Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Look at human and model accuracy within each arg class for each scenario #69

Open
danielbear opened this issue Apr 21, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@danielbear
Copy link

For example, compare humans to DPI to FitVid

We know they have similar overall accuracy on some of the scenarios.

What is the "per-arg class" accuracy for each? For instance, there are different classes/batches of Dominoes trials -- some with 2 dominoes, some with 4, some with occluders, some with missing dominoes, etc. Are there particular arg classes where people/models are doing especially well, or differently from each other?

This analysis is critical for improving the benchmark: we want to make sure that models are not doing well by essentially classifying which arg set was used to generate a trial, and then guessing the average outcome for that class (which may not be 50% since we didn't "microbalance" the scenarios.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants