Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[feature] Cache Key Customization #11328

Open
zzmao opened this issue Oct 23, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

[feature] Cache Key Customization #11328

zzmao opened this issue Oct 23, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@zzmao
Copy link
Collaborator

zzmao commented Oct 23, 2024

Feature Area

/area backend
/area sdk

What feature would you like to see?

Setting custom cache key at the task level

What is the use case or pain point?

Currently, the cache key in KFP is generated internally, and users are unable to customize or set it.
However, some users have expressed the need for more granular control over caching behavior by setting custom cache keys at the task level.

Is there a workaround currently?

N/A

KFP community meeting discussion for this feature

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5iynMg_DNk

Proposal:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oNgYyFYondaVSFf9Pd3Q9uVzaqBr5wrOMHKgX9MMa78/edit?tab=t.0


Love this idea? Give it a 👍.

@TheSwarnim
Copy link

TheSwarnim commented Dec 7, 2024

Hi @HumairAK @zzmao, I would like to work on this issue as my first contribution in the community.

@HumairAK
Copy link
Collaborator

HumairAK commented Dec 8, 2024

That would be great! /assign @TheSwarnim

@TheSwarnim
Copy link

Hey @HumairAK, thanks for assigning it to me. I usually work on weekend for the opensource project due to a full time job which I'm also pursuing. I'll raise the PR with all the changes by this coming weekend.

@Garvit-77
Copy link

Hey as it's more than 4 weeks and no PR was raised
@TheSwarnim are you still working on this issue ?

@TheSwarnim
Copy link

Hi @Garvit-77 a PR was raised for this change some time ago. So was not checking out this
#11466
Please let me know if pick this PR and update with the relevant changes raised by the reviewer

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants