KQJxx in trumps not enough to double?

[ThePokerDude]

I think Ben has enough for a double to 4h.

[Event ""]
[Site ""]
[Date ""]
[Board "196"]
[Dealer "W"]
[Vulnerable "All"]
[Deal "W:T.9.K98753.T9432 KQ985.AT8763.2.8 76432.KQJ54..AKJ AJ.2.AQJT64.Q765"]
[Scoring ""]
[BCFlags "1f"]
[Generator "BridgeComposer Version 5.104.1"]
[South "WBridge5"]
[West "ben0308p5dd"]
[North "WBridge5"]
[East "ben0308p5dd"]
[Declarer "N"]
[Contract "4H"]
[Result "8"]
{PAR of the deal: 3H = played by North: 140 points}
{PAR computation time: 00'03"}
{Feasability: 6 7 9 8 8 7 5 4 4 4 5 7 9 8 8 7 5 4 4 4 }
[Auction "W"]
Pass 1H 1S 2D
Pass 2H Pass 3NT
Pass 4H Pass Pass
Pass
[Play "E"]
CK c5 C4 c8
S4 sj ST s5
HQ h2 H9 ht
S7 sa D3 sq
H5 da D5 d2
S6 d4 C3 s9
H4 c6 D7 ha
HJ d6 D8 h3
S3 dt D9 sk
S2 dj CT s8
HK c7 C9 h6
CA cq C2 h8
CJ dq DK h7

[ThorvaldAagaard]

It is an interesting board, and 1H is not everyones choice - 1S overcall is perhaps not best, but look what can happen

After a weak 2H I totally disagree with 2S

But I asked BEN, what to do with 4H, and got this response

So BEN will not consider a double, probably due to missing training.
In passout-sitatuations BEN might consider double, like West last pass

but with less than 1%.