Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Maintenance form fields are not compliant with Public Code standard #354

Closed
valeriocomo opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@valeriocomo
Copy link
Collaborator

Subject of the issue

Form fields maintenance.contracts and maintenance.contractors don’t respect proper dependency from the maintenance.type property value, as reported in #349, issue 5.

Steps to reproduce

Select maintenance.type and you should see almost one between maintenance.contracts and maintenance.contractors form field.

Expected behaviour

Should be shown almost one between maintenance.contracts and maintenance.contractors form field according to the standard.

Actual behaviour

maintenance.contracts and maintenance.contractors are both shown regardless of the value of maintenance.type

@valeriocomo valeriocomo added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 6, 2024
@valeriocomo valeriocomo self-assigned this Dec 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant