Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some thoughts on estimator explainers (WIP) #169

Open
robertness opened this issue May 3, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Some thoughts on estimator explainers (WIP) #169

robertness opened this issue May 3, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@robertness
Copy link

robertness commented May 3, 2022

Don't mind me. Just scribbling down some suggestions as I familiarize myself with the package.

On the "exposure-based models"
image

One way to explain: Models that adjust for many confounders at once using propensity scores. Propensity scores are estimates being assigned to the exposed group. These models calculate propensity scores for each individual, even when they weren't in the exposed group.

On the "outcome-based models"
image
Perhaps linear regression should be presented as the default choice so as not to encourage people to use the more heavy duty models when a simpler model will work fine and is more defensible?

Relatedly, in the text below...
image
it says it uses bootstrap CI for "Linear Regression models". Perhaps it should be "Outcome-based models", since that would allow for nonlinear double ML models in the future?

Also the linear regression estimator in DoWhy does not use bootstrap. It uses the statsmodels library, which uses t-distribution-based CI.

@GeorgeS2019
Copy link

@robertness

ShowWhy enables emulation of randomized controlled trials that produce a high standard of real-world evidence.

I could not find any references.

An animated screenshot in a gif showing how the package works would be great!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants