+
Dynamics across the cell cycle
It is important to keep in mind how chromosome folding changes during cell division. Spatial organization is generally studied in non-synchronous cells, of which interphase cells make up the biggest proportion (Bouwman and Laat 2015).
In interphase, chromosomes are decondensed and hierarchically organized into territories, compartments, and TADs as described above.
To prepare for cell division chromosomes untangle and condense, while transcription ceases almost entirely. Mitotic chromosomes do not show preferential organization, such as compartments or TADs (Naumova et al. 2013). Enhancer-promoter looping might be absent as well (Dekker 2014).
diff --git a/docs/1-6-evolution-of-chromatin-organization.html b/docs/1-6-evolution-of-chromatin-organization.html
index e89c44e..7cf2cd8 100644
--- a/docs/1-6-evolution-of-chromatin-organization.html
+++ b/docs/1-6-evolution-of-chromatin-organization.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/1-7-disruption-of-chromatin-architecture-in-disease.html b/docs/1-7-disruption-of-chromatin-architecture-in-disease.html
index 0155017..d2023fe 100644
--- a/docs/1-7-disruption-of-chromatin-architecture-in-disease.html
+++ b/docs/1-7-disruption-of-chromatin-architecture-in-disease.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/1-8-aims-of-this-thesis.html b/docs/1-8-aims-of-this-thesis.html
index 373b6b2..9316862 100644
--- a/docs/1-8-aims-of-this-thesis.html
+++ b/docs/1-8-aims-of-this-thesis.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/1-9-structure-of-this-thesis.html b/docs/1-9-structure-of-this-thesis.html
index 5811a8a..abe3c56 100644
--- a/docs/1-9-structure-of-this-thesis.html
+++ b/docs/1-9-structure-of-this-thesis.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/1-intro.html b/docs/1-intro.html
index ba8ace8..a13b5c4 100644
--- a/docs/1-intro.html
+++ b/docs/1-intro.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/2-1-introduction.html b/docs/2-1-introduction.html
index df130c4..fec966c 100644
--- a/docs/2-1-introduction.html
+++ b/docs/2-1-introduction.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/2-2-sec-paralog-methods.html b/docs/2-2-sec-paralog-methods.html
index 4299a29..5c9e398 100644
--- a/docs/2-2-sec-paralog-methods.html
+++ b/docs/2-2-sec-paralog-methods.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/2-3-results.html b/docs/2-3-results.html
index 4d6dc04..6f1cd21 100644
--- a/docs/2-3-results.html
+++ b/docs/2-3-results.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/2-4-discussions.html b/docs/2-4-discussions.html
index f760eb6..1fb41a2 100644
--- a/docs/2-4-discussions.html
+++ b/docs/2-4-discussions.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/2-5-conclusion.html b/docs/2-5-conclusion.html
index ea78611..079ea6e 100644
--- a/docs/2-5-conclusion.html
+++ b/docs/2-5-conclusion.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/2-paralog-regulation.html b/docs/2-paralog-regulation.html
index 0407db1..d25b491 100644
--- a/docs/2-paralog-regulation.html
+++ b/docs/2-paralog-regulation.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/3-1-introduction-1.html b/docs/3-1-introduction-1.html
index f57af83..c4df952 100644
--- a/docs/3-1-introduction-1.html
+++ b/docs/3-1-introduction-1.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/3-2-results-1.html b/docs/3-2-results-1.html
index 042c023..83651a7 100644
--- a/docs/3-2-results-1.html
+++ b/docs/3-2-results-1.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/3-3-discussion.html b/docs/3-3-discussion.html
index f69f876..0ac892c 100644
--- a/docs/3-3-discussion.html
+++ b/docs/3-3-discussion.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/3-4-conclusion-1.html b/docs/3-4-conclusion-1.html
index 05cd724..291bd79 100644
--- a/docs/3-4-conclusion-1.html
+++ b/docs/3-4-conclusion-1.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/3-5-methods.html b/docs/3-5-methods.html
index a505fe4..2df1f47 100644
--- a/docs/3-5-methods.html
+++ b/docs/3-5-methods.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/3-TAD-evolution.html b/docs/3-TAD-evolution.html
index 614c09a..7834f84 100644
--- a/docs/3-TAD-evolution.html
+++ b/docs/3-TAD-evolution.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/4-1-introduction-2.html b/docs/4-1-introduction-2.html
index 3820fe5..f6d1bec 100644
--- a/docs/4-1-introduction-2.html
+++ b/docs/4-1-introduction-2.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/4-2-materials-and-methods.html b/docs/4-2-materials-and-methods.html
index c1dbb79..7d2e8ac 100644
--- a/docs/4-2-materials-and-methods.html
+++ b/docs/4-2-materials-and-methods.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/4-3-results-2.html b/docs/4-3-results-2.html
index aecbd44..bb4cf40 100644
--- a/docs/4-3-results-2.html
+++ b/docs/4-3-results-2.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/4-4-discussion-1.html b/docs/4-4-discussion-1.html
index 777a242..09a69d3 100644
--- a/docs/4-4-discussion-1.html
+++ b/docs/4-4-discussion-1.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/4-position-effect.html b/docs/4-position-effect.html
index 8e83704..804c735 100644
--- a/docs/4-position-effect.html
+++ b/docs/4-position-effect.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/5-1-introduction-3.html b/docs/5-1-introduction-3.html
index e6f73b1..c81be38 100644
--- a/docs/5-1-introduction-3.html
+++ b/docs/5-1-introduction-3.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/5-2-results-3.html b/docs/5-2-results-3.html
index b93c052..a206a72 100644
--- a/docs/5-2-results-3.html
+++ b/docs/5-2-results-3.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/5-3-discussion-2.html b/docs/5-3-discussion-2.html
index 808f7a4..4c23ff7 100644
--- a/docs/5-3-discussion-2.html
+++ b/docs/5-3-discussion-2.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/5-4-conclusion-2.html b/docs/5-4-conclusion-2.html
index 2bbfa47..cd06c9a 100644
--- a/docs/5-4-conclusion-2.html
+++ b/docs/5-4-conclusion-2.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/5-5-methods-1.html b/docs/5-5-methods-1.html
index 59e48e8..9586902 100644
--- a/docs/5-5-methods-1.html
+++ b/docs/5-5-methods-1.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/5-loop.html b/docs/5-loop.html
index af9970b..c9f4522 100644
--- a/docs/5-loop.html
+++ b/docs/5-loop.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/6-1-co-regulation-of-functionally-related-genes-in-tads.html b/docs/6-1-co-regulation-of-functionally-related-genes-in-tads.html
index 1efbf67..846c4fc 100644
--- a/docs/6-1-co-regulation-of-functionally-related-genes-in-tads.html
+++ b/docs/6-1-co-regulation-of-functionally-related-genes-in-tads.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/6-2-evolution-by-gene-duplications-and-altered-regulatory-environments.html b/docs/6-2-evolution-by-gene-duplications-and-altered-regulatory-environments.html
index 0ccff33..5fb2b60 100644
--- a/docs/6-2-evolution-by-gene-duplications-and-altered-regulatory-environments.html
+++ b/docs/6-2-evolution-by-gene-duplications-and-altered-regulatory-environments.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/6-3-tads-are-stable-across-large-evolutionary-time-scales.html b/docs/6-3-tads-are-stable-across-large-evolutionary-time-scales.html
index 51e099f..6571058 100644
--- a/docs/6-3-tads-are-stable-across-large-evolutionary-time-scales.html
+++ b/docs/6-3-tads-are-stable-across-large-evolutionary-time-scales.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/6-4-TAD-disease.html b/docs/6-4-TAD-disease.html
index 2e09eea..d984dd4 100644
--- a/docs/6-4-TAD-disease.html
+++ b/docs/6-4-TAD-disease.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/6-5-towards-predicting-regulatory-pathomechanisms-of-structural-variants.html b/docs/6-5-towards-predicting-regulatory-pathomechanisms-of-structural-variants.html
index 6f14af5..c98a7bf 100644
--- a/docs/6-5-towards-predicting-regulatory-pathomechanisms-of-structural-variants.html
+++ b/docs/6-5-towards-predicting-regulatory-pathomechanisms-of-structural-variants.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/6-6-towards-studying-genome-folding-in-specific-conditions.html b/docs/6-6-towards-studying-genome-folding-in-specific-conditions.html
index bb7a42e..3b06120 100644
--- a/docs/6-6-towards-studying-genome-folding-in-specific-conditions.html
+++ b/docs/6-6-towards-studying-genome-folding-in-specific-conditions.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/6-7-molecular-mechanisms-driving-genome-folding.html b/docs/6-7-molecular-mechanisms-driving-genome-folding.html
index 29fa1bb..75fd38a 100644
--- a/docs/6-7-molecular-mechanisms-driving-genome-folding.html
+++ b/docs/6-7-molecular-mechanisms-driving-genome-folding.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/6-8-conclusions.html b/docs/6-8-conclusions.html
index 0a43867..c88eac9 100644
--- a/docs/6-8-conclusions.html
+++ b/docs/6-8-conclusions.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/6-thesis-discussion.html b/docs/6-thesis-discussion.html
index 3748567..4b05aad 100644
--- a/docs/6-thesis-discussion.html
+++ b/docs/6-thesis-discussion.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/A-sup-paralog-regulation.html b/docs/A-sup-paralog-regulation.html
index 2636d60..b2b2e15 100644
--- a/docs/A-sup-paralog-regulation.html
+++ b/docs/A-sup-paralog-regulation.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/B-1-TadEvoSupTab.html b/docs/B-1-TadEvoSupTab.html
index aa5d548..f38eccc 100644
--- a/docs/B-1-TadEvoSupTab.html
+++ b/docs/B-1-TadEvoSupTab.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/B-2-supplementary-figures.html b/docs/B-2-supplementary-figures.html
index 637b484..91dc437 100644
--- a/docs/B-2-supplementary-figures.html
+++ b/docs/B-2-supplementary-figures.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/B-sup-tad-evolution.html b/docs/B-sup-tad-evolution.html
index d02edfb..69c576e 100644
--- a/docs/B-sup-tad-evolution.html
+++ b/docs/B-sup-tad-evolution.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/C-1-supplemental-note.html b/docs/C-1-supplemental-note.html
index cd6eab8..7237cce 100644
--- a/docs/C-1-supplemental-note.html
+++ b/docs/C-1-supplemental-note.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/C-2-supplemental-figure.html b/docs/C-2-supplemental-figure.html
index 510fbe2..e5c5966 100644
--- a/docs/C-2-supplemental-figure.html
+++ b/docs/C-2-supplemental-figure.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/C-3-position-effect-sub-tab.html b/docs/C-3-position-effect-sub-tab.html
index 247d064..f867045 100644
--- a/docs/C-3-position-effect-sub-tab.html
+++ b/docs/C-3-position-effect-sub-tab.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/C-sup-position-effect.html b/docs/C-sup-position-effect.html
index a472850..0630001 100644
--- a/docs/C-sup-position-effect.html
+++ b/docs/C-sup-position-effect.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/D-1-LoopPredSupTab.html b/docs/D-1-LoopPredSupTab.html
index 2c3cec7..452e1d4 100644
--- a/docs/D-1-LoopPredSupTab.html
+++ b/docs/D-1-LoopPredSupTab.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/D-2-supplementary-figures-1.html b/docs/D-2-supplementary-figures-1.html
index 6cb2005..d7bb5bf 100644
--- a/docs/D-2-supplementary-figures-1.html
+++ b/docs/D-2-supplementary-figures-1.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/D-loop-support.html b/docs/D-loop-support.html
index 546f182..d74d9cf 100644
--- a/docs/D-loop-support.html
+++ b/docs/D-loop-support.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/E-contribution-to-individual-publications.html b/docs/E-contribution-to-individual-publications.html
index ef1383d..f58e584 100644
--- a/docs/E-contribution-to-individual-publications.html
+++ b/docs/E-contribution-to-individual-publications.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/acknowledgements-2.html b/docs/acknowledgements-2.html
index 2894259..0e96989 100644
--- a/docs/acknowledgements-2.html
+++ b/docs/acknowledgements-2.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/acknowledgements.html b/docs/acknowledgements.html
index b751d93..73111ec 100644
--- a/docs/acknowledgements.html
+++ b/docs/acknowledgements.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/curriculum-vitae.html b/docs/curriculum-vitae.html
index 1d34c8c..5535cf7 100644
--- a/docs/curriculum-vitae.html
+++ b/docs/curriculum-vitae.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/declarations-1.html b/docs/declarations-1.html
index 108700a..30401f7 100644
--- a/docs/declarations-1.html
+++ b/docs/declarations-1.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/declarations-2.html b/docs/declarations-2.html
index 059ac2f..098dfaf 100644
--- a/docs/declarations-2.html
+++ b/docs/declarations-2.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/declarations.html b/docs/declarations.html
index d047a16..e384626 100644
--- a/docs/declarations.html
+++ b/docs/declarations.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/index.html b/docs/index.html
index 11c6c78..6f61617 100644
--- a/docs/index.html
+++ b/docs/index.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/references.html b/docs/references.html
index dd65fac..3fe6fb3 100644
--- a/docs/references.html
+++ b/docs/references.html
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@
1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts
1.4.2 A/B compartments
1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs)
-
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales
+
1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales
1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions
1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins
1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure
1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization
diff --git a/docs/search_index.json b/docs/search_index.json
index 843adea..1c7cb8b 100644
--- a/docs/search_index.json
+++ b/docs/search_index.json
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
["1-1-regulation-of-expression.html", "1.1 Regulation of gene expression", " 1.1 Regulation of gene expression Each cell in our body originate from the same fertilized stem cell and has therefore virtually the same genome. However, different cell types have distinct morphologies and fulfill diverse functions. This diversity is achieved by expressing only a subset of genes to a specific extent for any cell type, developmental state, and environmental condition. Gene expression is therefore complex and controlled on many molecular levels (Lelli et al. 2012). The initial sequencing of the human genome reviled a tremendous resource of information encoded in the DNA sequence (Lander et al. 2001). However, we are still far from completely understanding the sequence information itself (Lander 2011). While functional knowledge of individual genes and its activity, evolution, and associations to diseases accumulates over the last decades, the non-coding parts of the genome are only recently annotated in massive collaborative efforts (Dunham et al. 2012; Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium et al. 2015; Andersson et al. 2014). These projects provide various functional data along the genome and together with many independent studies lead to an increased understanding of the regulatory potential of non-coding regions and its dynamic activity across conditions. It becomes clear that gene regulation occurs on many levels. The genomic sequence itself encodes cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) to which transcription factors (TFs) bind by recognizing specific DNA sequence motifs. TFs often form complexes with other proteins and DNA. However, TF binding and CRM assembly at promoter regions of genes or distal enhancer elements require often specific epigenetic states of chromatin. Epigenetic modifications of DNA, such as methylation, influence the ability of TF to bind DNA. Also, the chromatin structure and accessibility itself determines if a gene can be transcribed. So-called pioneering factors can bind closed chromatin that is wrapped around nucleosomes and remodel it to make it accessible for other TFs that require open chromatin and specific environments of post-translational histone modifications to bind cis-regulatory regions and activate target gene expression. Another layer in gene regulation is the three-dimensional folding structure of chromatin in the nucleus, as explained in more detail below. However, most of the cell-type specific gene regulation that accounts for cell differentiation in development and morphological diversification in evolution are driven by activation changes of non-coding regulatory regions, described as enhancers (Long et al. 2016). "],
["1-2-distal-regulation-by-enhancers.html", "1.2 Distal regulation by enhancers", " 1.2 Distal regulation by enhancers Transcription factors regulate transcription of genes by binding to genomic DNA. However, these regulatory binding events do not occur only at proximal promoters of genes. In contrast, many transcription factors regulate genes by binding to distal regulatory elements, such as enhancers (Spitz and Furlong 2012). Physical interactions between enhancers their target gene promoter is facilitated by chromatin looping and propagated by proteins such as the mediator complex (Andrey and Mundlos 2017). Figure 1.1: Enhancer-promoter interactions by chromatin looping. Eukaryotic genes are regulated by binding of transcription factors (TF) to DNA. Transcription factor binding events occur at proximal promoters of genes and distal regulatory elements, such as enhancers (left). Chromatin looping facilitates physical interactions of enhancers with promoters to enable distal-regulation of transcription. Figure adapted from (Pombo and Dillon 2015). Enhancers were originally defined as genomic regions that enhance the expression of a reporter gene when placed experimentally in front of a minimal promoter. (Banerji et al. 1981; Shlyueva et al. 2014). Enhancer activity can also be detected genome-wide by specific genomic experimental approaches. Thereby, patterns of open chromatin are identified using DNase-seq (Song and Crawford 2010) or ATAC-seq (Buenrostro et al. 2013). Active enhancers show short bidirectional transcription, which can be identified using CAGE (Andersson et al. 2014). Enhancer associate with specific patterns of posttranslational histone modifications, such as H3K27ac and H3K4me1. These epigenetic marks, as well as TF binding events, can be detected genome-wide by chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with sequencing (ChIP-seq) experiments (Creyghton et al. 2010). Single enhancers often regulate multiple genes. Similarly, individual genes can be regulated by multiple enhancers. Thereby, additive effects of multiple enhancers often archive complex regulation of developmental genes. For example, the \\(\\alpha\\)-globin gene locus is controlled by multiple enhancers, whereby each act independently and in an additive fashion without evidence of synergistic effects (Hay et al. 2016). Also, the Indian hedgehog (Ihh) locus is regulated by multiple enhancers with individual combinations of tissue specificities that function in an additive manner (Will et al. 2017). Variation of the copy number of enhancers by experimental perturbations correlates with expression strength. For example, a significant reduction of the expression of the oncogene PIMI could not be achieved by perturbing a single enhancer, but only by combinatorial repression of several weak enhancers (Xie et al. 2017). While large-scale efforts provide genome-wide maps of enhancers and their activity in different human tissues (Andersson et al. 2014), it is challenging to interpret the outcome of enhancer activity to gene expression. Enhancers can be located several hundred kb apart from the promoter of regulated genes. Genome-wide studies suggest that the majority of enhancers do not regulate the next gene (Sanyal et al. 2012). Therefore, it is critical to understand long-range genome folding to illuminate the re-wiring between enhancers and regulated genes. "],
["1-3-methods-to-probe-the-3d-chromatin-architecture.html", "1.3 Methods to probe the 3D chromatin architecture", " 1.3 Methods to probe the 3D chromatin architecture 1.3.1 Microscopy-based techniques to visualize the genome in 3D Historically, the organization of chromosomes and specific loci within the nucleus have mostly been studied using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments. FISH is limited to visualize a few pre-defined loci in a few hundred cells at once and is limited in spatial resolution. Novel super-resolution microscopy approaches such as STORM and PALM have enabled direct visualization of the fine-scale structures of the genome at an unprecedented resolution (Bonev and Cavalli 2016). Labeling of specific chromatin proteins, histone marks, or genomic loci allow to analyze the dynamics of chromosomes at high resolution in living cells. However, despite spectacular technical progress, microscopy-based approaches are limited to a small number of genetic loci and do not allow a comprehensive analysis of the nuclear architecture of the complete genome. Furthermore, the specific folding patterns observed in microscopy cannot be mapped to genomic coordinates. This substantially limits the computational integration with other genomic data. However, a combination of imaging-based techniques with proximity-ligation experiments together with integrative computational models might enable to study the real-time dynamics of chromatin organization with high resolution on the single cell level (Stevens et al. 2017; Flyamer et al. 2017). 1.3.2 Proximity-ligation based method to quantify chromatin interactions The frequency of interactions between different loci in the genome can be measured experimentally by proximity ligation techniques (Sati and Cavalli 2017; Schmitt et al. 2016). These protocols are variations of the chromosome conformation capture (3C) experiment (Dekker et al. 2002). 3C works by the ability to cross-link two genomic loci that are in close physical proximity in the nuclear space (Fig. 1.2A). This is achieved by treating cells with formaldehyde leading to covalent bonds between individual proteins and DNA with proteins (Hoffman et al. 2015). The cross-linked chromatin is then digested by restriction enzymes to fragment the genomic DNA. Then, re-ligation of fragmented DNA result in hybrid DNA molecules of restriction fragments that were in close physical proximity during cross-linking but originate from different regions in the linear genome sequence (Dekker et al. 2013; Andrey and Mundlos 2017). Figure 1.2: Proximity ligation technologies to measure chromatin interactions. (A) By treating cells with formaldehyde chromatin is crosslinked. After fragmentation with restriction enzymes, DNA from two loci in close physical proximity in the nucleus is ligated to a hybrid DNA molecule that is then made from DNA that originated from two regions distal in the linear genome (indicated in red and blue). (B) Different variants of the 3C experiments differ in their approaches to measure the ligation products or subsets of it, in order to quantify chromatin interactions. Figure adapted from (Dekker et al. 2013). There exist several 3C-based methods which differ by the way the ligation product, which represents and chromatin interaction, is measured and quantified (Fig. 1.2B). The standard 3C protocol allows quantifying hybrid DNA-product by quantitative PCR using specific primers to amplify the product junction (Dekker et al. 2002). In Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) experiments, a circular PCR is used to amplify all hybrid DNA products that are ligated with the desired restriction fragment, e.g., a specific viewpoint of interest. These products are then sequenced to generate an interaction profile measuring all interacting regions with this viewpoint (Simonis et al. 2006; Noordermeer et al. 2011). Another variant of 3C, Carbon copy chromosome conformation capture (5C), combines 3C with hybrid capture approaches to identify up to millions of interactions in parallel between two large sets of predefined loci, for example between a set of promoters and a set of distal regulatory elements (Dostie et al. 2006; Sanyal et al. 2012). Other methods combine chromatin immunoprecipitation to enrich for chromatin interactions between loci bound by specific proteins of interest or marked by post-translational histone modifications. One of these methods is chromatin interaction analysis by paired-end tag sequencing (ChIA-PET), which allows for genome-wide analysis of long-range interactions between sites bound by a protein of interest (Fullwood et al. 2009). Therefore, ChIA-PET data represent a selected subset of all interactions but is an efficient alternative to measure interactions at high resolution (Tang et al. 2015). The most unbiased method to quantify all pair-wise interactions genome-wide is Hi-C (Lieberman-Aiden et al. 2009). After the initial restriction enzyme step of 3C, in Hi-C, the ends are filled with a biotin-marked nucleotide and subsequently re-ligated. A streptavidin pull-down step enriches the chimeric products, which are then sequenced using paired-end sequencing technology. Each read from the resulting read-pairs is then aligned independently to the reference genome to identify the originating position of the sequenced restriction fragment. Each read pair represents a pairwise physical interaction of the corresponding regions. Interaction frequencies are usually analyzed by binning the genome into equal-sized regions of several kb depending on sequencing depth. While the first Hi-C study produced genome-wide interactions at a 1Mb resolution (Lieberman-Aiden et al. 2009), more recent studies could analyze folding patterns at 40kb (Dixon et al. 2012) and later up to 1kb resolution (Rao et al. 2014). These methods provided fascinating insights into higher-order genome organization. "],
-["1-4-hierarchy-of-chromatin-3d-structure.html", "1.4 Hierarchy of chromatin 3D structure", " 1.4 Hierarchy of chromatin 3D structure The three-dimensional organization of genome folding was studied extensively in recent years and is reviewed comprehensively (Pombo and Dillon 2015; Sexton and Cavalli 2015; Bouwman and Laat 2015; Dekker and Mirny 2016; Dixon et al. 2016; Schmitt et al. 2016; Bonev and Cavalli 2016; Hnisz et al. 2016a; Merkenschlager and Nora 2016; Long et al. 2016; Rowley and Corces 2016; Ruiz-Velasco and Zaugg 2017; Andrey and Mundlos 2017). The genome is thought to be hierarchically organized on different genomic-length scales (Fig. 1.3). Whole chromosomes occupy distinct territories in the nucleus. Thereby, chromatin clusters in two types of compartments on the Mb scale. On the sub-Mb scale, pair-wise interactions are enriched in discrete domains and sub-domains. These domains are made up of individual looping interactions and restrict regulatory contacts between enhancers and gene promoters. These hierarchical levels are described below in more detail. Figure 1.3: Hierarchical organization of three-dimensional chromatin architecture. The left side shows a high-resolution Hi-C interaction map as a heat-map. The color intensity represents the interaction frequencies of orthogonally associated loci. The right side shows models of the individual genome structures. (A) Interactions occur mostly between loci on the same chromosome, indicating chromosome territories. (B) Alternating patterns of interaction clusters show the association of chromatin into A/B compartments. (C) TADs appear as triangles with enrichment for intra-TAD interactions. Borders of TADs insulate interactions between neighboring domains. (D) Peaks in the Hi-C heat-map indicate pair-wise chromatin looping interactions of the associated loci. Several types of loops are shown on the right side. Figure adapted from (Bonev and Cavalli 2016). 1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts The eukaryotic genome is highly organized in the interphase nucleus. Chromosomes occupy distinct spatial regions, called chromosome territories, and intermingle less than one would expect by chance (Fig. 1.3A) (Cremer and Cremer 2001). This was first observed using imaging-based approaches and is also reflected in Hi-C interaction maps, where inter-chromosomal contacts occur an order of magnitudes less frequent than intra-chromosomal contacts (Lieberman-Aiden et al. 2009). However, despite this spatial segregation of chromosomes, an intermingling of chromosome occurs and is associated with chromosomal translocations (Branco and Pombo 2006; Roukos et al. 2013; Roukos and Misteli 2014). There are also specific gene regulatory interactions between different chromosomes (Laat and Grosveld 2007), for example, olfactory receptor genes cluster densely in the nucleus of olfactory neurons to facilitate mono-allelic expression of a single receptor gene per cell (Monahan and Lomvardas 2015). Together, there exists only a few, but specific inter-chromosomal contacts and the genome is non-randomly organized in the interphase nucleus by chromosomes occupying distinct spatial territories. 1.4.2 A/B compartments The ability to measure genome-wide chromatin contacts using Hi-C revealed that individual regions on chromosomes segregate by preferential interactions into two major clusters, referred to as A/B-compartments (Fig. 1.3B) (Lieberman-Aiden et al. 2009). Interestingly, regions in A-compartments are associated with active histone modifications and active transcription, whereas B-compartment is associated with heterochromatin, lamina association, and repressed genes (Bonev and Cavalli 2016). More recently, higher resolution Hi-C maps further subdivided A/B compartments into six sub-compartments with preferential interactions and associations with distinct chromatin features (Rao et al. 2014). 1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs) Compartments could be identified by clustering of long-range interactions in Hi-C maps with bin resolution of 1 Mb. In 2012, higher resolution Hi-C maps of up to 40 kb lead to the identification of genomic regions with preferential interactions within them (Fig. 1.3C). These genomic regions were termed topologically associating domains (TADs) (Dixon et al. 2012; Nora et al. 2012; Sexton et al. 2012). Other authors describe similar structures as physical domains, chromatin domains, or contact domains. TADs are operationally defined as genomic regions with frequent interactions of loci within the domain and decreased interactions across domain boundaries. Quantitatively, Hi-C contact frequencies between loci in the same TAD are approximately two to three times those of genomic regions outside of the TAD (Merkenschlager and Nora 2016). TADs can be identified from Hi-C interaction maps computationally by different algorithms (Ay and Noble 2015). The directionality index (DI) is a score for each bin in the Hi-C matrix that quantifies the number of upstream versus downstream interactions of this bin. Using hidden Markov models, TAD boundaries where then identified in regions where DI changes drastically (Dixon et al. 2012). Other algorithms compute an insulation score as the extent to which interactions cross potential TAD boundaries (Crane et al. 2015). Later, the Arrowhead algorithm was introduced to find “contact domains” as smaller nested structures along the diagonal of high-resolution Hi-C matrices (Rao et al. 2014). Furthermore, when analyzing Hi-C interactions at different length scales, hierarchies of TADs and sub-TADs could be identified that overlap each other (Filippova et al. 2014; Fraser et al. 2015). The different algorithms and parameters used in each study is only one source of variation in reliably identifying TADs. Othe sources of variations are (i) the resolution of Hi-C maps, which is mainly defined by sequencing depths, (ii) the individual steps in Hi-C protocols, such as the restriction enzyme used, (Rao et al. 2014), and (iii) different normalization strategies for raw Hi-C contact frequencies (Dali and Blanchette 2016; Forcato et al. 2017). Therefore, the number and size of TADs vary between different studies, making it difficult to compare TADs in different conditions and species across studies. The first studies on TADs identified around 3,000 TADs with a median size of ~800 kb in human and mouse genomes (Dixon et al. 2012) and around 1,200 physical domains of about 100 kb in Drosophila genomes (Sexton et al. 2012). Analysis of 1kb or 5kb resolution Hi-C matrices resulted in nested contact domains with a median size of 185 kb (range 40 kb - 3 Mb) in human and mouse cells (Rao et al. 2014). Interestingly, TADs might be equivalent to chromatin domains of 10 kb - 1 Mb in size detected by microscopy approaches (Cremer and Cremer 2010; Gibcus and Dekker 2013). Another connection of Hi-C derived interaction maps with previous microscopy observations, is that TADs in Drosophila correspond to bands of polytene chromosomes (Eagen et al. 2015). Importantly, domain structures, like TADs, were also identified using methods that do not use chromatin cross-linking and proximity-ligation. Labeling approaches using oligoprobes enabled to trace the position of TADs along individual chromosomes (Wang et al. 2016). Furthermore, domain organization in TADs was confirmed by a recently developed genome architecture mapping (GAM) approach, which relies on DNA sequencing from a collection of thin nuclear sections (Beagrie et al. 2017). The spatial positioning of TADs correlates with many genomic features measured along the linear genome (Merkenschlager and Nora 2016). TAD boundaries are enriched for binding of insulator proteins, such as CTCF in mammals and CP190 in Drosophila (Dixon et al. 2012; Sexton et al. 2012). Furthermore, TAD boundaries are associated with active chromatin, such as H3K4me3 and H3K27me3, DNase I hypersensitivity, active transcription, short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs), and house-keeping genes (Dixon et al. 2012). Furthermore, TADs correspond to regions of early and late replication timing (Pope et al. 2014; Dileep et al. 2015) and lamina-associated domains (LADs) (Dixon et al. 2012). Importantly, enhancer-promoter interactions seem to be mostly constrained within TADs (Shen et al. 2012; Ghavi-Helm et al. 2014; Symmons et al. 2014), and initial studies report slightly increased co-expression of genes within the same TAD (Nora et al. 2012). Altogether, there is accumulating evidence that TADs are fundamental units of chromosome organization (Dixon et al. 2016) 1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain-like structures across genomic-length scales Globally, higher-order interactions between different TADs leads to a tree-like hierarchy of TADs and meta-TADs across genomic scales up to the range of entire chromosomes (Fraser et al. 2015). Similar to A/B-compartments, these tree structures correlate with epigenetic marks and expression changes during cell differentiation (Fraser et al. 2015). However, TADs can also be divided further into smaller regions with stronger preferential interactions within them. These are often referred to as sub-TADs (Phillips-Cremins et al. 2013) and might correspond to contact domains which were later identified using high-resolution Hi-C (Rao et al. 2014). While sub-TADs display the same self-association features as TADs with decreased contact frequencies across sub-TAD boundaries, sub-TADs seems to be less stable across different cell types and tissues and are stronger related to tissue-specific gene expression (Berlivet et al. 2013; Phillips-Cremins et al. 2013). Studies of CTCF and cohesin mediated interactions using ChIA-PET identified smaller structural units within TADs (Dowen et al. 2014). Chromatin loops anchored at CTCF and cohesin binding sites span genomic regions described as insulated neighborhoods that restrict enhancer-promoter interactions (Hnisz et al. 2016a). Furthermore, perturbations of anchor regions by naturally occurring or experimentally induced mutations lead to dysregulation of enclosed genes (Dowen et al. 2014; Hnisz et al. 2016b; Ji et al. 2016). In summary, segregation of chromosomes into domain-like structures seems to follow a hierarchical organization across genomic-length scales. Accordingly, interaction clustering appears at scales of A/-B compartments or meta-TADs over TADs, contact domains, sub-TADs to individual chromatin loops. 1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions High-resolution proximity ligation techniques enabled to measure genome-wide pairwise interactions that interact significantly more frequently than background interactions (Fig. 1.3D). Chromatin loops can be broadly divided into two types (Yu and Ren 2017; Andrey and Mundlos 2017) The first type is constitutive or architectural loops. Constitutive loops are mostly invariant across cell types and demarcate TAD or sub-TAD boundaries (Dowen et al. 2014; Ji et al. 2016; Phillips-Cremins et al. 2013). Often, they are formed by CTCF and cohesin complexes (Rao et al. 2014). High-resolution Hi-C data showed that around 80% of borders of contact domains interact each other as loop anchors (Rao et al. 2014). This indicating that TADs form through loops between their borders and eventually several further nested loops within them. An intrinsic feature of vertebrate genomes is a comparatively long distance between regulatory regions, such as enhancers, and their regulated genes. For their ability to function as transcriptional regulators, enhancers need to come into close spatial proximity with their target promoter. These regulatory interactions are facilitated by the second type of chromatin loops, facultative loops. These loops are more cell type-specific and represent enhancer-promoter interactions. For example, the enhancers of the \\(\\beta\\)-globin gene interact strongly with its target gene via long-range chromatin contacts in erythroid cells where the \\(\\beta\\)-globin gene is active but shows little or no interactions in cells from different lineages (Palstra et al. 2003). Notably, such regulatory interactions of facultative loops appear mostly within regions spanned by consecutive loops or TADs (Hnisz et al. 2016a). 1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins An important question in current research efforts is to understand how TADs and chromatin loops are established on a molecular level. These mechanisms might differ between species. Several, so-called, architectural proteins are enriched at TAD boundaries in flies and allow dynamic regulation of these boundaries (Van Bortle et al. 2014; Gómez-Díaz and Corces 2014). In vertebrates, only some of these proteins are conserved, indicating a partially different set of factors with such functions (Phillips-Cremins et al. 2013; Bonev and Cavalli 2016). Profiling 76 TFs for binding signals at strong chromatin loop anchors identified CTCF, subunits of the cohesin complex, ying yang 1 (YY1) and zinc finger protein 143 (ZNF143) as highly enriched (Rao et al. 2014). Furthermore, the mediator complex has a well-characterized role in bridging enhancer and promoters of long-range distances and assemble the pre-initiation complex for transcriptional elongation (Allen and Taatjes 2015). Mediator depletion resulted in diminished looping interaction strength (Bonev and Cavalli 2016). Cohesin is a ring-shaped protein and has several functions including sister chromatid cohesion and DNA repair and interacts with mediator complex and CTCF in the context of chromatin architecture (Bonev and Cavalli 2016; Merkenschlager and Nora 2016). Initial studies analzed chromatin organization in cohesin deficient cells. In two studies depletion of cohesin reduced interactions within TADs but did not alter TAD structures completely (Seitan et al. 2013; Zuin et al. 2014). One study report a significant increase in interactions between different TADs after cohesin depletion (Sofueva et al. 2013). Conditional deletion of cohesin in non-cycling thymocytes suggested a role of cohesin in mediating regulatory interactions between enhancers within TADs (Ing-Simmons et al. 2015). The best studied architectural protein is probably CTCF (Ong and Corces 2014). CTCF is conserved in most bilaterians, expressed in all tissues, and essential for embryonic development. By its ability to restrict promoter-enhancer interaction in reporter plasmids, CTCF was characterized as insulator protein. CTCF has 11 zinc finger binding domains which recognize a specific DNA sequence motif, to which CTCF binds with high affinity (Kim et al. 2007; Nagy et al. 2016). CTCF binding sites are enriched at TAD boundaries in Drosophila and mammals. However, only around 15% of CTCF binding sites are located at TAD boundaries, suggesting that CTCF binding not be sufficient for TAD formation (Bonev and Cavalli 2016). About 30% to 60% of CTCF binding sites are cell-type specific, and many variable sites show an association of DNA methylation with CTCF binding. CTCF binding sites that depend on methylation are located mostly within TADs. Interestingly, CTCF ChIP-seq data across individuals show a higher variability of CTCF binding within TADs and lower variation at TAD boundaries (Ruiz-Velasco and Zaugg 2017). Also, evolutionary conservation of CTCF binding across species is stronger at TAD boundaries (Vietri Rudan et al. 2015). Depletion of CTCF had a similar effect than cohesin degradation, resulting in increased inter-domains interactions (Seitan et al. 2013; Zuin et al. 2014). These data suggest a crucial role of cohesin and CTCF in promoter-enhancer interactions and TAD formation (Pombo and Dillon 2015; Merkenschlager and Nora 2016). Interestingly, CTCF motifs appear mostly in convergent orientation at chromatin loop anchors (Rao et al. 2014; Tang et al. 2015; Vietri Rudan et al. 2015). Furthermore, experimental inversion of the motif results in changes of loop formation and, at least in some cases, altered gene expression (Guo et al. 2015; Wit et al. 2015; Sanborn et al. 2015). Polymer simulation studies together with perturbation experiments led to a model of TAD and loop formation by loop extrusion. According to this model, loop-extruding factors, such as cohesin, form progressively larger loops but stall at CTCF binding sites in convergent orientation (Sanborn et al. 2015; Fudenberg et al. 2016). Interestingly, this model explains many features of chromatin interaction data, such as the directionality of CTCF motif and nested hierarchy of TADs and TAD-like structures. In summary, genome-wide interaction data suggest a hierarchical organization of chromosome architecture. First, dynamic nucleosome contacts form clutches and fibers. These engage in long-range chromatin loops, some of which are stabilized by architectural proteins, such as CTCF and cohesin at convergently oriented motif sites, and lead to the formation of TADs. TADs form clusters by their epigenomic type into A/B compartments, and coalescence of compartments in the same chromosome forms chromosome territories (Bonev and Cavalli 2016). "],
-["1-5-dynamics-of-chromatin-structure.html", "1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure", " 1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure Proximity ligation experiments, like Hi-C, measure contact frequencies as average over millions of cells in the sample. Therefore, identified contacts might be present only in a subset of cells. Furthermore, specific contacts could be very dynamic over short time-scales in individual cells. While recent methodological advances allow studying of variation across individual cells (discussed in section 6.6.4), initial studies focused on the differences of genome folding across cell cycle and cell differentiation. 1.5.1 Dynamics across cell cycle It is important to keep in mind how chromosome folding changes during cell division. Spatial organization is generally studied in non-synchronous cells, of which interphase cells make up the biggest proportion (Bouwman and Laat 2015). In interphase, chromosomes are decondensed and hierarchically organized into territories, compartments, and TADs as described above. To prepare for cell division chromosomes untangle and condense, while transcription ceases almost entirely. Mitotic chromosomes do not show preferential organization, such as compartments or TADs (Naumova et al. 2013). Enhancer-promoter looping might be absent as well (Dekker 2014). After cell division, chromosomes decondense and fold into the interphase hierarchy. While individual genes are relatively mobile during the early G1 phase, they become quickly constrained to a small nuclear sub-volume, after which genome folding is relatively stable for the rest of the interphase (Chubb et al. 2002; Walter et al. 2003). These dynamics during cell-cycle raise the question of how the pattern of 3D organization is re-established with each cell division. 1.5.2 Dynamics across cell types and differntiation The primary domain architecture of chromatin is mostly preserved in different cell types and even across species (Dixon et al. 2012; Rao et al. 2014). However, chromatin dynamics specify distinct gene expression programs and biological functions (Bonev and Cavalli 2016). One example of dynamic chromatin organization is dosage compensation, in which the X chromosome is transcriptionally inactivated in human female cells. Whereas typical TAD structures were observed on the active X chromosome, only two huge domains were identified on the inactive X chromosome in Drosophila and human (Deng et al. 2015; Rao et al. 2014). Other examples include differences in terminally differentiated post-mitotic cells. For example, rod photoreceptor cells in nocturnal mammals have an unusual, inverted nuclear architecture, in which heterochromatin is enriched in the center of the nucleus and is absent from the periphery (Solovei et al. 2013; Falk et al. 2018). Further biological processes related to cell cycle exit strongly affect three-dimensional chromatin organization. These are quiescence in yeast, where intrachromosomal contacts increase (Rutledge et al. 2015), and senescence, where heterochromatin relocalizes from the nuclear periphery to the interior (Chandra et al. 2015). However, A/B compartments and TADs seems to be mostly unaffected in these processes (Criscione et al. 2016). Subtler effects of changes in chromatin reorganization are observed during biological processes such as cell differentiation and signaling (Bonev and Cavalli 2016). During the transition of embryonal stem cells (ESC) from ground-state of pluripotency to a primed state for differentiation, a gradual and reversible establishment of long-range contacts was observed between bivalent gene promoters (Joshi et al. 2015). These changes depended on Polycomb repressive complex 2, underscoring its role in establishing 3D genome organization in early development, as was previously shown for Drosophila (Bantignies et al. 2011). To address the question of how nuclear architecture change during lineage specification, a recent Hi-C study produced Hi-C interaction maps in ESCs and four ESC-derived lineages representing early developmental stages (Dixon et al. 2015). Interestingly, TADs are mostly unchanged during lineage specification, but intra-TAD interactions in some domains were strongly altered, and these changes correlate with active chromatin state (Dixon et al. 2015). Furthermore, often entire TADs relocate from one compartment to another, which was also associated with transcriptional changes of genes in these TADs. Also in B cell differentiation, several regions change compartment identity and relocate from the nuclear periphery to the interior (Lin et al. 2012). The dynamics of chromatin architecture were also studied in response to stimuli, such as hormone signaling by progestin or estradiol. Despite substantial changes in the transcriptional activity, only small differences were observed in the domain organization of chromatin (Le Dily et al. 2014). However, often the entire TAD responded as a unit by changing histone modifications and switching between A and B compartment. This suggests that transcription status is coordinated within TADs. Overall, TADs seems to be mostly cell-type invariant, whereby local regulatory interactions within TADs and global differences in compartment type change between cell types and correlate with differential gene expression. "],
+["1-4-hierarchy-of-chromatin-3d-structure.html", "1.4 Hierarchy of chromatin 3D structure", " 1.4 Hierarchy of chromatin 3D structure The three-dimensional organization of genome folding was studied extensively in recent years and is reviewed comprehensively (Pombo and Dillon 2015; Sexton and Cavalli 2015; Bouwman and Laat 2015; Dekker and Mirny 2016; Dixon et al. 2016; Schmitt et al. 2016; Bonev and Cavalli 2016; Hnisz et al. 2016a; Merkenschlager and Nora 2016; Long et al. 2016; Rowley and Corces 2016; Ruiz-Velasco and Zaugg 2017; Andrey and Mundlos 2017). The genome is thought to be hierarchically organized on different genomic-length scales (Fig. 1.3). Whole chromosomes occupy distinct territories in the nucleus. Thereby, chromatin clusters in two types of compartments on the Mb scale. On the sub-Mb scale, pair-wise interactions are enriched in discrete domains and sub-domains. These domains are made up of individual looping interactions and restrict regulatory contacts between enhancers and gene promoters. These hierarchical levels are described below in more detail. Figure 1.3: Hierarchical organization of three-dimensional chromatin architecture. The left side shows a high-resolution Hi-C interaction map as a heat-map. The color intensity represents the interaction frequencies of orthogonally associated loci. The right side shows models of the individual genome structures. (A) Interactions occur mostly between loci on the same chromosome, indicating chromosome territories. (B) Alternating patterns of interaction clusters show the association of chromatin into A/B compartments. (C) TADs appear as triangles with enrichment for intra-TAD interactions. Borders of TADs insulate interactions between neighboring domains. (D) Peaks in the Hi-C heat-map indicate pair-wise chromatin looping interactions of the associated loci. Several types of loops are shown on the right side. Figure adapted from (Bonev and Cavalli 2016). 1.4.1 Chromosomal territories and inter-chromosomal contacts The eukaryotic genome is highly organized in the interphase nucleus. Chromosomes occupy distinct spatial regions, called chromosome territories, and intermingle less than one would expect by chance (Fig. 1.3A) (Cremer and Cremer 2001). This was first observed using imaging-based approaches and is also reflected in Hi-C interaction maps, where inter-chromosomal contacts occur an order of magnitudes less frequent than intra-chromosomal contacts (Lieberman-Aiden et al. 2009). However, despite this spatial segregation of chromosomes, an intermingling of chromosome occurs and is associated with chromosomal translocations (Branco and Pombo 2006; Roukos et al. 2013; Roukos and Misteli 2014). There are also specific gene regulatory interactions between different chromosomes (Laat and Grosveld 2007), for example, olfactory receptor genes cluster densely in the nucleus of olfactory neurons to facilitate mono-allelic expression of a single receptor gene per cell (Monahan and Lomvardas 2015). Together, there exists only a few, but specific inter-chromosomal contacts and the genome is non-randomly organized in the interphase nucleus by chromosomes occupying distinct spatial territories. 1.4.2 A/B compartments The ability to measure genome-wide chromatin contacts using Hi-C revealed that individual regions on chromosomes segregate by preferential interactions into two major clusters, referred to as A/B-compartments (Fig. 1.3B) (Lieberman-Aiden et al. 2009). Interestingly, regions in A-compartments are associated with active histone modifications and active transcription, whereas B-compartment is associated with heterochromatin, lamina association, and repressed genes (Bonev and Cavalli 2016). More recently, higher resolution Hi-C maps further subdivided A/B compartments into six sub-compartments with preferential interactions and associations with distinct chromatin features (Rao et al. 2014). 1.4.3 Topologically associating domains (TADs) Compartments could be identified by clustering of long-range interactions in Hi-C maps with bin resolution of 1 Mb. In 2012, higher resolution Hi-C maps of up to 40 kb lead to the identification of genomic regions with preferential interactions within them (Fig. 1.3C). These genomic regions were termed topologically associating domains (TADs) (Dixon et al. 2012; Nora et al. 2012; Sexton et al. 2012). Other authors describe similar structures as physical domains, chromatin domains, or contact domains. TADs are operationally defined as genomic regions with frequent interactions of loci within the domain and decreased interactions across domain boundaries. Quantitatively, Hi-C contact frequencies between loci in the same TAD are approximately two to three times those of genomic regions outside of the TAD (Merkenschlager and Nora 2016). TADs can be identified from Hi-C interaction maps computationally by different algorithms (Ay and Noble 2015). The directionality index (DI) is a score for each bin in the Hi-C matrix that quantifies the number of upstream versus downstream interactions of this bin. Using hidden Markov models, TAD boundaries where then identified in regions where DI changes drastically (Dixon et al. 2012). Other algorithms compute an insulation score as the extent to which interactions cross potential TAD boundaries (Crane et al. 2015). Later, the Arrowhead algorithm was introduced to find “contact domains” as smaller nested structures along the diagonal of high-resolution Hi-C matrices (Rao et al. 2014). Furthermore, when analyzing Hi-C interactions at different length scales, hierarchies of TADs and sub-TADs could be identified that overlap each other (Filippova et al. 2014; Fraser et al. 2015). The different algorithms and parameters used in each study is only one source of variation in reliably identifying TADs. Othe sources of variations are (i) the resolution of Hi-C maps, which is mainly defined by sequencing depths, (ii) the individual steps in Hi-C protocols, such as the restriction enzyme used, (Rao et al. 2014), and (iii) different normalization strategies for raw Hi-C contact frequencies (Dali and Blanchette 2016; Forcato et al. 2017). Therefore, the number and size of TADs vary between different studies, making it difficult to compare TADs in different conditions and species across studies. The first studies on TADs identified around 3,000 TADs with a median size of ~800 kb in human and mouse genomes (Dixon et al. 2012) and around 1,200 physical domains of about 100 kb in Drosophila genomes (Sexton et al. 2012). Analysis of 1kb or 5kb resolution Hi-C matrices resulted in nested contact domains with a median size of 185 kb (range 40 kb - 3 Mb) in human and mouse cells (Rao et al. 2014). Interestingly, TADs might be equivalent to chromatin domains of 10 kb - 1 Mb in size detected by microscopy approaches (Cremer and Cremer 2010; Gibcus and Dekker 2013). Another connection of Hi-C derived interaction maps with previous microscopy observations, is that TADs in Drosophila correspond to bands of polytene chromosomes (Eagen et al. 2015). Importantly, domain structures, like TADs, were also identified using methods that do not use chromatin cross-linking and proximity-ligation. Labeling approaches using oligoprobes enabled to trace the position of TADs along individual chromosomes (Wang et al. 2016). Furthermore, domain organization in TADs was confirmed by a recently developed genome architecture mapping (GAM) approach, which relies on DNA sequencing from a collection of thin nuclear sections (Beagrie et al. 2017). The spatial positioning of TADs correlates with many genomic features measured along the linear genome (Merkenschlager and Nora 2016). TAD boundaries are enriched for binding of insulator proteins, such as CTCF in mammals and CP190 in Drosophila (Dixon et al. 2012; Sexton et al. 2012). Furthermore, TAD boundaries are associated with active chromatin, such as H3K4me3 and H3K27me3, DNase I hypersensitivity, active transcription, short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs), and house-keeping genes (Dixon et al. 2012). Furthermore, TADs correspond to regions of early and late replication timing (Pope et al. 2014; Dileep et al. 2015) and lamina-associated domains (LADs) (Dixon et al. 2012). Importantly, enhancer-promoter interactions seem to be mostly constrained within TADs (Shen et al. 2012; Ghavi-Helm et al. 2014; Symmons et al. 2014), and initial studies report slightly increased co-expression of genes within the same TAD (Nora et al. 2012). Altogether, there is accumulating evidence that TADs are fundamental units of chromosome organization (Dixon et al. 2016) 1.4.4 Hierarchy of domain structures across genomic length scales Globally, higher-order interactions between different TADs leads to a tree-like hierarchy of TADs and meta-TADs across genomic scales up to the range of entire chromosomes (Fraser et al. 2015). Similar to A/B-compartments, these tree structures correlate with epigenetic marks and expression changes during cell differentiation (Fraser et al. 2015). However, TADs can also be divided further into smaller regions with stronger preferential interactions within them. These are often referred to as sub-TADs (Phillips-Cremins et al. 2013) and might correspond to contact domains which were later identified using high-resolution Hi-C (Rao et al. 2014). While sub-TADs display the same self-association features as TADs with decreased contact frequencies across sub-TAD boundaries, sub-TADs seems to be less stable across different cell types and tissues and are stronger related to tissue-specific gene expression (Berlivet et al. 2013; Phillips-Cremins et al. 2013). Studies of CTCF and cohesin mediated interactions using ChIA-PET identified smaller structural units within TADs (Dowen et al. 2014). Chromatin loops anchored at CTCF and cohesin binding sites span genomic regions described as insulated neighborhoods that restrict enhancer-promoter interactions (Hnisz et al. 2016a). Furthermore, perturbations of anchor regions by naturally occurring or experimentally induced mutations lead to dysregulation of enclosed genes (Dowen et al. 2014; Hnisz et al. 2016b; Ji et al. 2016). In summary, segregation of chromosomes into domain-like structures seems to follow a hierarchical organization across genomic-length scales. Accordingly, interaction clustering appears at scales of A/-B compartments or meta-TADs over TADs, contact domains, sub-TADs to individual chromatin loops. 1.4.5 Chromatin looping interactions High-resolution proximity ligation techniques enabled to measure genome-wide pairwise interactions that interact significantly more frequently than background interactions (Fig. 1.3D). Chromatin loops can be broadly divided into two types (Yu and Ren 2017; Andrey and Mundlos 2017) The first type is constitutive or architectural loops. Constitutive loops are mostly invariant across cell types and demarcate TAD or sub-TAD boundaries (Dowen et al. 2014; Ji et al. 2016; Phillips-Cremins et al. 2013). Often, they are formed by CTCF and cohesin complexes (Rao et al. 2014). High-resolution Hi-C data showed that around 80% of borders of contact domains interact each other as loop anchors (Rao et al. 2014). This indicating that TADs form through loops between their borders and eventually several further nested loops within them. An intrinsic feature of vertebrate genomes is a comparatively long distance between regulatory regions, such as enhancers, and their regulated genes. For their ability to function as transcriptional regulators, enhancers need to come into close spatial proximity with their target promoter. These regulatory interactions are facilitated by the second type of chromatin loops, facultative loops. These loops are more cell type-specific and represent enhancer-promoter interactions. For example, the enhancers of the \\(\\beta\\)-globin gene interact strongly with its target gene via long-range chromatin contacts in erythroid cells where the \\(\\beta\\)-globin gene is active but shows little or no interactions in cells from different lineages (Palstra et al. 2003). Notably, such regulatory interactions of facultative loops appear mostly within regions spanned by consecutive loops or TADs (Hnisz et al. 2016a). 1.4.6 TAD and loop formation by architectural proteins An important question in current research efforts is to understand how TADs and chromatin loops are established on a molecular level. These mechanisms might differ between species. Several, so-called, architectural proteins are enriched at TAD boundaries in flies and allow dynamic regulation of these boundaries (Van Bortle et al. 2014; Gómez-Díaz and Corces 2014). In vertebrates, only some of these proteins are conserved, indicating a partially different set of factors with such functions (Phillips-Cremins et al. 2013; Bonev and Cavalli 2016). Profiling 76 TFs for binding signals at strong chromatin loop anchors identified CTCF, subunits of the cohesin complex, ying yang 1 (YY1) and zinc finger protein 143 (ZNF143) as highly enriched (Rao et al. 2014). Furthermore, the mediator complex has a well-characterized role in bridging enhancer and promoters of long-range distances and assemble the pre-initiation complex for transcriptional elongation (Allen and Taatjes 2015). Mediator depletion resulted in diminished looping interaction strength (Bonev and Cavalli 2016). Cohesin is a ring-shaped protein and has several functions including sister chromatid cohesion and DNA repair and interacts with mediator complex and CTCF in the context of chromatin architecture (Bonev and Cavalli 2016; Merkenschlager and Nora 2016). Initial studies analzed chromatin organization in cohesin deficient cells. In two studies depletion of cohesin reduced interactions within TADs but did not alter TAD structures completely (Seitan et al. 2013; Zuin et al. 2014). One study report a significant increase in interactions between different TADs after cohesin depletion (Sofueva et al. 2013). Conditional deletion of cohesin in non-cycling thymocytes suggested a role of cohesin in mediating regulatory interactions between enhancers within TADs (Ing-Simmons et al. 2015). The best studied architectural protein is probably CTCF (Ong and Corces 2014). CTCF is conserved in most bilaterians, expressed in all tissues, and essential for embryonic development. By its ability to restrict promoter-enhancer interaction in reporter plasmids, CTCF was characterized as insulator protein. CTCF has 11 zinc finger binding domains which recognize a specific DNA sequence motif, to which CTCF binds with high affinity (Kim et al. 2007; Nagy et al. 2016). CTCF binding sites are enriched at TAD boundaries in Drosophila and mammals. However, only around 15% of CTCF binding sites are located at TAD boundaries, suggesting that CTCF binding not be sufficient for TAD formation (Bonev and Cavalli 2016). About 30% to 60% of CTCF binding sites are cell-type specific, and many variable sites show an association of DNA methylation with CTCF binding. CTCF binding sites that depend on methylation are located mostly within TADs. Interestingly, CTCF ChIP-seq data across individuals show a higher variability of CTCF binding within TADs and lower variation at TAD boundaries (Ruiz-Velasco and Zaugg 2017). Also, evolutionary conservation of CTCF binding across species is stronger at TAD boundaries (Vietri Rudan et al. 2015). Depletion of CTCF had a similar effect than cohesin degradation, resulting in increased inter-domains interactions (Seitan et al. 2013; Zuin et al. 2014). These data suggest a crucial role of cohesin and CTCF in promoter-enhancer interactions and TAD formation (Pombo and Dillon 2015; Merkenschlager and Nora 2016). Interestingly, CTCF motifs appear mostly in convergent orientation at chromatin loop anchors (Rao et al. 2014; Tang et al. 2015; Vietri Rudan et al. 2015). Furthermore, experimental inversion of the motif results in changes of loop formation and, at least in some cases, altered gene expression (Guo et al. 2015; Wit et al. 2015; Sanborn et al. 2015). Polymer simulation studies together with perturbation experiments led to a model of TAD and loop formation by loop extrusion. According to this model, loop-extruding factors, such as cohesin, form progressively larger loops but stall at CTCF binding sites in convergent orientation (Sanborn et al. 2015; Fudenberg et al. 2016). Interestingly, this model explains many features of chromatin interaction data, such as the directionality of CTCF motif and nested hierarchy of TADs and TAD-like structures. In summary, genome-wide interaction data suggest a hierarchical organization of chromosome architecture. First, dynamic nucleosome contacts form clutches and fibers. These engage in long-range chromatin loops, some of which are stabilized by architectural proteins, such as CTCF and cohesin at convergently oriented motif sites, and lead to the formation of TADs. TADs form clusters by their epigenomic type into A/B compartments, and coalescence of compartments in the same chromosome forms chromosome territories (Bonev and Cavalli 2016). "],
+["1-5-dynamics-of-chromatin-structure.html", "1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure", " 1.5 Dynamics of chromatin structure Proximity ligation experiments, like Hi-C, measure contact frequencies as average over millions of cells in the sample. Therefore, identified contacts might be present only in a subset of cells. Furthermore, specific contacts could be very dynamic over short time-scales in individual cells. While recent methodological advances allow studying of variation across individual cells (discussed in section 6.6.4), initial studies focused on the differences of genome folding across cell cycle and cell differentiation. 1.5.1 Dynamics across the cell cycle It is important to keep in mind how chromosome folding changes during cell division. Spatial organization is generally studied in non-synchronous cells, of which interphase cells make up the biggest proportion (Bouwman and Laat 2015). In interphase, chromosomes are decondensed and hierarchically organized into territories, compartments, and TADs as described above. To prepare for cell division chromosomes untangle and condense, while transcription ceases almost entirely. Mitotic chromosomes do not show preferential organization, such as compartments or TADs (Naumova et al. 2013). Enhancer-promoter looping might be absent as well (Dekker 2014). After cell division, chromosomes decondense and fold into the interphase hierarchy. While individual genes are relatively mobile during the early G1 phase, they become quickly constrained to a small nuclear sub-volume, after which genome folding is relatively stable for the rest of the interphase (Chubb et al. 2002; Walter et al. 2003). These dynamics during cell-cycle raise the question of how the pattern of 3D organization is re-established with each cell division. 1.5.2 Dynamics across cell types and differntiation The primary domain architecture of chromatin is mostly preserved in different cell types and even across species (Dixon et al. 2012; Rao et al. 2014). However, chromatin dynamics specify distinct gene expression programs and biological functions (Bonev and Cavalli 2016). One example of dynamic chromatin organization is dosage compensation, in which the X chromosome is transcriptionally inactivated in human female cells. Whereas typical TAD structures were observed on the active X chromosome, only two huge domains were identified on the inactive X chromosome in Drosophila and human (Deng et al. 2015; Rao et al. 2014). Other examples include differences in terminally differentiated post-mitotic cells. For example, rod photoreceptor cells in nocturnal mammals have an unusual, inverted nuclear architecture, in which heterochromatin is enriched in the center of the nucleus and is absent from the periphery (Solovei et al. 2013; Falk et al. 2018). Further biological processes related to cell cycle exit strongly affect three-dimensional chromatin organization. These are quiescence in yeast, where intrachromosomal contacts increase (Rutledge et al. 2015), and senescence, where heterochromatin relocalizes from the nuclear periphery to the interior (Chandra et al. 2015). However, A/B compartments and TADs seems to be mostly unaffected in these processes (Criscione et al. 2016). Subtler effects of changes in chromatin reorganization are observed during biological processes such as cell differentiation and signaling (Bonev and Cavalli 2016). During the transition of embryonal stem cells (ESC) from ground-state of pluripotency to a primed state for differentiation, a gradual and reversible establishment of long-range contacts was observed between bivalent gene promoters (Joshi et al. 2015). These changes depended on Polycomb repressive complex 2, underscoring its role in establishing 3D genome organization in early development, as was previously shown for Drosophila (Bantignies et al. 2011). To address the question of how nuclear architecture change during lineage specification, a recent Hi-C study produced Hi-C interaction maps in ESCs and four ESC-derived lineages representing early developmental stages (Dixon et al. 2015). Interestingly, TADs are mostly unchanged during lineage specification, but intra-TAD interactions in some domains were strongly altered, and these changes correlate with active chromatin state (Dixon et al. 2015). Furthermore, often entire TADs relocate from one compartment to another, which was also associated with transcriptional changes of genes in these TADs. Also in B cell differentiation, several regions change compartment identity and relocate from the nuclear periphery to the interior (Lin et al. 2012). The dynamics of chromatin architecture were also studied in response to stimuli, such as hormone signaling by progestin or estradiol. Despite substantial changes in the transcriptional activity, only small differences were observed in the domain organization of chromatin (Le Dily et al. 2014). However, often the entire TAD responded as a unit by changing histone modifications and switching between A and B compartment. This suggests that transcription status is coordinated within TADs. Overall, TADs seems to be mostly cell-type invariant, whereby local regulatory interactions within TADs and global differences in compartment type change between cell types and correlate with differential gene expression. "],
["1-6-evolution-of-chromatin-organization.html", "1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization", " 1.6 Evolution of chromatin organization While TADs were initially described for mammalian genomes, a similar domain organization was found in the genomes of non-mammalian species such as Drosophila (Sexton et al. 2012), zebrafish (Gómez-Marín et al. 2015) Caenorhabditis elegans (Crane et al. 2015) and yeast (Hsieh et al. 2015; Mizuguchi et al. 2014). However, in C. elegans, TADs were only observed on the X chromosome of XX hermaphrodites and not on autosomes (Crane et al. 2015). The small and compact genome with most of the cis-regulatory information within 10kb from the TSS might not need long-range domains for gene regulation (Long et al. 2016). In contrast, plants have long-range cell-type specific enhancers (Zhu et al. 2015), but TAD like structures could not be observed in Hi-C experiments in A. thaliana. Interestingly, both C.elegans and A.thaliana do not encode a CTCF homolog (Heger et al. 2012), suggesting alternative mechanisms of genome organization and segmentation in these species (Long et al. 2016). TAD-like structures are therefore not required for eukaryotic interphase chromosome folding. Nevertheless, Hi-C experiments in bacteria and yeast suggest that self-interacting domains may be an ancient feature of chromosome organization. Hi-C data in Caulobacter cells revealed so-called chromosomally interacting domains (CIDs) of 30 to 420 kb in size (Le et al. 2013). In fission yeast S. pombe, globule structures at the 40-100 kb scale were identified and depend on cohesin complex (Mizuguchi et al. 2014). Furthermore, in very short CIDs of around 2-10 kb were detected in S.cerevisiae and bounded by highly transcribed genes (Hsieh et al. 2015). In summary, TAD like structures have been detected in many organisms, including files, worms, fungi, and bacteria, but variations in size and internal structure indicate differences in their formation and biological functions (Dekker and Heard 2015). Further high-resolution experiments in more diverse species are needed to understand the evolutionary origin of genome segregation into TAD-like structures. The presence of domain-like structures in diverse species across the tree of life leads to the question if not only the genomic sequence but also its folding structure is conserved between species. Interestingly, TADs are not only mostly stable across different cell-types (Dixon et al. 2012; Rao et al. 2014) and during differentiation (Dixon et al. 2015), but also remarkably similar between homologous regions in mouse and human (Dixon et al. 2012). About half of the TAD boundaries identified in human hESC cells occur at homologous genomic positions in mouse ESCs (Dixon et al. 2012). A similar fraction of contact domains was detected at homologous genomic locations in mouse and human lymphoblastoid cells (Rao et al. 2014). Another study could trace back a single TAD boundary at the Six gene loci to the origin of deuterostomes (Gómez-Marín et al. 2015). However, these analyses focused only on the subset of syntenic regions between genomes and therefore, do not allow conclusions about disruptions or the conservation of TADs by chromosomal rearrangements between species. During evolution, the genome sequence underwent several types of mutations. While single nucleotide mutations only alter a single DNA base at a time, structural variants modify larger chromosomal regions by deletions, duplications, inversions, or translocations. Thereby deletions and duplications can alter the copy number of genes. The breakpoint of such rearrangements can also lead to disruption of genes or gene fusion. However, rearrangement breakpoints can also alter the regulatory environment of genes by disrupting regulatory regions, such as enhancers, or their interactions. Comparative genomic analysis of two species can identify evolutionary rearrangements by altered adjacencies of orthologous genes. Initial comparative Hi-C studies identified several evolutionary breakpoints at TAD boundaries and highlighted an important role of conserved CTCF binding sites in facilitating conservation of TADs (Vietri Rudan et al. 2015). However, it remains to be investigated systematically if TAD regions as a whole might be stable or disrupted by rearrangements during evolution and how this is associated with conserved or divergent transcriptional regulation between species. "],
["1-7-disruption-of-chromatin-architecture-in-disease.html", "1.7 Disruption of chromatin architecture in disease", " 1.7 Disruption of chromatin architecture in disease The insulating function of TADs, which restrict promoter-enhancer interactions (Symmons et al. 2014), suggests that alterations of TAD structures may induce ectopic interactions between regulatory elements and genes in neighboring TADs, leading to gene dysregulation (Fig. 1.4). Consistently, genetic manipulation of specific TAD boundaries can change the surrounding interaction patterns and thus affect the expression of nearby genes. After experimental deletion of a 58-kb region encompassing a TAD boundary in mouse ESC, interactions between adjacent TADs increased significantly and genes in neighboring TADs were upregulated (Nora et al. 2012). More precise deletion or inversion of CTCF binding site at loop anchors in TAD boundaries altered local chromatin architecture and nearby gene expression (Dowen et al. 2014; Guo et al. 2015; Narendra et al. 2015). The alteration of chromatin contacts upon experimental disruptions of TAD boundaries leads to the question whether disruption of TADs could also be and mechanism of disease pathology. This hypothesis was initially discussed by studying the etiology of the Liebenberg syndrome, in which an upper-limb malformation phenotype is caused by a deletion in the vicinity of the PITX1 gene (Spielmann and Mundlos 2013). PITX1 becomes thereby accessible to an enhancer with specific activity in lower-limb and was miss-expressed in a corresponding mouse model (Spielmann et al. 2012). Overlap of this deletion with later identified TAD boundaries leads to the hypothesis of a regulatory effect mechanism of boundary deletions referred to as enhancer adoption. An association of TAD disruptions with diseases was first shown by computational analysis integrating TAD structures, with tissue-specific enhancers, and large chromosomal deletions, which were associated with clinical phenotypes (Ibn-Salem et al. 2014). In this study, the Human Phenotype Ontology database (Köhler et al. 2014) was used to relate the phenotypes of 922 deletion cases from the DECIPHER database (Firth et al. 2009) to monogenic diseases associated with genes in or adjacent to the deletions. This was used to differentiate for each deletion case between two possible pathogenic effect mechanism that best explains the phenotypes observed in the patients (Fig. 1.4). Many deletions were best explained by a gene dosage mechanism and haploinsufficiency of genes located within the deletion. However, about 12 percent of cases were best explained by a TAD boundary disruption and specific combinations of tissue-specific enhancers and genes in adjacent TADs. Importantly, randomization of phenotype data showed that this enhancer adaption mechanism was significantly more frequent than expected by chance (Ibn-Salem et al. 2014). Therefore, this study shows for the first time an association of TAD disruption with genetic diseases and describes a regulatory effect mechanism of TAD disruptions that need to be further investigated and has to be considered when interpreting genetic variations in patient genomes. Figure 1.4: Models of pathomechanisms by chromosomal deletions involving TAD disruption In each panel, an exemplary deletion is shown as a red bar, a TDB is indicated with a black arrow, and genes associated with the phenotypes of the CNV patient are shown in blue, other genes in gray. Phenotypic abnormalities are represented as exemplary HPO terms (HP1, HP2, and HP3). Three tissue-specific enhancers are shown in (B) as black ovals. (A) Gene-dosage effect. A deletion leads to a reduction in the dosage of haplosensitive genes located within the CNV. The individual with the deletion has two phenotypic abnormalities (HP1, HP2) resulting from deletion of two haplosensitive genes. A Mendelian disease related to mutations in the first gene is associated with HP1, and a Mendelian disease related to mutations in the second gene is associated with HP2. (B) TAD boundary deletion and enhancer adoption. Removal of the topological domain boundary allows the tissue-specific enhancer inappropriately to activate a phenotypically relevant gene located adjacent to the deletion, a phenomenon that we refer to as enhancer adoption. In this case, the individual with the deletion has a phenotypic abnormality (HP3) that is also seen in individuals with a Mendelian disease related to a mutation in the gene adjacent to the deletion. Figure adapted from (Ibn-Salem et al. 2014). Interestingly, these initial results are largely confirmed by more recent studies investigating structural variants that disrupt TADs and lead to ectopic gene expression in genetic diseases (Lupiáñez et al. 2015; Franke et al. 2016; Redin et al. 2017) and cancers (Northcott et al. 2014; Hnisz et al. 2016b; Weischenfeldt et al. 2016). This is discussed in more detail below (Chapter 6). Together, these observations lead to the questions whether other types of structural variants, like translocations and inversions, could also disrupt TADs and regulatory interactions of genes. To analyze such a position effect, we need careful integration of diverse genomic and phenotypic data. Computational tools could predict the impact of rearrangement breakpoints on TAD disruption and potential regulatory effects on phenotypically relevant genes. Such a method would improve molecular diagnoses of many patients with variants of unknown significance. "],
["1-8-aims-of-this-thesis.html", "1.8 Aims of this thesis", " 1.8 Aims of this thesis The recent advances in genome-wide ligation proximity mapping revealed that interphase chromosomes are highly organized and structurally segregate into TADs. TADs were already shown to associate with diverse genomic functions such as histone modifications (Dixon et al. 2012; Sexton et al. 2012), replication timing (Pope et al. 2014), and gene expression correlation (Nora et al. 2012; Le Dily et al. 2014). We previously showed a significant association of TAD disruptions by large chromosomal deletions with clinical phenotypes, likely caused by an enhancer adaption mechanism (Ibn-Salem et al. 2014). However, it is still unclear how exactly the genome folds into TADs and what consequence this has for gene regulation during evolution and in genetic diseases. For example, it is not clear to which extends genes within the same TAD are expressed and regulated in a coordinated manner. Despite initial evidence of evolutionary conservation of TADs in homologous regions between human and mouse (Dixon et al. 2012; Vietri Rudan et al. 2015), there was no systematic analysis of the stability of TADs during evolution. Furthermore, it is unclear if TAD disruptions during evolution correlate with gene expression divergence between species. The accumulating evidence of the critical gene regulatory function of TADs leads to the question if TADs play an essential role in genetic diseases (Spielmann and Mundlos 2016). More specifically, TADs might be used together with other genomic annotations, such as enhancers and their interactions with regulated genes, to interpret structural variations in patient genomes. Furthermore, increasing molecular and mechanistic understanding of chromatin looping and TAD formation could be used to improve genome-wide contact maps and predict computationally long-range interactions in diverse tissues and conditions. Therefore, this thesis addresses the question, whether TADs represent only structural units of genomes or also essential functional building block, in which genes can be regulated in a coordinated manner. By computationally integrating genome-wide chromatin interaction maps with diverse genomic datasets, including sequence conservation, enhancer activity, protein binding, gene expression and clinical phenotypes, this work addresses the following questions. Is the three-dimensional folding structure of genomes associated with co-regulation of functionally related genes? How are paralog genes distributed in the linear genome and the three-dimensional genome architecture? Are paralogs co-regulated with shared enhancers and located in the same TAD in genomes of human and other species? Can we learn about the evolutionary history of genes and how they are created within regulatory environments of TADs? Are TADs functional building blocks of genomes and subjected to selective pressure during evolution? Are human TAD regions conserved during evolution or disrupted by rearrangements when compared to other vertebrate genomes? Have genes within TADs a more conserved expression profile across different tissues? Are disruptions of TADs during evolution associated with changes in gene expression profiles? Can clinical phenotypes be explained by rearrangements affecting TADs and the regulation of relevant genes? Can TADs be used to interpret gene regulatory effects of balanced chromosomal rearrangements in whole-genome sequenced patients? How can we quantify the similarity of phenotypes observed in patients and phenotypes associated with genes to prioritize candidate genes? Can we provide a computational tool to integrate functional genomic elements, chromatin interaction data, and TADs with phenotype data of patients to predict pathomechanism of structural variations? Can protein binding profiles and genomic sequence features predict chromatin looping interactions? Does the cross-linking effect in ChIP-seq experiments provide characteristic signals at interacting chromatin loop anchors? Does the genomic sequence encode features that are predictive for long-range chromatin interactions? Can we provide a computational method to predict chromatin looping interactions in specific cell-types and conditions of interest? Which transcription factors are most predictive and eventually functionally involved in chromatin looping? "],
diff --git a/docs/thesis.epub b/docs/thesis.epub
index 969824aeb6f68404534db54c5d8d47f4d7fee753..22f575b021c3b1b8999438aceafe49352e88490d 100644
GIT binary patch
delta 24917
zcmb5#Wl-F10HAT)-QBIYyA&@{+^s-ycPp^CyA~@}+;wrMSaElEmjXq~h5yaX&E4FW
zo8kAcdEZS4nXto#P&K=U*bP8YQGkZQfq+7QfIx9iMB#@5DzgDJnGUiC0mWTkvDfW!
zCiwzV7(}beTj!(s6YFp@-G@dCYqDCAx
tu@=698bV!R$-;-QGBXd9=k3)lgj?Dn-un@@n&
zkoN5~gqlm$IzwUlmj<_?DI7`OPitvbWsX!iLl8(EGeZa6eKfgx>pYpsT^n)#ruaih
z)3$o#v@kbWqf{af?dZPs7l0xEgVKT_8
zZ$QH6uQ?Al*$OoFed=3WE0`Q&x;-G`cSH9o4cw%)X^`FAksdMT396?al2(>M&pZA$CgbvU4m
zy*PgxMan0<#1EH?`#IT)^mIFxU%6;Egm6G!G8yR?$EDBgI1Ak(NyVQ>|AoK}3pLIt
zzaGb2ZHs&F#us7`t!b1kW;9wGIuiH|5&i6RjQRR7i&b*|pg!SfRQJ#G!%X32KkO5`
zKht+gV+-Buq*Lll=8s9R7tGfVKHk
z{dsIV#2Y8U3;Gf)#X2h3gAeGU+k-Uw%!t!x`Y$llhR9$K7K;DXMYnTcD&I*x{Gc9#
zvfZ(~pUX4PYqv!xX0o-OySuZ)4qy
z6XA3ss7XSH30W(mRsvZopcV=lZ^zGg+b_V2T*r%?Vgnv;gKOZM#kPoKhvom@L+Bk5
z9WV5V2jguKijCmVhX5~hybWm3|8w+z4;FNW{)xE5o1h-mCx}OI+!iWm4?T}K;{~l!
zblyH(b=Z=tc0SEfz2F&i0?2^i8rvu5~0f$vCJH?{Ez>@SN|sGJFI)y|MjuxzTq8Q
z-9IKt-*8w%rr2U7ol2BA#I!G1WR}2NjNDDr>O?A9l#O-Xaja1L`u4wGfDnKeAbmyT
z?NhVvn86%sSp%Y#U$P`?{2)9yzMG7FabJ4xe^wnAvz^n4?j6KF?&=8Yc4a
z9HmQnOC&X#st#^^x!ycDEgS2YEL=~wTCGNS^J19kptHW&1{FNRcXnaC>A&Q7DW-?nX-b&}Nx!hJE{5E_3uFDM^lsAg%2
zUR+%KVSM(bz=Kd7jlM+SZuqc+HTq|yYGInMlAfr#fjp;o3d@_swrMWM$V!oHSG{Jk
zv~NQ+t!`a5Cg{F{MOX9O`CG(hGD*6NpB}SycO&D#r$yO8B)7rLgy+VfSw)`{vuh|(
zd(wRles*{l+H45T0sRgYxgMD|6>Y&>Uz0y=pBUBf&Ghk*Wlngg|A|B{n%6-(Y;C1o
z3s&hG@X@+boXcSRbQc#8M}jHKRgp_5hrvCLmlx_JhyZzfGLklBpJTH&z|%Ca`*H-e
zrYaGzB&giY7jtTouJt*k2!v!<8KMj={rK?p8l7pY5lQCGTA6&F>ezK2;R)w%hhEbD
zOt)VZb^JFsHzm6Hb+*IIQ>evpIgd~Ehq`a2MVFsb7LRYF>u@Lrr~dTTT;?DvXxcvz
z2;@Vba{=ds2sPy2MVtYsLSOOjg=pjw7z4lE6XQxD#-sJ8SqNE4wP^uVKDuwDJ=QIf
zYSOTKocsvp84J=GeR4ekbUtQ1wEwx
z2n(DE;leZ45HGqx8)Ys!XO1xnx6Xm(9~x=x^t86<%oaAELR_d8e%Yp!hU#R;gzN_`
zu&wg?(;vHx$PdpJyhcrDoEbPMC5N9=ezpt)Rpr!t9$~|BBhc|st=_79^;W^f`^AzU
zo9|wsVQ0g4DWg3_m{x4wu%50_l~?N`5YfK0P|h-#KgTFtsi_ymi}c;#l+jqpVHVZ%
z%OAmg_)d94oIT9SsGaR{jY=EZh!Un@)V~XVr5YH>WZ@vir+D7kzkZh
zfr#`&@>we5`;k`?(l&9UgOY-NX8!`yWkM`UjuecWiun`RMVK`hj*b>{2UheO7vr{*
z=E;dLh4Ek~jqKYV731!f)o0_Lsv9oQ?JdHqM?9vpCY@xTl9u`?F3@gSjNbW)1w?x%o1OG1jxh3J`9L|jHDd|;MghKo>gOP(
zt?thsIc)Aw3JmzYB0t4(i53cowuBi@^6tbm9)+;9${x|@pPP4{;D%A7qKia3)yK5z
zBb%#33`)4QDm0^P^`k8ycJiz!|00PNFOiIxu}Cw{^HfQ5K$xkdeApBDSX;JEWGFvNb{
zuApOlndDrxU}_y1Qb)>Ib^N$Fonpa)Ftf}|;sR;k-?=iGSJ>l9LQgZcVT+(5WJun+
z&>UU>p>IK+142vX!#{?^ngvV^CRxy>ILkiy3Pg$X72}+uMxots_!i`IE-r^rpLC&m
zFFK6G-UY8g(NDWpekjYH-7Zz$J!&e3>NcUTj_28qt{J~<(!Ef82BLA*Dd1%v
zB+4Bj7S}T*Z6DVNVCZr9^F`>9aGWn_6CG1@|6&YW)EAg`238i5QY+jK$d`d|o$|Lt
zw#_6D#;~-DgU!C#ir1$kr!wY!O7k$Y$HgMpH~P0X%_{T(%<`OTWAdy<4>Lw
zClmXUI&90?H4G5P55~`8F>J$x@xxU~F!|t2hl+HZrCwkoR~yET1exV{#;aoI=_Ou+sXjhp
z)Z1`$NenHM#}(Wv93~Nqw`dYUNJ*j;d330BW)V+!=OBUb5ql#HdaxFQPW)(-(r#EF
z9seE#ABs#%J}CzNZ+`+8f|$hqNZkHRKG80rJ$C*85S#ZZVi@Ty_d
z&~0v*h4|_hu@vscQ2<~0l}sXE`HjrC4Lj_JDT=@=0kpq=N-yA!JvDAULZzqo-d(`xO1oirN>
z*rdm$;Dal#iB&T!{!~uK@l^kg<1y+XnQw10MfLIXjZ2mvQ;_;3{l~qB>!z#I<&KLBE
z1TlUXq5x%4M{~jT%qR*8WPAR$CZv1Es<^u{s`{xJ(Fay0Ziw$HJfeSf9q?4eZ_CHw
z4XpFQh=LTezx-?iK_xO776@@ia!-%2^v=Wh`vKc
z6}4NiM`&z_qAqf+-|hdpY*FGeEjGOtL>cFUk!ewN_E@|3Gd%%dFWpiNqfO20MgVtQNYGyj>
zqQ^Fi!b;}onMVP;xdWfehuu^q9mmV4c67yu;I-sDBq+E5XXBLbrES+-nTC!`V({{y
zYuV13%A}8M21?jm=iMS4J9&G1c=HOQk}RqCj6F8nyRzUy_|rnf=Zq6KHmrik2llg~
zw~s54I@++LYS9{L{eIH+XHt?*Rh(nu($&+7Q7juYAqsGj9PIe4@vUM5?F!@)NnEc5
z)0s!{^3xfF9omp_gX3WB!MWxZnjIQ?;JC-iLPsysJ%~tivL;LDL)#H07HKe}kHu6C
z&KbB|YkUXv*t-8wvvFO9mK_mxk7~5mmWJ{M@`IUpG|8r?_>mBK#R&{~V}r*ULPYst
zn8(`Pq%P%WwbnZS75fBJ7!sSVv6<|LRocp^F*hbgIhFm_8ZbHy9N(clkF!E#d5YIW
zT~u?5I;b9Rm0}rzKfpIjc3B}+Yuzp?ikU(iK5KB)WPAgKHtkteM+Vl~nR#ke+r4;fhl
zfoYUftcI{k{ptkW^9$+7n<3>#TFACo1%1jxxG8)j0b){#i)78bmZdt*;GQ739?2gr
zunV1cP-Dx|7%{7R?yJo8+y}7xefgf`q@r%ejHQ+Aj0O2FlnY$)LNayX3heT0-3<&g!7i
zIrx%svF*?&c-YiP1BCP{+?~w}+ULf+TKIrN9CfYyFaMUjxEI
zNl>5D9Mllh&x=;qpKhV6mORypDzbxrHr=UrA{km2Cp8YTr@BQqS}PE@v$l=sbfTSW
zehv5@O2TozZ=F`Y
zILIH%MarK4Q>@*y%94hadV`R5xSdywk3c)jN*`oxlEXZSlFg`4n$hTPAsf1c{$k%{9-76F-SZYNUxh!_#gF
zUo(GpY?xil;h;%jh8gtPIm#&~#I(v+zCBEO;-3{fz4B$bghS|GCw^ohWfhN_!V`hM
zsUz#m@5Hx+&n*W;adgGHZ4Y~GDeV@Cd?Zj1f*S^;yZHYj(hXFXqlA@
zAYn;-)v@QNBy*aGV3b*=cwh}Sn1Ge?S5Yj7b|g<9Gb8XBUY$v;9i|PA!1+4Hufv=9
zcX9POa>)K=bsc}RXn+dFCF5J>4y0jkKJKR
zR3viq5rg#=<^~MJ5&entVX~-94tf1^!w~p!zj?>@3}ZB0^j{|^>-rEc$4g0w+K*(A
z#nj3UCsf0WSUc){DIFJ%8`DSzL7p4f#ru+pN?|fYdac2SdgL_6Q=Al3>7N!jr7^^8
z6d@2u316sN?LL#LR=TWAlrt&2B7_%KEFI@p=v4XROmcbCT>Vnk{)wCG(`E|NKlO&w
z{qelW#5lw4)9DhXh#ib_8B10>TqSfDuun3Lg2fAV)cGmZucOFJ;I!4jWB?~oe
zteLVD!3uTWx%wUWmD$ErMqLUP$y``SFuF^duOE|>5V(w0D2v|d!0Qyiy~qn=-Fz$q53}aY5vz
zi4J*wc!WC0fzKm#mJ|(N?P$eXvO(O|htPPQo1iCX6J3wPAAUwxfsgR~rN-Z_yl2_U
z(s#N)%c@vpb}T^{PgynN&Pxa+LorUS*62>zojHJg2yHmY>hYx(B>s(e4w~IG_<`}_
zfqV5>-t}x5N6c{kq`W+9502SJ
zn>%}9r^J#!(mN{j(4I?keLPa(7Jb02hxk{mVK8u`9sC{97}OjEoi>&djHLT;p01!x
zFRfOb#Cgu3p6c>&bU#C=w{2_Lz;#nJtb+pILL={{H0lN>Pa_$~{VW^HDBe=U8zrqJ
zzO*=@d^l=YpCvC{?eR~?P?_)s)admx>UBD3blB=~%%9Fuxh|39YAqea09+AiA<^XNgCNS`0
zybi<<=Qi5acvUEKF=jL-J%Qqnw;y^)^t0eOedV>iW3)Duur{4fgMIT2+p@BBHY9O#DQ;US;AtmjllZn7{-4w{IzJLC
znWVh4s~jlZ;#2wolHoL0BwO{jwuySt^^to%N&Ms{vR_T9NN=Wx%seI~#0*z(Nlqa2
zXVmJQY%QS=Q^TrT?OG8=HPR6Fxn+p~UW<~)a00`t-4nNMlQLJ$!SZ_&f?aA4lEaG^
zyY54r_h0kECL)&dFAigBHYv=WYeLVozhIvd<#B>e{`g|8kN-uxxaV(CXcU=d!-NxMjDUDF8zE8I3d?PNNmn=1te>ung;!*_p5-1qR(}}7
zDL=B1^spw?_4iv&_FQxk7)|Fo6yP7fJ)P`o^1diP?>yW{rZ%_*`9(I9gMxB*4&&co
zR1|Rk=U-d?=fzGDft02z90-W!21b%6XpmJ3fd+J}B$FKqv`gcf+v-nPX15?_2U`5K
z7@uH&CkH7P>L6mwwT>NFzjEDdY0Y_l;%35#bYlS(`z}se@pwbRKolSCpDAZOXT`L(
zp4WL3O;KwiS52WI6l*pfD`k2{h+0HCn{o97w|vNgt1qy99%)UIw|vX@$Krkocc8Fh
z$Efuz*w?aOO!I{67BU|LDi6q|(G
z>fIkvJ)xidkMajhbvC8=wCKyd2qve
z68GDdbCrb(oqrv}9gP2{Ui*edj0I)2$PC63Ouk{H5kj19CEeL5bSNh6G^?K$1ENgj
zElB*D*S%`ummdYk8-prb9Tb@o;}8vY=@*FRz)@re#vND2)3*|CM2CO<4bG#=cg5SF
zY_$2$g9SV@H(TQhlYhstBpd31lp!pohetX|)v$iiKg
zB2!vftfCn?NT1gi+S~bru}{PzPjMrZI4|8#1|Q&X#&$)7bMl$<{4-L_V6zIV`@T@C
z>G(UuoRoc{=gMvMaz<^zqaaZavV8FCq!xqcp!cWv{hZA_@?pjbC4n?)(25wYYeVz-
zZdI=4MJqTXCN%LtWpFzvQu}+JHsOS1`)5ku44qx6HCNAwo?}v0mxJKZ8|9;d=$E4N^>u+_sV43zt{D&8rxVDlf8-XgVHepNUy=yfEE7?m*F|VaQTTN+OuU
zF;*641822EdNAt@m4%gu2W&nf%$4(b8-L=QrwoHMbf%Z65o~U%odY<
z+~3xo_$&Dj_OjAwj>2-fCSE}-sEB*}zH2Rc0#(Q>BYD4s=&mIuV`uT%z5b{?6F>(u
z5cp!?ppfl*&G!gVD1E8rn-z%XX<6?Trco1-(Qbh+X(nB#9-ypg+eI%?h#Hceqs2-1?QA<%H+0a*7IUV6pCW
z-f$j$r_)@kY*~&3t^8b>Csg%$ACH22oAetJ7$cXe{!sRg9x7>r()?Ukw6033DD{
zOotOwz!wdZ8RiP23!8SEBlUgtaho73Eh78d`D>w3+H#&uHoW?9-@odYqOV){0!I?7
z<&K_1BA^uf`Z_Oa{b49)!nZh$R!!7OK{Jn_T5k9bGV6Le!8QY
zfR=HWYC(F&JR*GOA;#+3w7ee!LnD+p@HRTN26fHw!njnkBexadvOCpxxC0f=(RD}o
z##~k`P%ET6LYkeD7v$g+OoKjIKufF9@@nE-Zm+M)_Lcc;3!WDnp_uD+G{#Wl{PTe|
z!k&YC{gdWzi`7w^yd^ZE(9{T)y4}grP3BrhE&)w16g06jvJA!cvk7{!gD(~0a1VxQ
z-ip>O9Uh?dcCX=MLU{{3iAX$ykVrVTDw93}Z?*EOAhSiilq`S3p|52uH*C%(Ce@GQ
zdF_^V*pRq|JVkFy&WOC$K1xO6-1$(+_UN2Mp1LQxp;Ug(;kj;^47U!Xkm2UIx&D`o
zz6LU%>WodnwGYj~(^hW$(Brio;EHXdS*uZkXPi)y`B<&IUW1f&jbX<#eqzv)nvz8%
z6x#d|@ziF%0fnL9qlpH^M@&@4f@ra$F-;DEmA_pDxLceA(4}2A!W8foSa^lYOHFjg
zxD^BCZQaS|b6@HBSr+nSnG?s1h3mc$;-7+YDhv#_%S6N4d;1@qgQP6~t$=l|4dS`!
z)#6P**XZ=Bn0=`<5$@x=hu1U_BKk13F6my~Rl<7%c-QaMj?Y9{rpjSmR@$#?nN;mgW7mcHOBH>6nAlvBF
zJC=!UX*{;%WgO!2EJ}HPRTt+=*i-Jiv`Fchfp;M#0P0!?kuu3F!nZR@uAjyS4$!4fza20J8=>sB8*9E63$40liLxy(#QaAmQ
zeod|+FPv~9C6)`Q-GR#}
zJ{}udn^7eWokDpsY;d=8NbUACUOtWcn&noZib^})3$5f`(E#i?;T|FU9;
zsCC3%lnC-5aw}g;T{+agOXK`bsa5c0a37r&uD=1%e=JHFBr$1|Yd^g@8U_F5GA#T{
zTHYjS3nlj(|4r8V+1brb5@@x-s?eMzG*Df^jmz?Eyz4x+hp*4MGIb&)M?-{e
z_GInDlY1RR4TvObc!{~=k-x~@;_iR_1`i5tWh)u3x?%5XJdmQbv2vXyW9mj8MF!`!
zeyw->Sz)%eqB)NvBnINb%{JML85WXK&mKg04w7mdC6o@azE~xnFm(UjFyj6@<5>_+
zWHDUN*3101X`F}a;SZ7r9?wa&xCi!=t;IzJdZSx495L(k0A5zcvljHY<&qj#C7kj_
zeMYMzLks&d66-|S=U<0Erd|V{TG%LBrntVNu$6ETkHeCAGkAeCN3y@fI$Q{Y`}DHl
z%X7zrKam~0*p#li9(2Kp%YD6|3tY>2C_VHu95%#F+`k#e!jPjXC+axAh~$}1G1_rG
zHR$MSgPHN%NONe|i&m_s38SskeKL0^@~)CDSLi-hV{RPlZ!y;6b@Orxb+lA&T{>P9
zRITy3hQ)U$N_Pbjk}1@+Jkq*6LDFLWSju$69BV~P+Kfem*@{&l9<^n(d7KxhhW4!c
zy|(!A$fV}SEFGVFh|AXsEU!fSqRVePXiIgd%nnr?>biTFskd6=Ks2SCaU)Yp2zt*&}4b{D_l7Sd6@&lV;r0Fx9~@0$$bo$>ZJ>
zuQl=B+RUZ?mGgOfY~#;vF8WGsXV6k4XB4`>WwP$tNTD(w)t7k%yowEf2XIHl}X)6g-wf
z@W{uEA37T)pgIm(r1JCKZek<;+=c1ez=Rn)y^fc9*st)qi9?aGvh4(WUj5Rv@~7L3
z;m{w5JFt;6Dd{_t`zj%@ewm6icbeHp^^{qPE(->=JwINbPoiJG-A?W)`5)6?
z+_*QWH?=$odY}I>IjEKSvZ&er`Qce@bIGfd99GuwhTC;Rfg?*d;(G6VAowDkS0@82
z*w8ioXg2yQ9IG8itGY%OEyLhTHCd4Ekwj4Orzd{nAu|x
zO3)ShNmV6Mhik%?(!#QtuIqsNS1PnNCH+0Q`^T>b9p-&$($s-R<
z8xn;p5(PHSC6NGJgvPESLL;9GutF8#0TNI@|AZ)kn{%sj`
zXMk=`&{&`sHWGJnve1+s+-26i!^6XNxKHZZ2Lg_>&f9K9V>8^_HVrTqHMMRipKs=`
z#~50)LdO#ZZ<;6-?CSqIxPe18z77GzX@&p`n%)MT2~G7`OUH;1U?(y
z47A~#4RrnsyK;O9$!Ru(?fTZ)X<_&nPfk@+uar_K~hlA&c!1UsLDD?9F)MWA0lj
zp#j&6a#@6@@?Nf*fH(?x)9>N`xNWR~j{^=0xM#INj7tF$_#7O=9Uj9C34j7X17N^0
z+^|_0z#RC)1T1kA@E}|!7!CjrKmZ^Dkias*$d>`{lYB5J08{`P03Cn{x1{y``vE{+^~uZ;}8%7
zc97|q)u}jOb$0rL@%Q}^`bQ6701N&5utxVjKuF67U;;3M329kAnV`LIAg;Le8ukqm
zB1SSj5jG7s_l;Np5-vO{j0GGO#)|&-zG7A=8-N|a0pJ8@g>rGmyiZJGa)T!^d4_l2
z7c&0v0C)j>;EX@~mPY?=zO+z@KzIcb;wkaJ&4*KK2!N?I1Ql1_S8-+)0tf>{0HOdf
zurupN5zhC?TH}uZaexFs5?pI6HGuX$;o&F+kOs(rJsf3Wo!$riHf6zno1b0_-WPm>
z1*iek
z0U7{JfEGX-paW*N)V=q7e^`m;$~6%mC&93xFkf4bLi3`u$0c237!TfDOPFU>LTm>>55CMn;L;<1!F@RV=93UQ$07wKR0g?eJU=_&J`byv{gJG&uLI3Sr
zC~O)y6gK^G{e6EtcGCgh0U3Zyu*Yszwcz^%9a%OY2k--s3&;c0k>#Vdyif8hq1W*bn1C#?Q0F_{#g(?UA_Z5pcssS~CT0kA39?$@21T+Df!9^V4sX*Y#
zV9y5dkGl5<_~tE}|D9Nm@U7vG@NIy0KnI``&;{rQ^Zl(TF#oUm%;WT{%V4A+cSL*kTQy&aoM8EGFw#zTT5MUTE0>*Y3?Hu{dPzzM$<8Uy?Wi~}YBlYl9}G++iW3z!4U0~P>_fF-~(U54z7>Lu2fPRBJ<#ugc@OM+;2^tih2SB%tbs!n&rk#p2?XIii0?sq
z5Au6Z-h=ucwD+LD2je}M@4Bn9=i9?zlY&HAKt_G9;Wv&zlY^LtnXoa4?AQxLlFn0+41}L78l0}
z34{x>J1&kJ5|-e7EEPCyx>JjJAjc1Z#cs1WUdW#?|D77F!*%lW3J?&(tdP0Rz%X_<
zV=^z~4K>J5%S6OHw}<<;>vsJRUkoz3CFy;m&1tF=E@>0fTxeAH#2De?5Ly!J1I4P<
zGrJEH%OSC%A_c8~+0fogMPBRBnejP_{Ea_9gW?5meQep5Z?fiMv%UoWsr{pDQK;eo
z!wbX@<93ssvp;=8sH#p6In|<#R44rHUQsD>BqyM*Cs)PJMV*DgQv+(&z$Tp(_(ENp
z2@IGo0*C>Eg7FcXs{y`edK{hk1?tiz@!GF}!nG}CGeUfUAY_RCQOadYea$aUqnr9Xm<9x%pGj#ZzYHMm)J#dR>J)Q>91G4z4D@>WK4}<
zPGRLVBYbBErSKh|OT%IeyV`3%ciUgt0&Qcb1wIkW(^y7us?$G&vQ!JTP30U7>p6?D
zF^0Y-%S}#6`nj4i1X0MeuR@JehnRm-*GT<95@`CmR3bFST=~u$cZYT?hShhHU(czS
zgS6&TeaNRmNt#%M4ET$#{GeuT4_Vd>_?m)EznI`z{oZwo2yRqPbS3q!qu#=ZpWA
zHBQi-cQhYKJWZt#vO)&dhL;Eb6T61LzUgWgbHNNLwc@oi_--o*~AF^6vj!T8m
zPxspzxeHlkm$`6q&id*kn)q2Ns7r>fpfBE4;QM+eqU@*fgcO%E|5
z!y@q;_*-?Hw%EL;+?~>ueMG`Y3GB2|ouhtOO|y}@}G3;HdbS)yFbOCHRkJ
zO{E6T=DCDzypSZI_7C#J49CaFGuyX^AD137pofU-HpmMOSiIy+?{Z1sh`djK(|dWw
zVhus#{6^Fup%KEo6|?`CnI-Wk<$EdAhbqp`tVNdib$c{iZO}?cfwQ^p3oE`v!~E~c
z5k^Q~{~%uR9Ls2Ig}RTa$d?!fh;tNNg*Od&oga0S@${e|Ky(Ho_+-+H>7@Dclx~DW
zoib_Y7AgnX8cioV6z`C+J1fI{|lcTvgNDCFmq6bt^u)f3tG
zy!rk*QR*Z+Yq9uqV&U`RSF&XCOQx5T=4QSDQv;L1jaTo2`x_1m?;KwKy#pnY
z6_+b<_R1EQ!R%V)g&X(a9RH!Ya+?Dh%1&|xb49vA08_IeWdM}bLYH76bCk62^5|Rh
z1&1W5At)3#uft_jlao&WfG`L_$H}%6I~m(mA2#G0ygYTA64>p&{)_TgKa|r{*Nz8U
z42R1S<@(1?2HNi6tiKPh8~hIhRTciP>2K2UFJs*Um$Io|r)VY!J|)~pioOz`Tv!^xk$rFIU}G%ICBNXj>g1y<
zbP#{5q^ox>E@H8b6L&~-c&@Jto8ZfCh2_1Rn|qo0UTSG#iu_F{bqY4T6&Z7wzZ}3Mw3aoA
zC=d@d6{VrdV5BoePijgnx?|+a
zE+ks2bD_}XH%wo#vVmgS{iSO7~j?FQD
z{?Kl!?f3g6<#s^@i(m!wX7Qi-wCA5!gG1hYSXW-fTo{a8WFN}L>*r%b>{WhO)THDuSNhpp|PeA$^YxN+v
z4mC__WO*~Bo1H&+CRMw^MjdZyCR2QSZDi{@Oc-(W&mM3S#ISPC(V|4$cO)`u(43#K
ziIy(XWlBMIRaC;kLI13(S|sf|Mx#%vhmwyrY$BufT_KCmK7Ia9KfZnbV${<5=ymU(
zWyjDS@{tAQSZnaKMIvnvi05Y{@Gb>
z8O9W0QPaB6Kc1wC*ImN~*+d~)*%I2`$V#ia?MCf6PgutQJQ0b?KA+mT$!UmZ+=}m?
z)Vm#=8U$3sGClIHYsm9FY29F*Jsjw9W61owe6M|w;KQL&u$*ovwS>I%Awgl5znBZ!
z`7`GmF84+^dizgR4+yYJwV__G?#oLnawbo)fETL)gB_c%y49=I#?^S+G$RE%N7FkA
zqE?yRV<=ZEmn(Dg{kx7-Pd04*N9!A4vmaLWDg>-NYS_#_A#>;w%d?Eqbv2wBVcUJ-
z$!6e!s2FD*YOO1wchXDACB0llkaJJWB3`1HNa2X
z=brS`71rrQP(i$|e$)5f-^X#qkzyZJQ`MiQo$7^27Y(OYBHe3^rvYVq&M{0gq?GRS
zh^Kx5D~^`^6}3H@&1(6cn!1kq=m)}+T`e^ATH07$V+!8jc)923Bzk3d&bn&*&G)?+
zrE)H{6q9((LgkZQZO}4oRif+aNe0qigx~%O5J6oWmpv3i=GtD&VXKyE<{$}trDKUF
zO@l#EMiyqfK4(v3BV^Eue4O*wk9GCpUNPmAU2G>OE|p1kVqITp0>0?y9n9fydBr(_
ziO(mY-&!z934-y_y{)0N4$=w19Q4z&nYoe*o~N%uu84|2ufXC(x+L#PhcGYhG%tEzz}Xv$MrR6bz@rIE;goU+7MebYd}6H;b~rP|fCkHT4H
zqBO-i0~%#c{9Y^wP{bnFEN~ona8IRoy~J^P?k>7KGxQEP=V}69ej2IeIsc99(QQ}^
zMSTrSsp3~dz*|HJQpMDzU8aKJv&ddjc?*w>LEcV6%&1!@<5@P=M)tApEUJ8+Jn`Px
z9Q%w=jHchZE>8~PgCFswxkeN%6@}xns{9-t^K7q&b6|V{{X*_D&9RG!S=FY%
zxr_F~TU|GuQ2wp3PxWH0MUNEkSpv^TrYg~}MB5nxekH&)wnes8LWjLNR;ZF&euD28
zRY=mrFZnLnl^bOKZ&Gcu&c|^2;#^U)3XzX0OX(z)Nru%RyPoR654J85EXjJOz4bIZ
z;w1)lzESw(!fhb8w+Q!pIkrs~BRY+Fd7mI1?W(!L6Su9|M|rn!7wx%xGnV`#@s-rd
zk6xs)@gx-obo?R8e#xk^9h@3SX)W7=bG^vr{bzyjJx1)f+1a5PACaKqdT+@m)Y^aR
z)Ok?{)Up2qsVGEyKy5_cY6y@1Deg(f(RmDMcHhx$Dvz2F>WX43-Nc=+N~?Q>^pE8t
zIEPeQe?)U!8f1%DdG1w$3J`f1l!zftn^P8WXs+TRg3fjiPZR}PejuaC{k*CvTHn@Pa;;Zky@RGs0!
z*gqevO{dDuB2LIpFF?59ikU&Ny&B95Rd;Q%f7gxhXpMEcLkhcup5xUYc0{TZgWVi{
z-W7>xhTaYOy+J*AqcwBWa4DNs()U{9+90hW^M_7x9@OTiVKDCx)@gM!T6$%Wc=k!F
z;fB>HgQ)U7pkyaeOl05YEJmd1|K`Tvj3V6f7_BVhyjm=MiIz0+-4W_Y6a3zm_^Ey~
zo3aKIoRRBE&tDudSD!Nu{EDSqcsat3`-#l2vsn#@9m&&B4j}s9c%D35CmK#st3CRk62K
zv0L|3*{frgUNuhc6oVowR8fT3)|IxZPt*2pX49(KVWkLxlkjD)fh85LEc&
zY9OASGl%+uGC@ao5y?Hhh@zJxW>=!!raT)lnT|t!BKqTP4F_@V9s4O{oM;}#dxnbu
zk!XyN)9<_6Bd?tc4fSLexf-5OObSTV8VK20xE`OKYFn$
z4z{0OV1aTPv0W{-QO-pFpmy4*BQ8ISYPGERQQW4e++NzOJ)#au3d0MF-}taP-3o*k
zCsDPR_tOHW$s6ww|7x2nsAg)BdW-48gB09Lf9^Tgy13m9+{`m>5^zfs;a}?R4q<+g
z;h7;{5@C;E_f26T?`vnd6=Yk|pOqd>;=8O02QN+GCEZcTSeZfbthJxW`cZ5DTHhF8
z9^9))n51>&~*=DXXv*zb5Qn*K36yzVE-T)*D&4I33;oGt&pjzD==nxw2A9
ze6Mv0xMty(=31?ZW+X>SdT^rxl`$bcAj_a+gvPXM_LBF+VMf=Y|@hrRhS=CARQZC0#EB@R0J#owqcU4TwQ5)}i0(W{*
z^P%d@WcKPpVz!t52juUn6}GG7rY-qM%pVdu2Xsc8`?`ypjq1i+Tt`wuK*yI3kfeom
z%T5bhk9R9{qj>NJ-KPJejI)l4s(au53?V5cl0!EL(kWd6N=U=dB`qBSLx+@fbC8gb
zZcrKt0SW0A5Rej(M&O;{d3;{K{>~p~U-Mbl-uJ!sJ~Ojs*1dO~Vk}x-01?MRjWbCd
zWG`%&b~Zq2X99%t;yu*Bja68)y;)Nt#N*eI5|Q9_Q*-jTUfzV+K{WKP5Dg~%LI-Xd
z6>)R@eb~W{nrNkiRhvU#Xdqr?S3ia_&Z{i7p$%H^N6c!B9ADetvcf*apY;{ZT8k@dE!B2eb)W@)Y2SVG+D(}>0iv$JHaGRMBWbqYt+(_m
zGd=y6Qath1YtnRwg3kdclc@Ei7prl)wS0N+F*?3}PLsCtQ|hGy>?U**T7#5aJ*8gJ
zH!Dh@y;};gm$M2#s_Gm~
z&nWlXU8*AD1@|A(3P+Up3^#I4q634~h<25z4bYHQWuRwU4{xer%q^GiJL4w5Jqpz<
zO+LW(?dD4!31z5|uYiq~@q_bRq$mT`6i(eNlcR117aOpqx1XfaUsa1EFD+8Fi|yu}
zEG~L|$6;ji>-?E#?8dYe^}?t)W{!KG4=MWQ`V^m)`+%(VDXG2D3vM#K9DANtyB&59
zhdd%Adfc>Ou)evr08VBNM2V_fvD%xA(=e8Vp!KD*57$qd!8w?KBfW5hdI154aE8{=
zc$0lix%2nlzRBv!aN%E#My1W$Vg4`7N3_aQss2i=x@xU3j)~;i@A4(QsTOTckv0$<
zDR1;RDr^HyuD~dRfY`@g`7Q;d@Xc8p4=c67Jvp((Z9j|cPh~}OgoweN!Uy25IrHyAFiK#o1eRvi=^Ov%%EHTa7PVXbzm1kkVwME
zR=`r~#r7zr%{pnweU*ZfHWji=5thh)r2`l;1Cmv=cJ70!&Iwrwj<0p)%UO;
zJ>)+5F^xRXDRum=)_m_1X{D{MoH17I5nUL{+1+O>VuG->U1J%*dl0`aiOVS|MuKYB
z`Tj9$oCgW%gozT*(TkUcF;RqW_hRyj<7LhDx7V7gKN0D^$q(hwSJHWF(CF4VMSYKL+=WKVB3ClD2-D7)@=`Gp+YZ9d)gRz8|
zR=ezBJdPwA$%g~gusQp=F4F!S;m>Z{9$E7gN5|_X96+lOafeD>vl?Luh8}A}^vJjd
zi^D$8;Mi{Oyd3u(%rrxMRjtOW{lq?z5B8^rLpCiBU{;(JJ;Y+aSl)5YxW_|2n$QK$
z;hFAQIAh}{YTF<5lyEs#d)Qrc5b_N4JxY1{G!p-1>dfQqGx^i^%u^t8l<}qaIMf&8
zR_O^eP*&*{aJ_C(=dY7+J^9o=@(doDWI`qiP`~lX-S;-%H}iE3>TKU)fHU0hy>HqX
zlC$mJKZG^XnkA!}rZnhFGK@ZFx?ucdu~C4I@rkW`w&wt6eQV!An`y~y-I!n*yW~zn
zoezs|`H;k>hCCa5zkBEjW-`iKl$eOUacZ%z=?l{w6%R8@-W@o;`{@5FvA&$sO7x&V
zAN_lZu)$ub0%l~Z5sE)7xHh%p%}=6If%>kRXo@OWq{SUJSQQ5kPM#9Opz%X!4cU}#
zyM0xxw61(VG@hP<{SL0Wqx$f1mj)$79crnmJAEeBW>N3-5I1sVrv$W9@+*|VcGx%C
zr1!Jw#K%-tk%;6V>AImQ>6Uj&4IJsDAHU-|!MB$03s%x3zj}E`At+NV?-k|cvWxth
zjyFyZEQh$x2s^-qv3*g(k$A?4)$ya%lzy3w;KKL>C8Ngih}X63ICTH>XlNpCqA8@c
z0~s~_YoL_a@f{jAPAO%Y{&j+!6_@^y^W;Wu4w$5dTxSv9RTah5%vEhy7OlQP;+Qr*
z>NLiW3yVUgxu`{Ux59&nt|%w+^?8bM&iK3_Sg!gRdAYRC{L?_;HmB5|{z7&b-SIS%
zKU~4t4TMtV_Jtzaq57Kxr#%$vbkt7$TMo-Klno>qv$rTep}FJ!E2ftiIwYe{0WG$icKvU}7(M^%P>DdFl-
zb`DWcc_)!P;KyH}brktT(F7SNv*kD@EArE02e5yHyl|V6pVzX$xb)qbr#K<4vo(sn
zF0>aQZIRJN{vg&7Mbf6BsneOugkB^e3sW7e+w3Qc^M#-p=VmGh&p1e%AdPmCnX8!VeQfXurYL?nqX0Puqzecdy
zHb}rBYn5>?bs}%-;o|jma7`vKf7!Fpp5BBx^*l?Cb*Zs@{U@k00+>M37fyI?{)@
zGIaw5O{KaCiUy}J*DuD)(}LQg8fRf$Nd}J~^bTXJ@3yUV##H$X^JSDxBccAQ=~ymg
zr2~csWQ#LahT$Xqt9(BomgqBO1*E6V5_`g^uQU{tp9>A-GUa$OF@BiP458rjEwIGT
zZ3ZhAl2G700dxX>jA!yZDI(l*=@x|AFjVSAS}1xxuhLLeWM|b%m%1{g#p{GAJN76$
z5^}2|UuuvRl(bo@xD9f=NkJC
ziKnt((Nqk(k3R39^^3?utHGS|CC*QeZ6_*WAG#~7|xVkSXwR#WK~eedvS+GCs+R!IU9v}mp+ejVJUcjym}-B^5Hui?j*c!Vo3
z6|&ZrhpT!lh&)y*?UT4TanoE+AtC)46&Ul{uO{h9X_iZJ9u@Nxn$ZS>9!%z0JuO_{7uh*v{ZuH^Bhm(nO>{in9yGccg(#WpAsJx`Mr5}4kUF}d#f$lcFTrAt7cQfHnnjvtmSV+Ihw*t)M+h!q=qljW>Q#{R%cRq
zr>d+k$1XVZ(*h3PzL7cDsDNSMFv~6pZ9;#fcp0$Bk{gp74n^7MmCdu&H;Wntis9h(
zF*8Wc)z*ozN)rskJd8pfD6XM=9+#VF;@5TKgyWrVFl!&`^29B6%Q7M3A#Nq}HSgyD
z&(_yI%143bY=Pf>y!H=zAF83!mN3cXfkY_6>cuZB`7QjczttEG#frn^;$(g9GJ~-C
z@O9JgXFe{lP%Tq`hGe?P8TDrMd(5Jk7vy}>A^BU+=!3$|JE=3;_uNokHld2f1ubQ^
zU1aIQSWjgun`fDs69-c;XAL+s$P?eM1{?8KA^gs(6q*DnBB{A6;`#e*B5M{_0S;I
z*#ioofQH(UYPd@xiJGt;@1EsKMHLYNH%)1B;5aoO
zGN;PuE&*vZr-=*c9JZ8p(#uG9o+?}rTb8L~yF>-HK92s-ox%ae`p1KQ-mk)nt%GV^
zf8ewUCh+FX;?c#pF2Jl!C`AMW-StaH4lTFmtCYV6LdBT#@vp)Nf1MhkR_{~A;4Cj#
z*ZewMzCNf3xToEpf+jETQGDKE(2c(!qDLGVw8^3OO!-l7uCp(F1!w{bMX(@Iv{{z%
z?n)YPu5EZ_c4+h7rM>Fv)lHJqO)hD}Turad@b#yUH{xGc#NWZHj^ctvO%|m?hDmQs
z*)(S{=f}&yEe252yUH=Hd5qht)vX4D3#7bc0YzZSdE!9SkgX1C5)AT@Z8^c}T*riH
zuzQ28=Q}SIaIBRvyOHWQOhHMOuK|@$kqv*Q+#IC9_%7#yw|Y@gGr#v=UP(ECnvIB~
zEySS%v1he&3t2D%-=4y<4^mHLpYh)f34#iI*?gHWfsvWp)c-~95Heq9Mr(ClEG+Cg
zgi|_Y-R`~roUv~IXyi1ddt1eoT2i_aO|nBhqw8}TR
zvHG(av1beule=+dr)l8?25mEUGHr;ROuuy(^B^-lVFiW3rkMi5Ub-e?svqO5#w52A
zfifw^)SHX!zIqUr})Y6qD+k`6f5?!rCS8$BYEc(NbR+fSJo+*E>
z{4|s%9%U!C4G{@-i_znsBUn|XuQ=bwh=)1MFkDtru&ZQkW65jta*{mJG*yhZb;H^^
z%VoCh7<~i#0`rnr*b@AVF5d7_Hef5;ql>{(K#SqCmPQg8>Utu}4@S?#;Rh;016p-h
zL&q`?Nakb8
zZ9SrKgEN-es!p~?uV+NJEX7_J?Hv8Q`EczW%}4Lyo4ldJ7FLo+y*c~=*`fTNfnZhD
ziB%@@zLEnhVtHhsyEysa#mND6_X~;Q9YTdQE?S3--VNd74i=v2x3RmX7P#tPkZoQ)
z6Cxv?{1%`TNVxxzm($si)d=(B*0O|Z@l%f3nIk1*P3dzQ4!8U|i(b;C7wjC9y*Z2i
zNedi4Zk?4lm`3*tkcvYq*9zeCe%3>8P`&w)KefZSPIJ!iuCDpfws35ke4~3tJ>G0sst%c#^NpoWwxnpL
zszHn_F|#2tY;1jBC0o=x##bCajU3r25o<>K!J&ag&7`)%w~Loa
z6EGG#;TJHZ6C~8u5Ra~mO*gA+%{sEyEY+4ME+71A;%&y=E%dZuBI%U(_eSFVdgCQq
zE+Kwxx%6L4@KO~Y=A}JJRtzxo;SQO3p`^1c_9;?4^O1Q~<=(M}b<5Q?Fq7-6Kdkpc
zuHW6(N}SUZ#kMEFa=-#3LOD*kdCYY#W)=3%tIG8{LIv}?!Z*=#rr?TYURp}>3USTG
zY)$4t3nCk~>|PF50zzgp;y5ZL9Ye}4=PMMOuelVo+pF%tqb(EU=o9vQrn4J$w4Jq^Uhw}3#_&qqgeJZ>@XcZj%Lb@RJ(tNygm+;Dg;drB7Ucb+EV64(9{AKZSi;6p-vh&%TE8^!
z1uvj1@npO5m%A(U2RADZy)e_Mt8>6>(N$bv5YYV`v%*W5$ycqy>w%_^@4hY`|GGP)
z_{9D6(=#vun$uAMweXO#KP`6ze{q%1@D+2QbHdoom!z=?mpWg?^yH%;30-3tGZIzD
z;%n*7xfLZhvH^Bs4e%n1SH$;alm+XTc`dEQrJX{Qef%$u8tb8B8}V*U
z!I2*E#K8+Nxeg_aQI*a_Qaa}5P^f~bd!T{&1gBE+v+5adrDBczB2nb@@T17?98tXB
z@r@s$YQ+@vtjvbHu~_n4cC02a0$Fv;_IrHk>{%HPB%oM1*))sy^O2n(qlbxsm?y={
ziAHH28tobwgn{DD%WpQEX5Ome#p$a}J*_yN9+VUlmJ-?8Xsb|ulT|tc3;&M<{KN_AWCV^
z-E=10KG`K5`qfIyHF&R%p!TaBAf_21YFDSEH%wz1e>R;cJJ3NF=?Uw((tlpoI7Lk*
zicx89ob({M9^ak%@rMPKLGLg_f7(uGwFfd{^z1&!P-vg7W)F*{xnWPvzHy-cz2H)M
zK@z#lvi&QLFTN=XMb(ZcutvP+eRhTF%HkosP5zKev#a(yMC2(O%cF(agvDOWliis$
z&R=bI@0<8&e{!JCOv`m+_A{q5c23oO&cn6A?%N#{9!k58nL{YU!q<3n8Q6JaEqveM
zCWK||VT?-Ug`p;;Z-b%%P-!H)Vc;Uf>uq1RLlJEfm^dbW!>a2?Ll=7{-{Xm!BGf9v
z_T}z1@s)e5*u~}z(w`@(wxKWagZJeS^@SG<0^nF7go-p002`?w)K0kom|PK|FwO*A5oUxc6A^KM!JJg;4?vR8X7`n-Uxy@Z+)Lpgun~f2v&wK1m;HgfUm?tU|xhE
zCJ_QlA%s3$=>B*1H1GlblK<}i91aWIz!^Igg8g@ff)xma1N!qK29!vJz=#rXzy>ZL
zU>+b0-m=_wtB6A8A_Rj#l1LyB`JcT&BET@*#fs>5dD|@Yy`L+_!lHErH_pq)Ug8r!OyY%&75430tp$@`-IHE;^R34yz45R>M4&BKwh3I>IbBK_qW
zz~@a_#^)shBH?DlNtb0Rblg^@!dGFn-EQ
z{GCN90Q=8%W7=|W+z}acpBm+_ES!N(gbNXE6EQfl*OGin%#u72KtcI$T5NCu0eb?E
z;q9%_;T9|bk-tF|0w6!IQcIDvQX^thg>MZ3fe=TX|9jH#-ZR_ad?ZkJI6Q+tmI(x+
z2k@!jgWk>*dg{;IaTH|Gce=k_b3xFQ{U9h2UZ5;y=i>`5AV_FuKm%d`
z#B9wY2sjrwhqt#gLB#?GDB~zXU|<=3yZ?VaDxApM4R7EPld=AeSOdV|otf`^gMW#E
GK>rVXkNSK7
delta 24872
zcmb5!bx_>kgYa?O-6`(w?o!;LxD_v2q_}PI;>C-*yDnPX9g4fVdy!uF&D^~2&D=jX
z!{~MSb9G=
z)%!(@{`tO+>rGFtsHR6mI{LCr#!2AYWU-|EB5kOmob>Vcch}M={Hk{$vj41DU7?|{
zEcv>iAWKs>#i&&mQ(Cc{N$B)FzAU*^a6t2H1axhH9T#_}iS*l!%Q)Mxa7B`rwYp5H
zHE*m#P`-o07i)hgKUta&Jit+Yd3cXak#1<4q#dp>mS?)w?i*-Aw);wTlXSU*(Q3c0lPSBOB{U0r1xP#Md`n`Zfqc8M
zMq4lA%H2LakJku??vbvdzg}aGR4*W8l0bFwjiUVxtX%T)RA^QkW@$J2QjKG+&7oht
z%K41L(wMb*^R%^eQqI_@OTEg5KZmhNky+$_Fe_{9)E?&b`7G~2KL*2>`sC#wK2NF>selA6V__DITs^9bA}VMClAytZFYuu$HWAI}#qI^c6l{Q@*c$0#93IU&ah*-ix}%#acoZ@m0#;w5f(#QE`;i&DeY09kj_Kj{Cy03iSuAOocd
zA`Ay7TnLEcgr9I!1bK1_F49`c&1Y5X5r@ZDnqFkJDX0;_Gzp_{93T}|gwY*J`J1`0
zNRZE?6h1!a`EmAH*#8`4Czu-ir;Yrw*z0b~%xGc7Lq|tdRW(IEQJXDAx~28+Y^U*9
z)g@o`reig$=$q8gGfyPe3#9*QjUc60gDDwny!TU;d;&5SzSsEm-(KlY`xhS`RWIWA
zDD_2Uz8ycQ%R%D_&w%|g>+hkpysZPj%d^GR_X&
zM(tTj!rhCVQfHh+#44)a4&x@hjPT^K^JQ3`GMapgniDOq=?&gOdiq7p;~N!YeJ#sr
zBOk5sV=ek!WI&5IO%_^>gJ%@}sxF2jcQ#jY&xKkPGOePF+Br<~iK~UU8CEl&=tl7`
zZBFQ8y8{G%GHt<>P_AExC_wSfgtX2)?IM>iNNdEklCRY1a%xl)UR}twvqqviLBoTi
z7Hr11TNzTJZTJGoE0ISKHOS>&gB1cbX-eckn#)W5;-H3)*Nj*}x&HDybtT(o&yp#d
zF<4N2^Im^DObyZ78f^2JUq2n1(fEF#@989p1nEK+Yq964`ur`ylg}=fnJUh~7bCPa
zpZpMGYyGt-m!X9%^1wA=o{d{kr*it6a`@Uu7C*?8QMb{)-53SD!2RcHgP`GM<|VyI5s)VP_mP7ZYokQt!{
z)LNS2tU*C)$u>rb3>h#ei@vh3TxX6sC^h|6_d0rMjC~9k#XfyDva9#Rp4eP_O2gxG
zljPS{L`ipW1x_^X4F$(#^VgnM*N?loi+Fmq3OgYBQDZqxE$NKB)Ji$14=OhiFMC`2
zRe#H=1niQCwT7mXi7WH_j9*GqAM+EKbs+|?;ZM*x7exdQ6dqr>iwH+`?$R{Lp}sY~
z2IW`POlQ0DLuQ}~S_C2SR^aZZGce;!1o*U7&^J+*dYte2d|ANCWyG{Ih2}E-0>hl`
zBeDyEiumP1H7i0x14)J;QEFAnbrnavCXR%$XVd76yCHl=%}(vXruL)AnJ3DTHOOE_
zgJ6I+ziXdx&x=BemqFX7z&u$3!Y905B%IkpMPZIqn_64|(k`DzVNQ}+6%A3Z(|!dZ
zs~|SEB3OxKxtefoWZdSuOQhgvET@sHiSP*|-Gc@l$vT3YQ7eXC*3(l$)6CIen-rmZ
zw{LWUBsjR;VBho{U&ezo&k7%hzhc{1$e*ZR_+w5%aasm)HoOW7Z39MB;i*(Y+
z=%yYoTf-O;R<2Q7mPDRaMZU0WaDcp~NVQh+Tdp-H3CL=GQO3W>M$G0R74IQe5GZoxBKru
zh|JxF!4E&-w5)X_ZNJ~B>3(l$Jy{_c(j{!BLhY`QK+r>Q0%|Io
zqG2jp{8=UJu!f3u*>_64<+w&IIg>=6r<9wCPnY#|3?J0c;Hg3`obbi}1oaFfyr?(F
za&1eSB*s0ZAYVUVDR8lJcp_mk77A#dY$KxPn(d*fOdWO!X-H3Vd`FY&Qz|8~_^tqV
z_ybZWT%CPRIST5Q%enVsMkHvL{z#|Z7H($ZQ1S<|R|d})cka8YPJ^)s2P10wH!8L)
z&g6>4ZXtUjDeH#aCpj~WEEz06X1rvZ;zk(?&5~*|4fHW*=5j*wNdQWA0N+u_HIJBSeH7C8xS+|POxDInWlpHO`hl@b0u^i
z1Y{lsOc!rqrQK3+Mxn8j*kH!$cZUfCVe5iHZ?)12xL(1lQNj}6k3TFU1ZQiV=M~F*
zUHZ&7S7nV$w`V2-3!rL<3SDd^Za
zCfr?BkA_7&8#Z7Xf}jUo3wV1W$JJRuC7mafws-kvgVXDkV5q8Uf*rWD!FMC-ZLS6F
z&6d#{KSsFAzeKxNI9s|`TtV%ZtXJaNP3`P_%h1#}rj%qXtA_r%)hSYVmqvXQlf?9=
ztE4)eS?{$^SA~(DW4((Q+Zf_o$DOeHZn#1g40m1*EsJWy-mn%ZkjR$S5FzOnu?o6+
z{Q#`JwwZ?S1a6=GTuAbLi-%q=WLI$6)$pWC{STxx9S6}(1>_Fp
zDacgba|2{yt`Tm~M<=O&7?a3}O7#boLgdpMT65Yzo{|FWEIq)=x271Y4?v_sU_@m=h3Rd%|tq>`b$F&;3~iScPB
zAx_MG9fxoHy*rsa#}Y}xUsvg`$DWF9uKwA+sr>IJ{*}QVXvWx0Ce_GOfNmqAD2mW?
zOlncNbtythvxL*sEzzpV^^>#NuPdY=Lacli4xN@oB`*9n^O`S~t~Ew$wAi1LXT8&{
zoUT0Up;yK#-HV+W-D_{u|`NArv%nNYl+in{P@UCFePrHcu(F<~E$0VzM?HsXv+h
zZ-0UjFfZ2qa2%kEic-U8o3sl_h?twHuPLhYId!%WUx
z&IGyh|(703=iC
zmYoBhd^aTH*SGs}s;5pSm=bDnu(J)*ZV$v?Ns5E~k3)WSNI3XH+Ey64QxKj*pQ^fA
zQ;ban+7JSr)7!tMTP6>*=NJm!p6B<5u^Pc9;mSyJYqIuv%h(Lk-#a17lv?~*szD#O
z=XTG5L?2X$xqeNp9Y07wn
zXEU43>u%(VUF%J>&sLO
zSyhJ!lh72`;2r6Eja
znoUQ&VY<@XyBecJ9@ceX28l*&jognug7cI_A$nEa2`B6ceH9vbz!Mlj!l
z>D_W#)S?Y-%soWUUSHgH;{8y^k%b=?Z55AN1Lmq2g^>CfZIl3?VgIvg9)_vV--=i)
zO2FqUqkS4L&9gryv$d@W0&l+d}8gC&2_1S
zaa??mOs$;+*Lokl9|}CppaBZzQZ;Kv49XR)Obh9JV5ezl@pnSM6IQ7x?m<`d4ps{~
z-KS>7AkUuSsk0Riq1M&$d)G5JvqYr4FaisnUjjKaFMs>fS@)4iV={14ZDRt1rwFu(
zRDQr`aOFj)^A2^4lBaxwj3dKIIPO{*+~Xt!g^^x2xzaGZ43ks#FLI(KM_aw!?SDOX
zCi>_8-0#6qix6PApH<{3j!*MRb+`O#0K5>QUKQeZBy!Cb`V1PRd=CaFILz2*
zoaIMm3pLq>P^Lq_d#5Ly3?5-DQ))hw<}e{ojT;>NspmPGQw+g(Hi
zceHVJ2F2_j@?M{OcxIOqG!YX4S?-|V@iQVkhH0m{ggV{zS|7oW^Iv3h3C@^qy<(+I
zGx&wSZ4yML{hCHm50E6BjG4&0m>YKrRvK`O-94QCSe=eaylI%lB>3W=qmb032}xx
zN6t#L(VlBqZwOAS`|_0iRGJZ-E{F#eu4dCCNIPmHz;%8`Sw`qzIawy76YnzN=iAGo
zG@Hp&PHOc2PnxtM>l4|SayMZ(4n{-OG*^93;tTbWYxwq4S*UjqQHz@$5zivy?yWP#
zKD@oE+KsJc$FyD&%9Zz`-J@Zf!e-e{adby5h?*%y_Zq;NVm;SwZtgLTB
z9cC-$B!Fo)GlhC_JsUnz!Lc(ZS2ec$%>-`-L-E=2zw
zd>$TmAMNTFG2rxFOS(McY>1p3R{@MXjfKKkGb8v3#wqdEDy`DG`5FIB
z6nw`rQnpzE)~xf2r;}VntKEk@(fpq}Ey;G0aT+In-hAxMThJ3A%)O7&Aj`wM38fe6
z6Mj}GV#3cef;Y%0=Z9+X3{M^5T-twZdWIbB2c77|{hS9bqPk
zJLz@skvrXUcs9t`0dAZ8|pLaPO
zIx7xNaUdX?>sg8aLW2<4{BmUyB*dm98+xYLbL2;r!OHp&QgjHr^RAJF>aJ5b6Y(f|
zSlu&B)>Cb1min4n(Klv9!JZt+&@=~jnpn5Gzc7b#vZWP<(NLW9>)i3tj}4hd*PuUJ
z${|2iTNSUB?`4~e2auf8M{)$$=d6r>Cjb6LPl!7>p)!Z`4?IZT(Hf>$w@YuT-nLz%
zm@DGySy8+1Baf9zP||Wl9|GNe=4;M3*T7y~gI|Xkl?x4!VBTRz*2%MGb)xeg}(CtX#P*I_O2lnU3a-FBjg2h(l9QqEcFWcEhaY8rM}zxfWvh
zX$QC0`2O|UclG^-8(w4rUml$_+b6-LUP9h=Q;tWcS_H!>ll2QdLm)E+Ze_|9EJ<~z
z?teWIG21yNo65OA3;)fscq@BlxK7EJ3jTaCo2PA2=&TuJhAvz+hcfbq4KF0C3!S0a
zE*Y=quRJ5ir#=?ITj^YmEEJ{*p
z?}6zUaUxxIK-wDZW2D>8YWoPIa^aNvjntKmeO)@qRGO8$L
zGzbZ$wcwRwLipc>W|KO)go?8xVvl-?!ZH3q2JkJrWGC6Nlk=jPIeGGZ&eUF1
zicsATs8$t1QH$4_OYw>jlDyI|s6WKE18r{3#w_%pGF6+Xw6#s4bvOz!x_Iu$k0AA8
z+uO>KvmNXVz>eD(O{u`~taF6pdwdGnJ?qrgt3}i(P4-8cTFWV&bV$Y1cv&WrZkSu|
zwU-?Ecu0Ah%MS6$AXcNMNL|*oKoF}h(uBRRamSxGH*vx4%3(ASvoI$hx>qQY!bav7h{Hit+K*ZFv|Elmzt$Er(ih
zysNv7e;1Axmqcs{Ise#8uZ=-Pr^<;PA2zv96q8c4S$0O`7VOfb^`#v!#YVv4p6P=P
z`FED?J(dpiGL5Vmc>V$tg_CFpGx#d`ZNvvNH@z*lA+z@^MlH8`yX-2Xg=`tga*%3v
zGP*PJ>T5mV*bihoM*QPZJ-myu4$pJ{a;kp3P*&O@Jdaj&CC@>XAGLsN=wZ@Z8EdZ)
znWbDKYA??l87C;~*)zhol~BHLZk}dh6(btjf`$}+>m|?f+Uc@v(=>#nH>hyxVqr^h
z64A#q)|TdZqFmun8ZYfrY<7cJ*}M_sz0Am$l}kB!ushH
z3UU^(1)v5rR1K>m3(QR%jw`|k{X~_JVL0-_<6Qbh3
zdzy7}vd#)Bi`pJTeY>;l9Ab
zJ&@u@W-R4%IN^~cKLWuS@AZKE1={Wpm#L4Uv$&p^>c|jUphxsp$#hEpjQBDm!OZy<
zw;b}XG7X9$r}SS0-^S6hUHF|ShmXJ$gEmVqPWtY9+Q*K15^4h@~-58FIU$i_iWT`*YW4W|`tx8o@^^998C2_n)M
zk3I3{sI`Z0j~A||YYmcS?w;YU*(5c3qv6)f<1rl>fHHa`nT=`d8F)4MJ|;Tl?QX9l
z&)XcbU>8r#HEeyUb80&Lq<@S3Auic{*?h@5l9q$JLoH~%2O9VGh%zB}BCF0+DQE|p
zx4m8)k8Q1qo446uc{om1P^~i3hw$L^hy;!s3eM|gnpxPGREFTKw@~6A^+ZUW_E%-`
z(25hfVbBL*6m2&hws4=#ZRrJu*^d3e*tW%&AG={;PqqgLPnIa&Dw7pErj=hKD=`wAH$%c60)?uk?jO)-l=3CH
z9}uIF>SuE{bQUC~ifBd`ZW+f^g8Y|}=#4j)I~&@tDyB>osQ#UDA8NKRHBMF^vRJZz
ztdQ!A7$q}A3H^fol8l@E7MwLFx{?P@!bShRj*8yNERikb^wIjwd6%zkX=$&Y2K;4O
zW)!541YH~`<$Sr}w<*=qkMyfBXN5#?9I-K=aLtDO)+@i=-#0;G@rcl82s6NIqy`m&
z`#WD#;nR}RW)3IEK%fjw)*~4BuR@nT_ER*zgkH1}!$^bcUN7%gY$t{jC`Jdw+un
z<2-&8@ke6b!-iWYaYZ1^u7brf+KzvHNjUk%_27o$U4`B_e>t*mmu_cueu8_-Z2QM3
z=#=($VQf{0%=*X>mDeyYoQ0R`p%N}_vZl~V7d30ulIz=snv-cAu3^Tf^r%UZ+-Jx;
z=g;C!xnI}`ja9$!rXdSot6i4G3v_+}t*v@}4Qb>>*Az>Kj}snyno|QGjQODk#t*D2
zL$wH9s82q({%m8U9NkN&A&-~R)MrJ+cWs@GVgSo!NQ!rp*3%_ZfE
z!p2P>NsT#?sJ0-9t{75LAA4hxO<&>#>A7S5^Pbz^l-hQOg#$MFO8d@~6i}Y}W*F;y
z^MX;5K!V6mXRNGP8cq8@4oveTp!^6_4*R^*?AaiOtLC6UQ=Zze#+C9F+OD+2-KGrJ
zCHNowixPFeqIr+pgkVZ4`k8&o`{pQv>
zn2mA>A!%Y9&KF9nJ({~$JagSwuoaD`rL05CMW;@NO91-8qJ?LL(It=Xn0n_kP?dh1GU3I!+gq#);=A5{cErEw)5L}N8`f#=C9~Q=wpG{bBIgp
z1`}?{0#AtaEsr``%-4Ue4_7-Y*<|bg4zhewiX}*ZtJ-yKLG(FADYY2q)jf@Xb=`-%&CkKAwaQqK9GkFL_8qs0
zVuG)dR5=wp{ys3~H5$wkDFZdFg-^KpS%9vCTnsvdUX69OO2X7mxI)&jH0~RkXGJ2O
z>|uiETD3pxO$BD6pEhW!%v?Yj>93TtwYX$g7n{y*dhO!bGwdH*1p|tnKO;}|`x5?=
zr0kxd@YTaN`$oM~GR{T=>mo~L%Kh8!ETxiF^#2Ij+CyZx^d%S95%)P~jtx`k9l!q|
zA|X)KCHMOCUBEA<6(K~Y$6$+V+bK2T6k@(>>7~2FpX*?bL>~@R(LpuHz)O;GeiGGs
zgNBaUZ}Z38BOG#;Z^iAv?*rF~YiA32Re8nk$NRnVofLJaN~Cm($UVD{$%_`R=Etrw
zW%+mD-^w2BSauMz<|WS?y=*TQnf?;^vCl=O7*G#wyWwsOi{U=6s9PJ4h(Zo+NWKr=
zK9gu0teQot&maVz!tYA1DZHOA9m{Hji}%v0uEhQcaWz{#l6}Iw$QlwWatS2(+WCC`
z5Ay%Ni&8Jf0S5&HrPECx9kE
z3!n|q0qBDHzv$h2yl=?9p$E_hvu_wQ7Q7D}1Q`O10LI{hpwFC
z>|yB6s`Gw;;(B+02f!2H1um}lE)jd5P`~j8_yBwXegJ;}2=E;c00;yG0fNEmHzBb9
z`T6QXhKA`vh5>#6!T}M0NI(=I8W01B1^fiW0pbA(fJCq^WKvxP@XBD6swB{V&Mg`?
z85|9pa%A-2B1
z4suT)7`dmPl=^*lrv3i&$oEkqmjS>aUYz3
zm<9X+%mL;B3xGwy5?~py0$2sC0oDNmRl*ahqX_5lZgL%7;pkO1)KrS
z0T+Nvz!l&c0Nno&x&_<;?g0;gN5B){FW?#Q0(b?y0sciU3qi&L-UIa>==Z?92lhR1
zke$my@Q|7|!26G7FNB8#g76;1_aMCo`8_D_L46O}d(hv5@gB_gV7&+XJvi^deGlGy
z@ZUr59>Vv0cn{Hgh~Go<9@6)ay@&ig6z`#Y57m39-$U~r+V{}ChyFbb?_qoo(|efT
z!}1>1_prT(9kP?XkOR`<=>5GV$8bUd;ezZ;j^T!cC3qjpEaHaj%q-%896tb7JMCk5
zAq!y8-Y?FY#XjMqiVzSZtl8p%{E#@EoC&;;*Hob5lEJ@!db~$s0&ISr_B6&i5)hNB
zh-mgA5VxOZ6O6SuOYBtNxC|uK1>KH{5b!O_MeQiuJi&d!Ieb+VVLz~eB@wmKvE!#t
zhwR%jb!m@FQYt)1uV`(8#TGPh?ESB8h`yLBCzY?_8}Kn9ezbx
zyTAmrtwuJVZGPN=SI_Elpzng%)xRx5ut13!MvgLi1o3CZONx3Ubl-d-u?2eGCF_~v
zLl;*0RE3=jtVPHjg=^<}H5!U&@d=iR3*Ci$$>ME>w1q(2+9=|RNUsMw&dn#mQ2zRj
z%Ekuj>p=KtWgi@+QZ?Dd<`DrNKYqU<7KaW{$qQbgj_OOg`dW$f204P~nwqH{QQSk8
zzOYaRtRy@65k?QG;!f$$SUQ6z*KuyC=dxLW5!OnVsVO2!8Al2}pK*k5b7D$686awJ
zShz18f4(*Cl!O`}9>lU6*w7}u{gF>fc4(T4qBQimXW??)eobTC!Zs0T(n0nkRks-i
ztxePI)|ArBe1w|EPCHTtP0a7_rHOIRv(8gmD>!f!YNX&cGG}&<(3qa9mkcISXxmJN
ziAn3<;pMZO&IVWc>nnr#>y&^n{O`(G*$*-WjfIIXofEBOAmOwtp*MFBlZsH%Z^Z*?NZ)U;5pX50E1wi}
zH67K7N!l_~W>!pFcqH6X;=|V{v5y;THjRBdH07KJT`(gDY=hYU)VIx|Sv3KF7KS@}
zT@icimc@Vg6UJ~m<5d5|E*D^lD6&o5_uS8~S
zs20M~ZvFG4w7lzS=
zJ}X4qXMfuh4A8*+&JNwvQI}PcM;5|ima**OWEik2-IGyKo8-S0jf!XEp!wj;I}f&$
zo4Il(3@WW;M9qt1Hs1}AID!T(M}zD}=~8sc-gJ$4h8`&MXY&X1Zham1$$_l?
zdaU?))n9h~pVxRyyEy-X-Ox#hKx%u7J^5YZ_F4WYYrQUA01EXX#eMbiro^ayfHVBUT4g=sHhB5vV;{-_`hYgl3Sxk
z$035xNr#Y22rG;3w>5i;4+KjJ6nWwZqxAzsqQ;wvC7HjZPDm_ymcRddiki#x7MU<_
z2x@xw?m5;iD
zKRn;f#dC-AIfuT^>tD8ik)%&4pzw`Y#`}4a9t;Fk8=PNIA)EX9pjJ4(D!Nny9l=c9
z94dOfU>Zv%8}pK%)rP03Tu+rBNuNTs2t*fSNsla6473Lv^?jzQ&+Lv-zMtHrKTofG
zaf5J>u;bgGFJ)#D8XP+67#R=eg%J2)cp8s<2M5{FoyPc%TU{Rrjce=JUII3Z)kF@*5DY|AzX)0nFj_3$lmA8AJNHuP
zaf!_8W|O@upA2e;^8IAFC?SSZL{kW@b%@iHvI4<(nt)2RwYubCShYz6{TZKH=WWr7
z_pNs$rt4xUy%C}N;Iw0|vtkmpRvPv|1W|=<{!JZzKD^0o`p|^dtZehbqrd9!uQ`T;
z%3N3W2CCiaSK!%*lO*Sry$T$#fZhnfLeEoGY0eh=Pe`O
zs6w;Xi4pnr)!$Y>FJU>0$F?hfChYJz);Y^nuCEzfp&vG95~fThpp~}`abSK_@p9~|
zmQmU=kaVL;0x=EU`K1-KnUjymE7jeXQRrBN1Wa-U5?F8urcpPIiidV5=nyLV8%uo6#(`voe0W(!VNhY)k%3d@u{clA`%;jAk{)7g9H
zC_gTi!IO+Kt3zaFz?3D<9Z330TgJNt(8#$yFu-ca(qYlNVP}&lO%8_5l|8!&XXk(5
zjEH>YH82&aI@D_ac|8$!IcMyhxZ=xE4SyT_$}R$WNc-LH^zG{E^p$r>EekO~pJ26e
zWYM{jc^KyTb^%Rd3Ph!qLFB#Fca3?lhMGk#vU)Pllb>3TExEKL_DMd6OTnql9F)9Tv@O5=t2
z&Sx=@_=UnD(zfuLiUxtmi|^C+9S#~AJOTCQ?#BxE%O*UO$tXQ34`<*3?2X~1j-arG
z{4ow%wQ7RDTW52hbcC`OXlkYv!(0012I>sKM%{)iJ@PX$wY&NK6n<0OpcKN*#*N0(
z@~FWLsoOc@(CM}g$6?{=%c}
zl6m3`h^KmS=kIP94%KVTOZ%;a7oy?zk+mhD5z(RQYx2Kc6ISSXE247&=CbCs7}5}+
zzuyc50efl3JiG@u~d5Sqfh^&5SvKijP-(=OLb&7CDbit(x&2V9xwa}
zV+vc3oJM`nbi|c(i}~v{83M-7d_6z{6f;_Nsfz-hELeXFX3dxhxh-#w@YB@ST@2ni
z?`p?uNFv@D_-(0o_{UqJK~1PE@R{L5SZdXV;a6U~pGf4DYJZekZ8=@)
zW5DowZ>OW0F{9k7AN}AXZalVVv@K9wrC%=W`7PH`Aii^r9Z+votq43H!(iZCfWcfv
z1Cvi#r%)%2@O6y8Hdh4$n-IT;287LN-nM32*ZqcfJL9bw@SHt&)81L0j-f=t>(-VO
z^A#=rNopOFbl9H{yx@moHD#8LM(DBLKtI;K3jZi}n`b_NO{wqJX)!?Z=wN6*N}&ZQ
z8_Jm8?7!;l48{4pl
z?{xp;wseOQttr_Gr#J=cDz}DBK$m9HaOt}d^r!h2}R2uEtWO?wsVT*11v_pGH_GP{3Q-9eG@@z)gl-AicV%V;v7io*
zB@mp*I_Za`^}s=^U^akI1nf&`U=*L6D#oiv2#sk6GcSK?hHafB$dzP@Pjh|zH7(Yt
z=Q1t-k8UTJv)eZ*#hq6gMCiV_jX{w8h!$H&TJ)7VewXh{iCtgx{=phz3~#_7`2h6%<@eWD1knx}euYrD_;TDz
z3HV%09Rm+s8#7)45ST|D7xLIh?5Z(h&+~Q?m2qzsgMW8hvP>akO<9{=>!Pws_J<)-
zEe?66rOKyvJgKw6A2+^=JJhe~wk$tr+fiKt%xYyqNc%}@zF-DAk$e*tZs}a`)}HS@
zP8d-kx0LTl`VjD~zUMchO2@u2k+@WY8p$p!O>!Hpao!fvHAt`XbDrl9SiL6X4X4C&
z9bOq5g9Q{}bDcjw!$cK4BX+dn>Ik<48Xs)FOrRpBMkm9+GA^T0C$TvIVX&sZA=!k|Osa-uxm9|T#mkOJ>q7p9
zLfSTymPyX06&A!|T3TXImQ>b67&nED0iOK>?mv5%1Xg0n-NIo*BU1QiZ#CW0x_;j!Y!t$#@P
zs=o0LRzXjYLWT&RW^rgF2UVW8gp5CggB!owiS#N`^4LmTU5=8yOp>5qpXI
zHp-P}H8Hkms(I@W!=d9J{y>yQi5dqa%YT8~tdSysm%WLYouaP`b&vWqSjwP{5a2#Y
zqOSH8zv6>XJ+5c(+p2l;gX5@o>Tq}NanT~zCr{#7n*RAc3a9{3m;oye)QS0uiU
zTF*6}fiO5$HDHr*hK$XaEDg3ke=?|Dv;?m%}`6xwqp9Y
z_VK^UIP0(|*0+!E!jjS*OP4gLbV&;c(g=cdH%KE(OP3N-14u~=!U9USD3a2R^dXea
zcb9WK*ZJ|zANzdwGvB$Nd+wdtx!CLGQK$&dBtT2rS$y?1Ud3oSy~X>e81E?@ZY;zP
zlaZ@Lpo(7w4#oN8mDMe_3zga*A&%~r78?NH8173-9>rdF_pGKkVm
z4{$2YdPF0P-k}Oc-3$AW%#_t1mFtYzqQES@dRf*_bVQ-CrG}#g`p?>@%%5Ua=Av0)zIYIYF
zI=WKlsl}QF)V7WJBlTXLi3k@X2t#D7A$9TUFm$aObx3ny9zKilv~y
zNSK?tzNxHKjYl`8>_Se8>{@u^N0oh=G4Heq%rMv_
zi7?=|6GvqV$
zr-6?Xg=g&J49Q(<$W@$VziyN4HH4six
zOiy=Ssm&~5QL+x>J5@hIJ!-dg`!~w?Jnke-GP)Q~+C^($OPjrQje1rFOZ(iV?Y3sm
zRk}6Gmpoh-B?Nig%98AG*Errzhv;kde7(E?9tML^XfJ+vMF~Y)S4EX#zW8v%
zFpkIh@^A8qa*+98&**MWj8XtM2
z!-&~KzSw8H`ZPyieYxVz0n7SQFW@6|(v^JRK&4YO&{3StL(||N-7dhlRTI4Li!;>G
zl#5cHndc??Q_bjs*f^jPvGk45<#|YP;DmRbT%=M=N^%m(5AnA~MHHo)e3FJNl#eL)
zBYraAsWDnBC{5T^Lz-5JQN-=@O31$6-z4)5BbdZO&nBll_u3A!G==4g>Kfehvc#FF
z@02+stEdpw
zh}AQs{hqP9++)~K-!i&PT~ju-l!a@A=df65aslZ`$?$mu0cTIfdAL=h2
zb!ai}?$yoq3zZ&LXSRK>z%ODr>f&R(2zK6-(eG7a@?^$1kV;yta$FwEJ`4+=mSe
zt*=~6zYPTixD~cdt(eM}>1KEH3{f2j)L-q22Cixq*{TJ*u;Uz}Pgvz*|C(m9qcLT4
zcBlw_s+s8kVh+)V32m1YynAisF;?-G72+_Zy1wcrL|snU(Z3uOqfZuLH0OktEcY&J
zJ>za_Rw^U&-O73c>K?JQ(vD9?Fa5_8LzDvV7g0SP{>5_8z>1oyMN@9FA4oaH`4l^i
zNQkvjHsmDK-qZY(f3r(TMO{ld5h{n~RAX@FVJBN6W4`gGJFKCG^*!fV03qm#aM%F-
z)xfi=xe40uf}Wi`DU@XwU5#IbV|YmULYiDu?F<#c@GeO_OBxn;rMMR#Da0Q)sY;CF
zYx%f5c73a3X}WxVkuurcB+eCHQ~Im2bcZ^nMB=zMj7BV4ht9lYo!I~nZ>-K3|FD8*
zw$TRhXNFWKqGgt~ZMil4DaQ^a^Bp(VSPswaknc2!<{KguAdWY3gILYp3KI_HAN{)S8m&QLZQG_#`&rcd$=KsYAbvu0mLw7u}`rV%vnIZe!lx~3h&Q^#E1c^a?B
zj`^-EeC;U_@R2usF;YalRqYmYVWjWwM4i{kRq_0sI_qeZZ+f8jarO~=pba6YP7jX<
z%1c&l*Y}tWRtFUfqTJ*%eeFFkoa7n5`D=Kl-VsHYVZ}40`Pv|{T*p#>&2NW~-Xfc*
z)8gAZMsj7i)w_I?r!P@+YshG+0;ls6T!?X}w3`31a%S
ze((r>wv<5XJ3v^if#KvZ9)uqm2vPo>?FF}*U~sQp;h@Y_W-AXJGOV7(YS_=0W9tQ(
zUB&jK9Kh0JL3}A00#ruDaz+|MBIHG0k=-@1Pc#cVW)oVR%(-`*@7;fWMre|mPimVWcz0aWrMkM9@YFw4%Q!AtJN(GLEr#9cgOWjoQVDAx4AQ3--8JVJ$^q5vt_eGiFNL()`4V
zhjM?317FW`-zA}5sTA>FQl{*(V=jqAB9Yu~i?Q}RUu~;+{JQMDtpOhf8MgTG&+cgq
z7Vs3SnXRk(Et0#MEF!r-xuUZJm$K6KboEF*hYv{84K2sx6u7(FetuQhywa@+@GA2Kk<;AgVs(3tLwrST4Br&2
zf-mX}S9yp};jq*Bet)?Gz4_7KKbCfg-1E!;Sm<0{CVflNLwW$n_FXC@Qm1X&TiG~`
z9{&ymc$NEz_qReMBqXn(&!(2vF8ide@GgYXP>27*RK-$93Mq
zjLj^*-p3Y|Is2x2?}O)neq2C~A-R86stuu1!+^!|C4JpQ{^oP1`GOb|&)%#|MqMF7
zDQx25AB&L9Dot!m&xNh@GAqpNkLlgIc*L7+L7O-|W1pWav&(IcDMSpKU#KEigIK
zh~jLDSd{G-(5b8Kj;S}N1AMGIS97sliiX#q7QtO%bDzVNsr
zG2inQ*Oh0D`YF_kHJN$TCRWC(qlDW($qwZ30^F}Qy__!JekUTU`Qp`7>ZKF8x0=
zwI~}TI~h8xx|h;@J?@5~%U;S=oIc%9fnPQheN>Hi&5#)~w^l-<@wM|f$Z89I(7-ZP
zXeieCD)945aeP#rVD$-^$7zu*-3E_(L#qt1HA6;mTE*qzDi*!%q2DYW?qeDW>~K$g
z>y!kQy@+Z8qc+`h5OENo&g98}O)&DGZ?MxA7UB*MH;G*=Jsys+lZ_D`J}eCL*`8UL
zaQqJ4fHDd_NzbSyr%_S&5*^I7D_W)P>A70
zsQ6;n#)u0q?~{#^$UZds%VFYY6m4FDg*Tc<>tt^qL|6x`8v7i^_m%!N00Z|NabD?l
zUq)NaIDMxrl{n`lzrGHQzAoz?RwOzK^}#0M_0=+jhn;fzgqZI2E$(9^YvIuS*&|NV#<3mRcHd((_V2paklEVe^wJ
zO+FyOb2EDUZdX;8%_VA;^$B&KyUTc7Waeqn=K7$3SmpDg{mr&_Z%5llWao{EDy4>k
zAh>O`kg(^Jjt=R<{cQ@0%;YJ-`a+GpOO+EslF8Ic(@WOpkCL_Z;V{LxS!+h+7qeE>
zE+s~tk;%kG12~y{?=Ps$00`~QkOs%&F|imigHr>Dc3<|vu|k3@UOqcj4`fnYM4V`W
z?ziAEo)_6qGJ?Mt@t<7J#(17~e#hlwYdG4y&&_!_PZ?jF-SpQ1lJex~GuF54wTGejd=Ejhg9#{JhT{Qc#t?8col$-$l}
zJA?XZi;F~c^ys08U;`XF%w2DSSvA5}yQ*;P1SPSTRL64ntTT+HyUK@Tt&WQ`PFr7o
z82Ntv`)o_#N5agZJ}le399j|=oFnxcuf9R;#bRgo6yS>2%G*F1EXzw=WYFC)*%Lz0
z0WPT4VovOdsCT3VwgxeZzMA++)1`n2IEBQ!kZ_|5!c9PN%
zROtf21{>=d-XI;^pReji6Mv-8SZlY})<2~S@kQ13{IoZQ)d3T|>#y?$JD;jODYfEI
zVVOGVMPFXVmq*jik@vTNNm_l6&8Qb5SzRTpg+RFcUIDYM9$Ei;A)s|#M`3U}uwKJ_
zBUln{oj6pvC2mE#IOQ-UV?$?VX1mgNnPKXKe&`}I+mNK+(68=JVIKK%t66>^gsp@H
zYLdY)h}t+U9t*=8%%WR~=c0LGH?)D`D)H0Lp1vZ3US(ae8$+L41GUTLj{k7pK|bcQ
zev9D}f$i_BR8~*L1IH9!qYghkw?Z>ng~QlnVlW-d+Oc~h;XYqD4+(vozEGZn
zwH1zYz~_zf1av|)74ZqBNHTx*{m$Ro8LYh!PdC+?vq+-t3P_6M6=%+fQvBB74vsC}
zM|M3+kD*DT1h~oc(%nq(=Fw;)uW^Ll2fffbAfTkKBz^_pV8
zP#$pqAi8a`!{WY1?yK3)L`nuA9oyd6GYX)pTf=JKWL7ngg}eky*Xo)cpv7riA8foLAXRqQVdiNXPzcV6V~4^FEt-^Yr;
zV%2zxuA{IU&_HW5VpB!6q$}el7+Ga^|JAmv7c6lb4iy2lzidzmuo$
z!Bd|3!ItkeH&K+|Wy93S4C+0(H?A&eYl^bgvoHo63Va{d$ONyU=ZY~RzO_6dRZBtk
zhU*_wvjg%GtwYSm`6P)wv+{u#yz7Ddg?DII&s4V>i9Lz^E4_y&>!(;)h&M$AI&e+L
zel$uSSh0Jg&RB?uMUAMt{OFY&nxS!!o_KrxNQTI{aB6y%Qw8l2v~wsmc>RGGII5R<
zDj(MUOXBz)<`-4v`6qhHdf&&6*li7l@lh;;axwiOezJI2&e6PMwp{Ra^~)Ji?Rgsy
zn+&}%&ga?$B8wBjBWVSfI9;To`{2!y8kOL?K5H2{eHgYJ~#9gyJ0US}7iASJnGa
zB@$J3(34S{x))B>AXn}{-*9ie1iVgHxqdBdj)|gRtpLk84X_rAI_6bx(5vho%M2N5
zIVX7|p{5_^vT%KclHz`+Z~b%giIG#r53lyQ%ae@EGlO*6&xD;Q@o8sYqoLUG+{J`h
zD8b(iIBXcn&Z*#Vxhj#xwQ;sJNVLli9ZC?*9eIB2TUpuyJ;TSR3cFwI`dLH6`z}%V?q*MKL3VkAoe&17ye~ZQ!
z9EI60|AF8%;p1McvnzwO4rNhVq7Nl3q&)-+MU9|3X~BfTwXXg6)8k_!*4!`6lglzW
z3^iG5B9|n?D=2Q;@rS6?PaO=iLlgmD&HTdLr^N09U&2aj^+NZJ*gpliSVjHFJxPoW
z>@&5>{nnWYKOn?sq>4)84Adkj7+tv9y@P#Sw4q&pNnZG{!m%`!uP;h1PQ%2P=qQ&Z3|CKf${q`y7#~baoUOmRzVqJ}_7c??LSW-3NOe^q1g2I-D(X`qFu62RJwWsx#`@m0dS@Tqzl5NG
zKp#;-fHVRVw=91Y29qLt;#ssR7dpmgFwiI
zssCOVwlW5lp9Bm7Nh2ure*=K-1B-|QIgk->sSpvsfdB_$L^k*W>NkJ}a72QeObSHV
zD4PS(Kd|ft@wJt^}nwF^zz?w#RD?X
ze`d2m2q?G%2>Sy{Z$K>2`v>gYfFs}z%|D0mBLoy|38*2#O+G^mq1CVPAfR9dv|BUf
z1Bpo2O;xVVnutf8Q9-2ikXtT0XSvjPXE`!p8)3ew%Gu2vt^hghKa)xz1QhH782kZ&
zH((sdLV}wtlF`BsySy+#(&3o5;xhvaNY_mkcXl-GL-SEUoe_vk{`2{PK+t*pROxwr
zGC+*(pDdIR0ty}htPtbPXA^@2s8bQfsn-$4WO)C3l>y&x?1R8I(teW?dw6=rr7j+*
zJP!ZXWaa=b{U4V_3(1O?6a-YUdb=>M0XL)zd7Y#o1QaX*)cyg}H$V?B2tbT~Csgp{JK;-F2*`5k_EdI28`5=CBkh+8FJ|CqpaT%bt+c6V
zGgGB#Gsyrb<3BaxKnN%*`;XjIwI8`;fbk#hc*EcFSEM%cSNy+HRo(2huYso~)WAvq
z-|hNvNertp4+L_XMc%~!-R=PROo+3)sjguB6SB#MJD{rroLjDKK;vJRMN@O!4igwO
zs|~*8ItE@NUC2t+BLoyo4vhT)XEy)?AZPx^A&wAGa5td;2L#*zD3I|7wBCSVU=|5(
z68sd%XOp!C24QaBo;nhsWBKC(mk$cLLqMPk#3K6tdqqA4Oc5?-`u}Yp2j6mCB>@G<
zV94|Mf)G%Yi#cHZ55Z+ck{uR+6CrLq>PP~H0gj0A@2jHh