Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Create a new, more flexible representation for the generator's return type #22

Open
darcey opened this issue Jan 24, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Create a new, more flexible representation for the generator's return type #22

darcey opened this issue Jan 24, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@darcey
Copy link
Collaborator

darcey commented Jan 24, 2023

The current return type is a dictionary which is well-suited to beam search but less well-suited to some of the other methods. Probably want to create a class to represent the generator's return type.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@darcey