You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We've intentionally avoided trying to have a shared vocabulary across different formats, so everyone using the tool has to specify feature mappings in order to get any output. Nonetheless, for specific pairs of formats, it should be possible to create a mapping that will work for most people most of the time, allowing them to write, for example:
[export]
mode = 'conllu'
[[export.mappings]]
in_feature = 'FlexText:en:segnum'out_feature = 'conllu:sent_id'
[[export.mappings]]
# many more lines
Any explicit mappings should override corresponding lines in the standard mapping, which should work fine if we just load the standard one first and concatenate the lists before calling parse_mappings.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We've intentionally avoided trying to have a shared vocabulary across different formats, so everyone using the tool has to specify feature mappings in order to get any output. Nonetheless, for specific pairs of formats, it should be possible to create a mapping that will work for most people most of the time, allowing them to write, for example:
rather than
Any explicit mappings should override corresponding lines in the standard mapping, which should work fine if we just load the standard one first and concatenate the lists before calling
parse_mappings
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: