You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be more efficient to have biased emission in the case of a source external to the dust grid. This is clear in the case for the Slab benchmark where many of the photons emitted isotropically from the star do not intersect with the slab. It would be better to be able to specify a emission direction and solid angle (via circular spot with angular radius). We may still have some photons that do not intersect the dust grid, but it would be many fewer.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be more efficient to have biased emission in the case of a source external to the dust grid. This is clear in the case for the Slab benchmark where many of the photons emitted isotropically from the star do not intersect with the slab. It would be better to be able to specify a emission direction and solid angle (via circular spot with angular radius). We may still have some photons that do not intersect the dust grid, but it would be many fewer.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: