Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

community simulation media #125

Open
H1889 opened this issue Jun 27, 2022 · 7 comments
Open

community simulation media #125

H1889 opened this issue Jun 27, 2022 · 7 comments

Comments

@H1889
Copy link

H1889 commented Jun 27, 2022

Hello, I am going to simulate a community with 3 bacteria, A,B and C. B takes the products of A and C takes the products of B. When generating the models for gapfilling which medium do I use? Do I use the medium of A for all species or the recommended medium for each species?
Thanks

@Waschina
Copy link
Collaborator

There are different approached to this. However, the general goal is to have a gapfill-medium, that contains all essential nutrients to support the growth of the organism. The gapseq-predicted medium can be a good hint.

In your case, if C depends on nutrients provided by B, the gapfill medium of C should contain the metabolite(s) provided by B. Thus, I would recommend to use the gapfill medium that is predicted for each organism or, to merge the predicted media of all three organisms and use the same merged medium for gapfilling of all three organisms.

@H1889
Copy link
Author

H1889 commented Jun 28, 2022

I will do it. Thanks

@H1889
Copy link
Author

H1889 commented Jun 29, 2022

Sorry again, but I have another question, when running R with de gapfilled models with each predicted medium it is necesarry to supply a medium (arena_subs <- fread("medium.csv"), which medium is the best? I suppose the medium for A species, is it not?
Thanks

@jotech jotech reopened this Jun 30, 2022
@jotech
Copy link
Owner

jotech commented Jun 30, 2022

what about merging the media as proposed by Silvio?

@H1889
Copy link
Author

H1889 commented Jun 30, 2022

Yes that is an option (the merging media), but if I use the predicted media...in that case what would be the best medium?

@jotech
Copy link
Owner

jotech commented Jun 30, 2022

I'm not sure if I get what you want to do. But if you want to use the predicted media but do not want to merge the media for the community simulation, I would propose to use a standard medium defined by essential metabolites from all predicted media plus individual carbon/energy sources and minus the compounds that some members of the community can produce. Does it somehow answer your question?

@H1889
Copy link
Author

H1889 commented Jun 30, 2022

Yes you are right, but I wonder if we should not also simulate real life. In real life the input medium must contain the inorganic compunds, amino acids and vitamins requiered for all species plus the carbon source of species A and not the other carbon sources of the other species. Is that right?
Thanks for the help.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants