Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kubeflow 1.7 #113

Open
yannick-roeder opened this issue Jun 26, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Kubeflow 1.7 #113

yannick-roeder opened this issue Jun 26, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@yannick-roeder
Copy link

We would love to run Kubeflow 1.7 on Openshift. Are there any plans to update this repository for Kubeflow 1.7 in the near future?

This would also resolve compatibility issues with Openshift 4.10+ (#112).

@utsumi-fj
Copy link

I want to know the same thing. I would also like to know the release cycle.
The plan was changed from kubeflow#2312 (comment) ?

@utsumi-fj
Copy link

@VaishnaviHire @LaVLaS
Do you know the release schedule for 1.7 ?

@LaVLaS
Copy link

LaVLaS commented Oct 5, 2023

We put our support for Kubeflow releases, specifically KF 1.7, on hold due to internal resourcing issues and focusing of support for specific KF components used in ODH. While we skipped the KF 1.7 release, we do plan to provide manifests for the KF 1.8 release (kubeflow#2449 (comment)).

At this time, we have not discussed adding manifests for KF 1.7 on OpenShift but I will leave this issue open as we are having internal discussions on the possibility of extending our existing KF support to the entire KF stack running on OpenShift

CC @jeremyeder

@utsumi-fj
Copy link

@LaVLaS Thanks so much for your reply. I got it.

but I will leave this issue open as we are having internal discussions on the possibility of extending our existing KF support to the entire KF stack running on OpenShift

Does extending KF support to the entire KF stack running on OpenShift mentioned above mean extending current limited functionality such as #114 ?

@LaVLaS
Copy link

LaVLaS commented Oct 9, 2023

For the previous KF releases where we did provide manifests for deploying on OCP, there were two types levels of effort

  1. Ensure that there were no major blockers in the KF release that would prevent it from deploying on OpenShift
  2. Provide proof of concept work for integration downstream projects (UBI base images, Red Hat Service Mesh, ODH Jupyter notebooks, ...)

Does extending KF support to the entire KF stack running on OpenShift mentioned above mean extending current limited functionality such as #114 ?

I can't provide a answer to #114 without setting aside time to debug the differences. The KF 1.6 on OpenShift release was extremely limited in the amount of time we could devote to testing the release. While we don't have an increase in the resources providing KF 1.7 release testing on OCP our focus is solely on ensuring the vanilla KF releasesworks on OpenShift so any difference in functionality is a bug that should be filed here to see if it is a fix on OpenShift or upstream KF

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants