-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 85
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rpart fails to predict on titanic task #97
Comments
Titanic needs preprocessing, better don't use it for automatic tests. |
You could create a preprocessed version and add it to the package, though. |
rpart breaks, there is nothing I can do about it. You need to merge levels or use stratification. |
bah, i hate this issue. does anyone know what they are doing in other toolboxes? is it possible to have a "fallback"? that would only work if the fallback is only on the observations where we break, which would imply testing them all one-by-one. which is totally infeasible as too expensive? |
well. we DO know which levels a learner has seen during training? so we DO know on which observations it WILL break? even without calling it? |
in any case, this does not seem like an mlr3 issue, and if somebody does not post otherwise, i dont see a simple solution here. i will try to think about this further in pipelines |
i tried to outline a solution in the issue here: |
throws:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: