☂️ Release v0.10.0 requirements

[mimowo]

We are targeting the release for the first week of Dev 2024. Since the date is close and 0.9 was not so long ago we may skip release candidate.

Must Haves

Preview Give feedback

1. Allow StatefulSet scaling down to zero and scale up from zero. #3487
   approved cncf-cla: yes kind/feature lgtm release-note size/XL +6
   
2. TAS: support rank-ordering for Pods for built-in integrations #3533
   kind/feature +1
   

   
3. TAS: respect node taints when the lowest hierarchy level is node #3658
   kind/feature +1
   

Nice To Haves

Preview Give feedback

1. MVP support for serving workloads running as LeaderWorkerSet #3232
   kind/feature +1
   
2. Promote ConfigurableResourceTransformations and WorkloadResourceRequestsSummary to Beta #3616
   approved cncf-cla: yes kind/feature lgtm release-note size/L +6
   
3. Filter manageJobsWithoutQueueNames using a namespaceSelector for all integrations #3589
   kind/feature +1
   
4. Local queues prometheus metrics #1833
   kind/feature +1
   
5. Default LocalQueue #2936
   kind/feature +1
   
6. TAS: Optimize Workload object size by listing only hostname values in .status.TopologyAssignment field #3671
   kind/feature +1
7. TAS: API to support rank-based ordering for custom CRDs #3663
   kind/feature +1
   
8. TAS: CQ is not deactivated when there is no Topology #3645
   kind/bug +1
   
9. Graduate MultiplePreemptions to Stable #3602
   approved cncf-cla: yes kind/cleanup kind/feature lgtm release-note size/XL +7
   

[mimowo]

It is going to be a smaller release than before, but we make it to release the TAS rank-based ordering which is awaited by users. Let me know if we you know about some other candidate features that could make it

cc @tenzen-y @mwielgus @mwysokin @dgrove-oss @kannon92

[mimowo]

@dgrove-oss @tenzen-y Maybe we could consider graduating ConfigurableResourceTransformations to Beta?

[dgrove-oss]

Maybe we could consider graduating ConfigurableResourceTransformations to Beta?

It's relatively low risk (changing the feature gate to enable by default) and doesn't add/change any API. There hasn't been much time to get user feedback, but that's probably ok.

[tenzen-y]

@dgrove-oss @tenzen-y Maybe we could consider graduating ConfigurableResourceTransformations to Beta?

Does this indicate that we will graduate both ConfigurableResourceTransformations and WorkloadResourceRequestsSummary to beta?

[mimowo]

Yes, I see no blockers for that

[tenzen-y]

Yes, I see no blockers for that

SGTM, let us collect feedbacks by graduating those to beta

[mimowo]

@dgrove-oss feel free to submit a PR for that

[mimowo]

I have updated the nice-to-haves with 3 related KEPs:

• Filter manageJobsWithoutQueueNames using a namespaceSelector for all integrations #3589
• Local queues prometheus metrics #1833
• Default LocalQueue #2936

[mimowo]

Also, updated the list with TAS-related pending issues.

[mimowo]

I'm ok to slightly postpone the original release target date to try to include the PRs which look almost ready:

• Local queues prometheus metrics #1833
• Default LocalQueue #2936

cc @yaroslava-serdiuk @KPostOffice

[mimowo]

/close
We are in progress of preparing 0.10 already.

[k8s-ci-robot]

@mimowo: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

/close
We are in progress of preparing 0.10 already.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.