You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We present new algorithm named DPM (Dynamic Pulling Methods). This idea is originated from PINNs(Raissi, Maziar, Paris Perdikaris, and George E. Karniadakis. "Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations." Journal of Computational Physics 378 (2019): 686-707.). While observing the capability of PINN as a tool for learning the dynamics of physical processes, we discovered that the accuracy of the approximate solution produced by PINN in an extrapolation setting is significantly reduced compared to that proceed in an extrapolation setting.
Motivated by this observation, we propose our method to improve the approximation accuracy in extrapolation and to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method with various benchmark problems.
This means that our models is well learned governing equation of Parital Differential Equations.
At each equation folder, there is 'equation_parameter_opt_Adam_weighted.py'(ex. Schrodinger_parameter_opt_Adam_weighted.py) file and it is a code for original PINN training in extrapolation. Also, 'equation_parameter_opt_Adam_weighted_ResNet.py'(ex. Schrodinger_parameter_opt_Adam_weighted_ResNet.py) file is for ResNet PINN.
Evaluation
Best hyperparameter is described in below.
Here are our best hyperparameters of DPM models:
Equation
num_layers
num_neurons
learning rate
epsilon
delta
w
Viscous Burgers
8
20
0.005
0.001
0.08
1.001
Inviscid Burgers
8
20
0.01
0.0123
1.00
1.0019
Schrodinger
3
50
0.001
0.003
0.05
1.029
Allen-Cahn
6
100
0.0005
0.001
0.01
1.022
For each equation folder, there exists tf_model directory which contains best hyperparameter checkpoints.
If you want to evaluate our model, then load checkpoints that I saved.
Also, I saved original-PINN and ResNet-PINN checkpoints in according directory. So it might be possible to compare performance between those two models and ours(DPM).
Comparison of performance in extrapolation between benchmark model and ours(DPM):
L2-norm error(lower is better):
Equation
Original PINN
ResNet PINN
DPM
Viscous Burgers
0.329
0.333
0.092
Inviscid Burgers
0.131
0.095
0.083
Schrodinger
0.350
0.286
0.182
Allen-Cahn
0.239
0.212
0.141
Explained Variance Score(higher is better):
Equation
Original PINN
ResNet PINN
DPM
Viscous Burgers
0.891
0.901
0.991
Inviscid Burgers
0.214
0.468
0.621
Schrodinger
0.090
0.919
0.967
Allen-Cahn
-4.364
-3.902
-3.257
Max Error(lower is better):
Equation
Original PINN
ResNet PINN
DPM
Viscous Burgers
0.657
1.081
0.333
Inviscid Burgers
3.088
2.589
1.534
Schrodinger
1.190
1.631
0.836
Allen-Cahn
4.656
4.222
3.829
Mean Absolute Error(lower is better):
Equation
Original PINN
ResNet PINN
DPM
Viscous Burgers
0.085
0.108
0.021
Inviscid Burgers
0.431
0.299
0.277
Schrodinger
0.212
0.142
0.094
Allen-Cahn
0.954
0.894
0.868
Citation
@misc{kim2020dpm,
title={DPM: A Novel Training Method for Physics-Informed Neural Networks in Extrapolation},
author={Jungeun Kim and Kookjin Lee and Dongeun Lee and Sheo Yon Jin and Noseong Park},
year={2020},
eprint={2012.02681},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.LG}
}