087 [src/validation.cpp] @ void CChainState::CheckBlockIndex()

[ihavenoface]

Context: https://github.com/peercoin/peercoin/blob/6839e7cc431fd284b80fdf6a2d338aa03ca3ab6a/src/validation.cpp#L4358-L4363
Origin: https://github.com/ihavenoface/diff-btc-ppc/blob/main/src/validation.cpp.diff

@@ -4404,23 +4358,6 @@ void CChainState::CheckBlockIndex()
         }
         if (!(pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_HAVE_DATA)) assert(!foundInUnlinked); // Can't be in m_blocks_unlinked if we don't HAVE_DATA
         if (pindexFirstMissing == nullptr) assert(!foundInUnlinked); // We aren't missing data for any parent -- cannot be in m_blocks_unlinked.
-        if (pindex->pprev && (pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_HAVE_DATA) && pindexFirstNeverProcessed == nullptr && pindexFirstMissing != nullptr) {
-            // We HAVE_DATA for this block, have received data for all parents at some point, but we're currently missing data for some parent.
-            assert(fHavePruned); // We must have pruned.
-            // This block may have entered m_blocks_unlinked if:
-            //  - it has a descendant that at some point had more work than the
-            //    tip, and
-            //  - we tried switching to that descendant but were missing
-            //    data for some intermediate block between m_chain and the
-            //    tip.
-            // So if this block is itself better than m_chain.Tip() and it wasn't in
-            // setBlockIndexCandidates, then it must be in m_blocks_unlinked.
-            if (!CBlockIndexWorkComparator()(pindex, m_chain.Tip()) && setBlockIndexCandidates.count(pindex) == 0) {
-                if (pindexFirstInvalid == nullptr) {
-                    assert(foundInUnlinked);
-                }
-            }
-        }
         // assert(pindex->GetBlockHash() == pindex->GetBlockHeader().GetHash()); // Perhaps too slow
         // End: actual consistency checks.