You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Yesterday when I was doing pockets with krabzCam.
I was thinking it would make it a lot more attractive to have finishing passes if it were easier to create one.
As I understand it, it's possible to to do a pocket with: "Roughing clearance (mm)" set, and after that do a "Profile inside" operation. To clean the whole cut at once.
Wouldn't it be easier to have something like two extra inputs:
check box "Enable finishing pass"
when the "Enable finishing pass" checkbox is enabled an extra text-input-box appears: "Finishing pass width (mm): "
So when you enable [1] and enter 0.2mm into [2] you'll first do a pocket with a clearance of 0.2mm from the sides. Next you'll do a profile inside for this last 0.2mm from [2] and cut these at full-depth. To get rid of all the Z lines.
Do you think this could be useful?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thanks for the input!
I think I will leave this as is for now. It's a good idea, but I'm a little bit concerned about the added complexity, both in the user interface and in the code.
I would like to keep the issue open and think a little bit more about it.
-M
Yesterday when I was doing pockets with krabzCam.
I was thinking it would make it a lot more attractive to have finishing passes if it were easier to create one.
As I understand it, it's possible to to do a pocket with: "Roughing clearance (mm)" set, and after that do a "Profile inside" operation. To clean the whole cut at once.
Wouldn't it be easier to have something like two extra inputs:
So when you enable [1] and enter 0.2mm into [2] you'll first do a pocket with a clearance of 0.2mm from the sides. Next you'll do a profile inside for this last 0.2mm from [2] and cut these at full-depth. To get rid of all the Z lines.
Do you think this could be useful?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: