Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spurious -02 in C3 12 transcript #709

Open
gerritbruening opened this issue Jul 26, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Spurious -02 in C3 12 transcript #709

gerritbruening opened this issue Jul 26, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@gerritbruening
Copy link
Contributor

See faustedition/faust-web#560

We still have spurious -02s in the transcript of C.3 11, see
https://github.com/faustedition/faust-xml/blob/master/xml/print/C(3)12_IIIB27.xml#L42
and the following lines, as well as
https://github.com/faustedition/faust-xml/blob/master/xml/print/C(3)12_IIIB27.xml#L11921
and the following lines.

The first group of images has not been turned but the letter is. Is this difference intended? Can we get rid of these -02s in the transcript, or have they deliberately been kept?

@thvitt
Copy link
Member

thvitt commented Jul 26, 2021

I have not modified the transcript but rather renamed the images to match the references in the transcripts. As a consequence, the images appear also in the currently published version of the edition, as was originally intended.

If you now remove the -02s, we’ll have to rename the images back (including all tiles and metadata) or duplicate or link them …

@thvitt thvitt assigned gerritbruening and unassigned thvitt Jul 26, 2021
@gerritbruening
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hm, can't we get rid of all the -2s, regardless of where they appear?

@thvitt
Copy link
Member

thvitt commented Jul 26, 2021

regardless of where they appear?

?

I won’t modify the references to the images in the versions of the edition that have already been published. (Why do we need to rename the references now, after I implemented the other way to fix the missing images problem? Is there any real benefit?)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants