We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Double at 3c should have positive ev
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
[Event ""] [Site ""] [Date ""] [Board "122"] [Dealer "E"] [Vulnerable "All"] [Deal "E:98.Q43.62.AJT985 A73.AK2.AKJ.K763 KJT2.T65.9853.42 Q654.J987.QT74.Q"] [Scoring ""] [BCFlags "1f"] [Generator "BridgeComposer Version 5.104.1"] [South "WBridge5"] [West "ben0308p5dd"] [North "WBridge5"] [East "ben0308p5dd"] [Declarer "S"] [Contract "3NT"] [Result "9"] {PAR of the deal: 4NT = played by North: 630 points} {PAR computation time: 00'02"} {Feasability: 7 10 10 10 10 6 3 3 3 3 7 10 10 10 10 6 3 3 3 3 } [Auction "E"] Pass 2C Pass 2D Pass 2NT Pass 3C Pass 3D Pass 3NT Pass Pass Pass [Play "W"] D3 d4 D2 da H6 h7 H4 ha D5 d7 D6 dk H5 hj HQ h2 C2 cq CA c3 C4 s4 CJ c7 HT h8 H3 hk D9 dq C5 dj S2 h9 S9 s3 D8 dt S8 c6 ST s5 C8 s7 SK s6 CT sa SJ sq C9 ck
Sorry, something went wrong.
BBA suggests X
BEN also consider it
So here the simulation kicks in and BEN Pass.
Perhaps it is bad samples, but here are the samples
One problem here is that double dummy partner will lead a club, so why double, and risk they find a 4-3 major fit
EdwardPiwowar/BBA#367
No branches or pull requests
Double at 3c should have positive ev
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: