to resolve the RnBeads error message:
despite following all the suggested steps. In the rnb.options, "probesEPICv2" is not listed in the "import.idat.platform" section. |
Hi @LucianoCalzari, That's unexpected! Can you try installing RnBeads using devtools'
The following line shouldn't throw an error: Let us know if the problem persists. |
Hi @bariskalem,
These new Epic V2 will be a nightmare for everyone for a while.. Thank you in advance for your valuable assistance |
Hi @LucianoCalzari , It's really difficult to pinpoint what the issue might be without seeing your analysis script or the First of all, I don't see how you're using this function for your analysis. That might be causing the problem. Again, if you can go ahead and type |
Hi @bariskalem, This is my script: This is my traceback()
Hoping I've done everything you asked... |
Hi @LucianoCalzari , I'm suspecting you did not install the annotation package correctly. Or using an older build. Please download this: https://icbb-share.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/RnBeads/EPICv2/RnBeads_hg38_preview/RnBeads.hg38_1.35.0.tar.gz And then install the package by this line: For good measure, make sure to run Please let me know if that solves the problem. |
Hi @bariskalem, |
@LucianoCalzari no worries, glad we worked it all out! |
Do you know how to combine EPIC and EPICv2 samples in the same analysis? |
You can use the
|
The function return me:
|
Yes. |
I just found this thread, and it is really helpful. I wanted to ask if RnBeads can still annotate to hg19 with EPICv2? I have done a large analysis for hg19, as many of the probes on the array were designed for that genome. The same can still be said for EPICv2 I believe, so if possible I would still like to annotate to hg19 |
Hi Guys, I am also running into an issue with the vanilla analysis during the exploration of the data. Specifically at the Sample Beta Value distributions - Sample Groups. Here is the error I am getting: objc[50984]: +[NSConstantIntegerNumber initialize] may have been in progress in another thread when fork() was called. I tried jrnb.options(exploratory.beta.distribution = FALSE) but it doesnt work in the new nv probe section for EPIC v2. Any advise on how to get around this? |
So just to update, I found out how to turn this off, but I still get this error if I have multiple differential comparison columns, so i need to do one comparison at a time to get the pipeline to work with EPICv2 |
Hi, Illumina discontinued the earlier version of the EPIC array. Can you suggest a way to use RnBeads with EPIC v2.0 data?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: